Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:55:23.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Fomesafen, Saflufenacil, Sulfentrazone, and Flumioxazin from a Tennessee Soil under Field Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas C. Mueller ,
Bill W. Boswell ,
Sara S. Mueller  and
Lawrence E. Steckel
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Bill W. Boswell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
Sara S. Mueller
Affiliation:
Bearden High School, Knoxville, TN 37909
Lawrence E. Steckel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fomesafen, saflufenacil, and sulfentrazone had similar parameters for their mass spectrometry analysis, all being analyzed in negative mode with similar ionization energies. Flumioxazin was analyzed in positive mode using different ionization temperatures and voltage energies, and a larger injection volume (10 µl compared with 2–5 µl) due to lower liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) detector response. Quantitative limits of detection in soil were < 5 parts per billion by weight for all herbicides. The field study was conducted three times (2010, 2011, 2012) with four blocks of each treatment each year. Herbicide concentrations over time were based on field samples that were later extracted and quantified using the described LC-MS procedures. Data were examined using a simple first-order (SFO) equation with each year-by-herbicide treatment combination regressed using SigmaPlot version 12.5 to determine regression parameters. The SFO rate constant was used to determine a half life, or DT50 (in days) for each curve. All data were analyzed using a GLMMix ANOVA procedure using SAS version 9.3 and contrast statements were used to directly compare each herbicide comparison. Slopes for each herbicide use the SFO curve and were estimated using SAS. The order from shortest to longest DT50 was flumioxazin (21.1 d) = saflufenacil (21.4 d) < fomesafen (45.6 d) < sulfentrazone (70.8 d). These results concur with the labeled recrop recommendations after application for flumioxazin and saflufenacil, which have shorter cotton plant-back restrictions compared with sulfentrazone and fomesafen. In these studies, none of the herbicides was highly persistent (all half-lives < 100 d), so none would be expected to be persistent pollutants in the environment, although further research is needed in this area.

Keywords

Soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrDegradationherbicideLC-MSpersistencesoils
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 664 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alister, C, Rojas, S, Gomez, P, Kogan, M (2008) Dissipation and movement of flumioxazin in soil at four field sites in Chile. Pest Manag Sci. 64:579–583 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013a) Fomesafen label. p 28. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld6BJ003.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2013Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013b) Flumioxazin label. p 9. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld3LL041.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2013Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013c) Sulfentrazone label. p 5. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ldB2H002.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2013Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013d) Saflufenacil label. p 4. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld99E024.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2013Google Scholar
Blumhorst, MR, Mueller, TC (1997) Quality control procedures in herbicide field dissipation studies. Weed Technol. 11:832–837 Google Scholar
Cobucci, T, Prates, HT, Falcao, CLM, Rezende, MMV (1998) Effect of imazamox, fomesafen, and acifluorfen soil residues on rotational crops. Weed Sci. 46:258–263 Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Lydon, J, Becerril, JM, Sherman, TD, Lehnen, LP, Matsumoto, H (1991) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 39:465–473 Google Scholar
Feng, ZZ, Li, QF, Zhang, J, Zhang, J, Huang, X, Lu, P, Li, SP (2012) Microbial degradation of fomesafen by newly isolated strain Pseudomonas zeshuii BY-1 and the biochemical degradation pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 60:7104–7110 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Vencill, WK (2003) Flumioxazin soil persistence and mineralization in laboratory experiments. J Agric Food Chem. 51:4719–4721 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Vencill, WK, Xia, K, Grey, TL (2005) Sorption and desorption of flumioxazin to soil, clay minerals and ion-exchange resin. Pest Manag Sci. 61:40–46 Google Scholar
Gallaher, K, Mueller, TC (1996) Effect of crop presence on persistence of atrazine, metribuzin, and clomazone in surface soil. Weed Sci. 44:698–703 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Mantripagada, N, Culpepper, AS (2007) Residual herbicide dissipation from soil with low density polyethylene mulch or left bare. Weed Sci. 55:638–643 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Walker, RH, Wehtje, GR, Hancock, HG (1997) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45:733–738 Google Scholar
Grossman, K, Hutzler, J, Caspar, G, Kwiatkowski, J, Brommer, CL (2011) Saflufenacil (Kixor) biokinetic properties and mechanism of selectivity of a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase inhibiting herbicide. Weed Sci. 59:290–298 Google Scholar
Grossman, K, Niggeweg, R, Christiansen, N, Looser, R, Ehrhardt, T (2010) The herbicide saflufenacil (Kixor) is a new inhibitor of protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase activity. Weed Sci. 58:1–9 Google Scholar
Guo, JF, Zhu, GN, Shi, JJ, Sun, JH (2003) Adsorption, desorption and mobility of fomesafen in Chinese soils. Water Air Poll. 148:77–85 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Darta, A, Scott, J, Klein, RN, Golus, J (2009) Problem weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybean with glyphosate tank mixes and soil applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 23:507–512 Google Scholar
Kwon, JW, Armbrust, KL, Grey, TL (2004) Hydrolysis and photolysis of flumioxazin in aqueous buffer solutions. Pest Manag Sci. 60:939–943 Google Scholar
Main, CL, Mueller, TC, Hayes, RM, Wilcut, JW, Peeper, TF, Talbert, RE, Witt, WW (2004) Sulfentrazone persistence in southern soils: bioavailable concentration and effect on a rotational cotton crop. Weed Technol. 18:346–352 Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE (2011) Efficacy and dissipation of pyroxasulfone and three chloroacetamides in a Tennessee field soil. Weed Sci. 59:574–579 Google Scholar
Ohmes, GA, Hayes, RM, Mueller, TC (2000) Sulfentrazone dissipation in a Tennessee soil. Weed Technol. 14:100–105 Google Scholar
Ohmes, GA, Mueller, TC (2007) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility in surface soil of the southern United States. Weed Technol. 21:796–800 Google Scholar
Papiernik, SK, Koskinen, WC, Barber, BL (2012) Low sorption and fast dissipation of the herbicide saflufenacil and surface soils and subsoils of an eroded Prairie landscape. J Agric Food Chem. 10941–10946 Google Scholar
Pekarek, RA, Garvey, PV, Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, MacRae, AW (2010) Sulfentrazone carryover to vegetables and cotton. Weed Technol. 24:20–24 Google Scholar
Potter, TL, Truman, CC, Webster, TM, Bosch, DD, Strickland, TC (2011) Tillage, cover crop residue management, and irrigation incorporation impact on fomesafen runoff. J Agric Food Chem. 59:7910–7915 Google Scholar
Rauch, BJ, Bellinder, RR, Brainard, DC, Lane, M, Thies, JE (2007) Dissipation of fomesafen in New York state soils and potential to cause carryover injury to sweet corn. Weed Technol. 21:206–212 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Locke, MA (1998) Sulfentrazone sorption, desorption, and mineralization in soils from two tillage systems. Weed Sci. 46:494–500 Google Scholar
Robinson, DE, McNaughton, KE (2012) Saflufenacil carryover injury varies among rotational crops. Weed Technol. 26:177–182 Google Scholar
Senseman, SA (2007a) Flumioxazin. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, Kansas Weed Science Society of America. Pp 202–203 Google Scholar
Senseman, SA (2007b) Fomesafen. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, Kansas Weed Science Society of America. Pp 207–208 Google Scholar
Senseman, SA (2007c) Sulfentrazone. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, Kansas Weed Science Society of America. Pp 217–218 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2012) Field dissipation of sulfentrazone and pendimethalin in Colorado. Weed Technol. 26:633–637 Google Scholar
Shibata, A, Kodaka, R, Fujisawa, T, Katagi, T (2011) Dissipation of flumioxazin in illuminated water–sediment systems. J Agric Food Chem. 59:11186–11195 Google Scholar
Szmigielski, AM, Schoenau, JJ, Johnson, EN, Holm, FA, Sapsford, KL, Kiu, JX (2012) Effects of soil factors on phytotoxicity and dissipation of sulfentrazone in Canadian prairies soils. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal. 43:896–904 Google Scholar
Waggoner, BS, Mueller, TC, Bond, JA, Steckel, LE (2011) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with saflufenacil tank mixtures in no-till cotton. Weed Technol. 25:310–315 Google Scholar
Weber, JB (1993) Ionization and sorption of fomesafen and atrazine by soils and soil constituents. Pestic Sci. 39:31–38 Google Scholar
Weber, JB, Strek, HJ, Sartori, JL (1993) Mobility of fomesafen and atrazine in soil columns under saturated flow and unsaturated flow conditions. Pestic Sci. 39:39–46 Google Scholar