Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:55:06.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diclofop Resistance in Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Olufunmilayo O. Joseph ,
Shaun L.A. Hobbs  and
Sakti Jana
Olufunmilayo O. Joseph
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci. and Plant Ecol., Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W0
Shaun L.A. Hobbs
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci. and Plant Ecol., Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W0
Sakti Jana
Affiliation:
Plant Biotechnol. Inst., Nat. Res. Counc., Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The differences in tolerance, morphology, and physiological response of diclofop-resistant and -susceptible wild oat biotypes collected from fields in Saskatchewan, Canada, were investigated under growth room and field conditions. Under herbicide-free conditions the resistant biotype had more upright leaves with about 12% less leaf area and 50% less leaf width than the susceptible biotype. A marked difference in the level of tolerance to diclofop was observed. Photosynthesis was initially significantly reduced in both biotypes after treatment with diclofop at the rate of 0.70 kg ai ha−1, but the resistant biotype was able to recover. Injury to the susceptible biotype was reduced by coating the seeds with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride. Differential foliar retention was not an important factor in selectivity of diclofop among the two biotypes.

Keywords

Diclofop (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic acidwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAPhysiological responseretentionselectivitynaphthalic anhydrideAvena fatuaAVEFA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 1990 , pp. 475 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akey, W. C. and Morrison, I. N. 1983. Effect of moisture stress on wild oat (Avena fatua) response to diclofop. Weed Sci. 31:247–253.Google Scholar
2. Banting, J. D. 1977. Growth habit and control of wild oat. Agric. Can. Publ. #1531.Google Scholar
3. Boldt, P. F. and Putnam, A. A. 1980. Selectivity mechanism for foliar applications of diclofop-methyl. I. Retention, absorption, translocation and volatility. Weed Sci. 28:474–477.Google Scholar
4. Brezeanu, A. G., Davis, D. G., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1976. Ultrastructural effects and translocation of methyl-2-(4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-phenoxy)propanoate in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oat (Avena fatua). Can. J. Bot. 54:2038–2048.Google Scholar
5. Codd, T. M. 1986. 1,8-naphthalic anhydride as a herbicide safener for cultivated oats. Pestic. Sci. 17:60.Google Scholar
6. Donald, W. W. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1980. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl between wheat and wild oat: growth and herbicide metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 49:459–464.Google Scholar
7. Hall, C., Edgington, L. V., and Switzer, C. M. 1982. Translocation of different 2,4-D, bentazon, diclofop, or diclofop-methyl combinations in oat (Avena sativa) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:676–682.Google Scholar
8. Hobbs, S.L.A. and Mahon, J. D. 1985. Inheritance of chlorophyll content, ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase activity, and stomatal resistance in peas. Crop Sci. 25:1031–1034.Google Scholar
9. Holly, K. 1976. Selectivity in relation to formulation and application methods. Pages 423–464 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicide: Physiology, Biochemistry and Ecology. Vol. II. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
10. Hoppe, H. H. and Zacher, H. 1981. Untersuchergen zur selektivitat von diclofop-methyl an Zea mays, Triticum aestivum und Phaseolus vulgaris . Z. Pflenzenkr. Pflanzenschutz. Sonderheft 9:179.Google Scholar
11. Hull, H. 1983. Leaf structure and absorption. Residue Rev. 17:82–122.Google Scholar
12. Jacobson, A. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1982. The absorption and translocation of diclofop-methyl and amitrole in wheat and oat roots. Physiol. Plant 54:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Jacobson, A., Shimabukuro, R. H., and McMichael, C. 1985. Response of wheat and oat seedlings to root applied diclofop-methyl and 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 24:61–67.Google Scholar
14. Jana, S. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Adaptation for herbicide tolerance in populations of Avena fatua L. Can. J. Bot. 60:1611–1617.Google Scholar
15. Kocher, H. and Lotzch, K. 1981. Aufnahme und verteilung des herbizids diclotop-methyl bei ein und zweikeimblattrigen Pflazenarten. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz. Sonderheft 9:171–177.Google Scholar
16. LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. 1982. Herbicide resistance in plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 401 pp.Google Scholar
17. Mapplebeck, L. R., Souza-Machado, V., and Grodzinski, B. 1982. Seed germination and seedling growth characteristics of atrazine-susceptible and resistant biotypes of Brassica campestris . Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:733–739.Google Scholar
18. Marriage, P. B. and Warwick, S. I. 1980. Differential growth and response to atrazine between and within susceptible and resistant biotypes of Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 20:9–15.Google Scholar
19. Marx, J. L. 1983. Plant's resistance to herbicide pinpointed. Science 200:41–42.Google Scholar
20. Pfister, K., Radosevich, S. R., and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. Modification of herbicide binding to photosystem II in two biotypes of Senecio vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 64:995–999.Google Scholar
21. Radosevich, S. R., Steinbeck, K. E., and Arntzen, C. J. 1979. Effect of PS II inhibitors on thylakoid membranes of two common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.) biotypes. Weed Sci. 27:216–218.Google Scholar
22. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–616.Google Scholar
23. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1979. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:615–628.Google Scholar
24. Souza Machado, V., Arntzen, C. J., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, G. R. 1978. Comparative triazine effects upon system II photochemistry on chloroplasts of two common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Sci. 26:318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
26. Thai, K. M., Jana, S., and Naylor, J. M. 1985. Variability for response to herbicides in wild oat (Avena fatua) populations. Weed Sci. 33:829–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 25:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar