Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:56:37.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Persimmon with Various Herbicides and Methods of Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Elroy J. Peters*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Columbia, Missouri
J. F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Columbia, Missouri
*
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.

Abstract

We compared various rates of 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoic acid (2,3,6-TBA), 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba), and 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), and various methods of application on persimmon (Diospyros virginiana L.). Single rates of 2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid (fenac) and (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4,5-T) also were included. In one experiment, 8 lb/A of dicamba injected into the soil killed significantly more persimmon than the same rate applied to the soil in 4-inch bands. Otherwise, with given herbicides at comparable rates, defoliation and mortality of persimmon were similar with all methods of soil application. Foliage applications of dicamba or picloram at relatively low rates caused defoliation and mortality of persimmon equal to soil applications of dicamba or picloram at high rates. Dicamba was more effective than equal rates of 2,3,6-TBA for killing persimmon. Picloram at 2 lb/A and dicamba at 4 lb/A, as foliage applications, defoliated and killed persimmon to nearly the same extent. Fenac was relatively ineffective for killing persimmon. Soil treatments with picloram and dicamba killed 22 to 30% more persimmon when applied in summer than when applied in spring. Spring and summer foliage applications of dicamba and 2,3,6-TBA caused similar defoliation and mortality of persimmon, but mortality of persimmon was somewhat higher with spring than with summer foliage applications of picloram. Summer basal treatment with 2,4,5-T killed more persimmon than spring basal treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution from the Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. Agr. in cooperation with the Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Approved by the Director. Journal Series No. 5742.

References

Literature Cited

1. Elder, W. C. and Dreessen, Jack. 1952. Effect of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on persimmons. Res. Rept. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 9:54.Google Scholar
2. Elder, W. C. and Gassaway, J. E. 1950. Effect of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on persimmon trees. Res. Rept. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 7:236.Google Scholar
3. Darrow, R. A. and Frey, W. K. 1951. Dormant season treatment of persimmon. Res. Rept. No. Centr. Weed Cont. Conf. 8:150.Google Scholar
4. Gassaway, James E. and Elder, W. C. 1951. Effects of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on persimmon. Res. Rept. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 8:154.Google Scholar
5. Haas, R. H., Darrow, R. A. and Lehman, S. K. 1964. Evaluation of herbicides for the control of common persimmon. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 17:278283.Google Scholar
6. Nichols, J. Milford. 1957. Control of woody vegetation. Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 639. 26 p.Google Scholar
7. Zahnley, J. W. and McCall, G. L. 1950. Response of persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) and certain other species of trees to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T applied as basal sprays. Proc. No. Centr. Weed. Contr. Conf. 7:250.Google Scholar