Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:30:38.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Tolerance of Hawaiian Sugarcane Cultivars to Diuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. V. Osgood ,
R. R. Romanowski  and
H. W. Hilton
R. V. Osgood
Affiliation:
Dep. of Chem. and Weed Control, Exp. Sta., Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Assoc, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
R. R. Romanowski
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Indiana 47907
H. W. Hilton
Affiliation:
Dep. of Chem. and Weed Control, Exp. Sta., Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Assoc, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hawaiian sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum L. hybrids) differed considerably in their tolerance to 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron). There was a greater concentration of diuron in the younger leaves of a sensitive cultivar, ‘H 53–263,’ compared with a tolerant cultivar, ‘H 50–7209′; degradation of diuron was more extensive in ‘H 50–7209′. The metabolites identified after applications of carbonyl-labeled diuron to the root system were 1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-methylurea (monomethyl-diuron) and 1-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)urea (demethylated diuron). Differences in diuron phytotoxicity to cultivars ‘H 53–263’ and ‘H 50–7209’ are at least partially explained by differences in the distribution and degradation of diuron.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , November 1972 , pp. 537 - 539
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bayer, D. E. and Yamaguchi, S. 1965. Absorption and distribution of diuron-C14 . Weeds 13:232–235.Google Scholar
2. Fang, S. C., Freed, V. H., Johnson, R. H., and Coffee, D. R., 1955. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of radioactive 3-(p chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (CMU) by bean plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 3:400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Haun, J. R. and Peterson, J. H. 1955. Translocation of 3-(p chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in plants. Weeds 3: 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Millhollon, R. W. and Matherne, R. S. 1968. Tolerance of sugarcane varieties to herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:300–303.Google Scholar
5. Minshall, W. H. 1954. Translocation path and place of action of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in bean and tomato. Can. J. Bot. 32:795–798.Google Scholar
6. Muzik, T. J., Cruzado, H. J., and Loustalot, A. J. 1954. Studies on the absorption, translocation, and action of CMU. Bot. Gaz. 116:65–73.Google Scholar
7. Nolla, J. A. B. 1950. Injury to sugarcane from 2,4-D. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 7:178–189.Google Scholar
8. Olney, J. H., Yip, G., and Aldridge, M. H. 1968. A metabolic study of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron) applied to corn seedlings. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16: 426–433.Google Scholar
9. Peng, Y. S. and Yeh, H. J. 1970. Determination of varietal tolerance of sugarcane to pre-emergence diuron and atrazine. Weed Res. 10:218–229.Google Scholar
10. Rogers, R. L. and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1968. Physiological aspects of fluometuron in cotton and cucumber. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:434–440.Google Scholar
11. Smith, J. W. and Sheets, T. J. 1967. Uptake, distribution and metabolism of monuron and diuron by several plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:577–581.Google Scholar
12. Swanson, C. R. and Swanson, H. R. 1968. Metabolic fate of monuron and diuron in isolated leaf discs. Weed Sci. 16:137–143.Google Scholar