Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:10:24.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of Triazine-Resistant Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William K. Vencill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

The distribution pattern of s-triazine-resistant biotypes of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL) and smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH) in Virginia was determined. Seeds were collected from suspected triazine-resistant biotypes of both species. Triazine resistance was confirmed by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence in the presence of atrazine [6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine]. Greenhouse bioassay with whole-plant material and a sinking leaf disc assay were also performed as further confirmation of triazine resistance. Triazine-resistant smooth pigweed was confirmed in 19 counties and common lambsquarters in eight counties in Virginia. Triazine-resistant smooth pigweed and common lambsquarters were located mostly in the northern and southwestern highlands of the state where there has been a long history of triazine use in no-till corn (Zea mays L.) production. S-triazine-resistant biotypes were also cross-resistant to other representative s-triazine and as-triazine herbicides but susceptible to the substituted urea herbicide diuron [N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea].

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H., Arntzen, C. J., and Stoller, E. W. 1981. Chlorophyll fluorescence for determination of triazine resistance. Weed Sci. 29:316322.Google Scholar
2. Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide resistant weeds in North America. Pages 930 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
3. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evaluation of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 3:179.Google Scholar
4. Hensley, J. R. 1981. A method for identification of triazine resistant and susceptible biotypes of several weeds. Weed Sci. 29:7073.Google Scholar
5. Oettmeir, W., Masson, K., Fedke, C., Konze, J., and Schmidt, R. R. 1982. Effect of different photosystem II inhibitors on chloroplasts isolated from species either susceptible or resistant toward s-triazine herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 18:357367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614615.Google Scholar
7. Steucek, G. L. and Hill, R. J. 1985. Photosynthesis II. An assay for herbicide resistance in weeds. Am. Biol. Teach. 47:96102.Google Scholar
8. Truelove, B., Davis, D. E., and James, L. R. 1974. A new method for detecting photosynthesis inhibitors. Weed Sci. 22:1517.Google Scholar
9. Truelove, B. and Hensley, J. R. 1982. Methods of testing for herbicide resistance. Pages 177–132 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar