Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:33:12.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crop Response and Arsenic Uptake Following Soil Incorporation of MSMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. S. Baker
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Miss. Agr. and For. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776
W. L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Miss. Agr. and For. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776
D. H. Bowman
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Miss. Agr. and For. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776
W. L. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Miss. Agr. and For. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776
J. V. Pettiet
Affiliation:
Delta Branch of the Miss. Agr. and For. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

Five crops were grown for three seasons following a single soil-incorporated application of MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate). Crop sensitivity to soil arsenic decreased as follows: snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Early Gallatin’ and ‘Tenderette’); rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Dawn’ and ‘Starbonnet’); soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Lee 68′]; potatoes (Solarium tuberosum L. ‘Red LaSoda’ and ‘Red Pontiac’); and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 7A’). Over the 3-yr period, yield of snap beans was reduced 8, 14, and 85% below the untreated check where MSMA had been incorporated initially at 22, 45, and 269 kg/ha, respectively. Similar reductions in yield of rice were 18, 25, and 55%. Soybean and potato yields were significantly reduced only at the highest rate of MSMA while cotton yields were unaffected. Arsenic content in the edible portion of the crops decreased as follows: rice, snap beans, potatoes, soybeans, and cotton. The arsenic content in crops from the highest MSMA plots seldom exceeded twice that from the untreated plots.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis. 11th Ed. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. Washington, D.C. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
2. Chisolm, D. 1972. Lead arsenic and copper content of crops grown on lead arsenate treated and untreated soils. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:583588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dorman, C. and Coleman, R. 1939. The effect of calcium arsenate upon the yield of cotton on different soil types. J. Amer. Soc Agron. 31:966971.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, L.R. and Hiltbold, A.E. 1969. Arsenic content of soil and crops following use of methanearsonate herbicide. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 33:279282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Luh, M.D., Baker, R.A., and Henley, D.E. 1973. Arsenic analysis and toxicity – a review. Sci. of Total Environ. 2:112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Ou, Shu Huang. 1972. Rice Diseases. Kew, Commonwealth Mycological Institute. 368 pp.Google Scholar
7. Raab, H. and Sandberg, G. 1972. Pre-plant applications of MSMA as they affect yields and residues in cotton and grain sorghum. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:428.Google Scholar
8. Reed, J.F. and Sturgis, M.B. 1936. Toxicity from arsenic compounds to rice on flooded soil. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 28:432436.Google Scholar
9. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1970. Federal Register 35:18370. December 3.Google Scholar
10. Von Endt, D.W., Kearney, P.C., and Kaufman, D.D. 1968. Degradation of monosodium methanearsonic acid by soil microorganisms. J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:1720.Google Scholar
11. Woolson, E.A. 1973. Arsenic phytotoxicity and uptake in six vegetable crops. Weed Sci. 21:524527.Google Scholar
12. Woolson, E.A., Axley, J.H., and Kearney, P.C. 1971. The chemistry and phytotoxicity of arsenic in soils. I. Contaminated field soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 35:938943.Google Scholar