Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:20:35.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Horse Purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) and Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rajender S. Balyan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Haryana Agricultural Univ., Hisar-125004, India
Ram K. Malik
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Haryana Agricultural Univ., Hisar-125004, India

Abstract

Four postemergence herbicides were evaluated for control of horse purslane and barnyardgrass occurring alone and in combination in three separate field experiments at Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (India). Haloxyfop, fluazifop, and sethoxydim controlled barnyardgrass. Fomesafen controlled horse purslane most effectively when applied at the two-branch stage of horse purslane in mung bean. Combinations of haloxyfop, fluazifop, or sethoxydim with fomesafen applied at the five-branch stage of horse purslane and two-leaf stage of barnyardgrass controlled both weeds. Mung bean treated with fomesafen at 250 g ae/ha plus haloxyfop at 190 or 250 g ae/ha, fluazifop at 750 or 1000 g ae/ha, or sethoxydim at 750 g or 1000 g ae/ha produced dry weights, pods/plant, and grain yield similar to weed-free mung bean.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. N. 1982. Comparisons of four herbicides applied postemergence for grass control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:8082.Google Scholar
2. Balyan, R. S. 1985. Studies on the biology and competitive behaviour of horse purslane (T. portulacastrum Linn.). Ph.D. Thesis. Haryana Agric. Univ. Hisar (India).Google Scholar
3. Balyan, R. S. 1987. Weed control in rabi pulses. Farmers and Parliament. 22(1):1719.Google Scholar
4. Balyan, R. S. and Bhan, V. M. 1986. Emergence, growth, and reproduction of horse purslane as influenced by environmental conditions. Weed Sci. 34:516517.Google Scholar
5. Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., Vedwan, R.P.S., and Bhan, V. M., 1987. Postemergence herbicides for weed control in mung bean. Trop. Pest. Manage. 33:2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124130.Google Scholar
7. Dhingra, K. K., Sekhon, H.S., and Tripathi, H. P. 1984. Effect of herbicides for weed control in mung bean. Indian J. Weed Sci. 16:116121.Google Scholar
8. Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides for soybeans. Weed Sci. 31 557561.Google Scholar
9. Package of practices for rainy season (Kharif) crops 1985. Haryana Agric. Univ. Hisar (India). Pages 7888.Google Scholar
10. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Pages 592593 in Panse, V. G., ed. ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
11. Singh, R. C. and Faroda, A. S. 1977. Effect of different weed control methods on growth and yield of green gram. Indian J. Weed Sci. 9:3337.Google Scholar
12. Yadav, S. K., Bhan, V. M., and Singh, S. P. 1982. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in mung bean. Tropical Pest Manage. 4:359361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar