Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:23:22.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of High Levels of Metribuzin Tolerance in Lentil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Larn S. McMurray Open the ORCID record for Larn S. McMurray [Opens in a new window] ,
Christopher Preston ,
Albert Vandenberg ,
Dili Mao ,
Klaus H. Oldach ,
Kendra S. Meier  and
Jeffrey G. Paull
Larn S. McMurray*
Affiliation:
Ph.D Candidate, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia; and Research Scientist, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Clare, SA, Australia
Christopher Preston
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia
Albert Vandenberg
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Dili Mao
Affiliation:
Research Officer, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Clare, SA, Australia
Klaus H. Oldach
Affiliation:
Principal Scientist, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia
Kendra S. Meier
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Sciences/Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Jeffrey G. Paull
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Larn S. McMurray, Global Grain Genetics, Clare, SA 5453, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is an important and expanding crop in southern Australia and a significant crop in western Canada. Currently, production in both countries is limited by an inability to effectively control weeds, due in part to a lack of registered safe and effective herbicides. Metribuzin is a broad-spectrum herbicide providing an alternative weed control option to the imidazolinones, but it has low crop safety in lentil. Two methods, germplasm screening using a hydroponic sand assay and field screening of a large mutated population of the Australian cultivar ‘PBA Flash’ were initially used to identify lines with putative metribuzin tolerance over current cultivars. Dose–response experiments showed the germplasm line SP1333 had GR50 (the rate required to reduce dry weight 50%) values up to four times higher than PBA Flash. However, the mutation selections M043 and M009 had GR50 values more than 25 times higher than PBA Flash. A field study in Canada, under conditions of induced shade and no shade 72 h before POST application of metribuzin, confirmed the intermediate level of tolerance in SP1333 and the high level in the two mutant lines compared with 20 Canadian and Australian genotypes. This relative increase in metribuzin tolerance of the two mutant lines over the parent cultivar is higher than all previous reports in a range of crop species. The development of large mutant populations combined with large M2 field screens was a successful method for developing high levels of metribuzin tolerance in lentil. The estimated mutation rate of the mutant lines was 9.4×10−8. All three lines are currently being used as parents in lentil breeding programs.

Keywords

Hilary A. Sandler, University of MassachusettsGermplasm screeningherbicide tolerancemutagenesisweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 83 - 90
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al Khatib K, Libbey C, Kadir S, Boydston R (1997) Differential varietal response of green pea (Pisum sativum) to metribuzin. Weed Technol 11:775–781Google Scholar
Barrentine, W, Hartwig, E, Edwards, C Jr Kilen, T (1982) Tolerance of three soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 30:344–348 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ Tardif, FJ (2012) Herbicide cross resistance in weeds. Crop Prot 35:15–28 Google Scholar
Bhoite, RN, Si, P, Stefanova, KT, Siddique, KH Yan, G (2017) Identification of new metribuzin-tolerant wheat (Triticum spp.) genotypes. Crop Pasture Sci 68:401–408 Google Scholar
Boutsalis, P, Gill, G Preston, C (2016) Risk of addiction to IMIs (Group B imidazolinone herbicides). Pages 241–243 in 2016 Grains Research and Development Corporation Grains Research Update: Informed Decisions—Driving Change. Adelaide, SA, Australia: GRDC Google Scholar
Brand, J, Yaduraju, N, Shivakumar, B McMurray, L (2007) Weed Management. Pages 159–172 in Yadav SS, McNeil DL, Stevenson PC, eds. Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht: Springer Google Scholar
Caldwell, C O’Sullivan, P (1985) Differential tolerance of two barley cultivars to metribuzin. Can J Plant Sci 65:415–421 Google Scholar
Coble, HD Schrader, JW (1973) Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci 21:308–309 Google Scholar
DeJong, H (1983) Inheritance of sensitivity to the herbicide metribuzin in cultivated diploid potatoes. Euphytica 32:41–48 Google Scholar
Devine, M (2005) Why are there not more herbicide-tolerant crops? Pest Manag Sci 61:312–317 Google Scholar
Devine, MD, Duke, SO Fedtke, C, eds (1992) Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 441 p Google Scholar
Duke, S (2005) Taking stock of herbicide resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manag Sci 61:211–218 Google Scholar
Elkoca, E, Kantar, F Zengin, H (2005) Weed control in lentil (Lens culinaris) in eastern Turkey. New Zeal J Crop Hort 33:223–231 Google Scholar
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Production Crops. FAOSTAT Statistics Database. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.Google Scholar
Gawronski, S, Haderlie, L Stark, J (1987) Metribuzin metabolism as the basis for tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Weed Res 27:49–55 Google Scholar
Gawronski, SW (1983) Tolerance of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 31:525–527 Google Scholar
Gawronski, SW, Haderlie, LC, Callihan, RH Dwelle, RB (1985) Metribuzin absorption, translocation, and distribution in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Sci 33:629–634 Google Scholar
[GRDC] Grains Research and Development Corporation (2015) National Variety Trials. https://www.nvtonline.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SA-Pulses-2015.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2017Google Scholar
Hanson, B Thill, D (2001) Effects of imazethapyr and pendimethalin on lentil (Lens culinaris), pea (Pisum sativum), and a subsequent winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop. Weed Technol 15:190–194 Google Scholar
Hardcastle, W (1974) Differences in the tolerance of metribuzin by varieties of soybeans. Weed Res 14:181–184 Google Scholar
Harrison, JH, Jones, A Dukes, P (1985) Differential response of six sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 33:730–733 Google Scholar
Harrison, JHF (1988) Metribuzin tolerance within the genus Vigna . Weed Technol 2:59–63 Google Scholar
Hatzios, KK Penner, D (1988) Metribuzin. Pages 191–243 in Kearney PC, Kaufman DD, eds. Herbicides: Their Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker Google Scholar
Isbell, RF (2016) The Australian Soil Classification. 2nd ed. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing. 152 p Google Scholar
Ivany, J (1979) Response of four potato cultivars to metribuzin time and rate of application. Can J Plant Sci 59:417–422 Google Scholar
Kleemann, S Gill, G (2007) Differential tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to metribuzin. Aust J Agric Res 58:452–456 Google Scholar
Knott, C Halila, H (1988) Weeds in food legumes: problems, effects and control. Pages 535–548 in Summerfield RJ, ed. World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Google Scholar
Mangeot, B, Slife, F Rieck, C (1979) Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci 27:267–269 Google Scholar
Materne, M, McMurray, L, Brouwer, J, Bretag, T, Brand, J, MacLean, B Hawthorne, W (2011) Lentil in Australia. Grain Legumes July(57):52–55 Google Scholar
McDonald, G, Hollaway, K McMurray, L (2007) Increasing plant density improves weed competition in lentil (Lens culinaris). Aust J Exp Agric 47:48–56 Google Scholar
McMurray, L, Dare, M, Materne, M Eckermann, P (2009) Improving herbicide tolerance in pulses. In Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Plant Bleeding & 11th SABRAO Conference, 9–13 August 2009. Cairns, QLD, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
McNeil, D, Hill, G, Materne, M McKenzie, B (2007) Global production and world trade. Pages 95–105 in Yadav SS, McNeil DL, Stevenson PC, eds. Lentil: An Ancient Crop for Modern Times. Dordrecht: Springer Google Scholar
Meier, KS (2016) Characterizing Metribuzin Herbicide Tolerance in Lentil. M.Sc thesis. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan. 75 pGoogle Scholar
Mohamed, E, Nourai, A, Mohamed, G, Mohamed, M Saxena, M (1997) Weeds and weed management in irrigated lentil in northern Sudan. Weed Res 37:211–218.Google Scholar
Motsenbocker, C Monaco, T (1993) Differential tolerance of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) clones to metribuzin. Weed Technol 7:349–354 Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, F, Kaiser, W, Clement, S Summerfield, R (1995) Production and breeding of lentil. Adv Agron 54:283–332 Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, F, Mihov, M, Vandenberg, A, Tullu, A Materne, M (2009) Improvement in developed countries. Pages 137–154 in Erskine W, Muehlbauer F, Sarker A, Sharma B, eds. The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CABI International Google Scholar
North Dakota State University (2014) North Dakota Weed Control Guide. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University. 135 pGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, M Warren, G (1980) Effect of light on the response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and two weed species to metribuzin. Weed Sci 28:186–189 Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.1. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org.html. Accessed: June 21, 2015Google Scholar
Runyan, T McNeil, W (1982) Differential tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 30:94–97 Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Guide to Crop Protection. Regina, SK, Canada: Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 416 pGoogle Scholar
Savage, KE (1976) Adsorption and mobility of metribuzin in soil. Weed Sci 24:525–528 Google Scholar
Schroeder, J, Banks, P Nichols, R (1985) Soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar response to metribuzin. Weed Sci 34:66–69 Google Scholar
Sharma, SR, Singh, S, Aggarwal, N, Kushwah, A Kumar, S (2017) Inherent variability among different lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes against tolerance to metribuzin herbicide. Biochem Cell Arch 17:49–56 Google Scholar
Si, P, Buirchell, B Sweetingham, M. (2009) Improved metribuzin tolerance in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) by induced mutation and field selection. Field Crops Res 113:282–286 Google Scholar
Si, P, Pan, G Sweetingham, M (2011) Semi-dominant genes confer additive tolerance to metribuzin in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) mutants. Euphytica 177:411–418 Google Scholar
Si, P, Sweetingham, M, Buirchell, B, Bowran, D Piper, T (2006) Genotypic variation in metribuzin tolerance in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Aust J Exp Agric 46:85–92 Google Scholar
Souza Machado, V, Nonnecke, I Phatak, S (1978) Bioassay to screen tomato seedlings for tolerance to metribuzin. Can J Plant Sci 58:823–828 Google Scholar
Swanton, C, Harker, K Anderson, R (1993) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol 7:537–542 Google Scholar
White, B, ed (2015) Field Crop Herbicide Guide. 9th ed. Leederville, WA: Kondinin Group. Pp 456–462 Google Scholar
Yasin, J, Al-Thahabi, S, Abu-Irmaileh, B, Saxena, M Haddad, N (1995) Chemical weed-control in chickpea and lentil. Int J Pest Manage 41:60–65 Google Scholar
Yenish, J, Brand, J, Pala, M, Haddad, A, Erskine, W, Muehlbauer, F, Sarker, A Sharma, B (2009) Weed management. Pages 326–342 in Erskine W, Muehlbauer F, Sarker A, Sharma B, eds. The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK: CABI International Google Scholar