Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:59:27.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Cruciferae Weeds in Canola (Brassica napus) with DPX A7881

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1

Abstract

Postemergence control of broadleaf weeds in canola with DPX A7881 was studied under controlled-environment and field conditions. DPX A7881 controlled weeds of the Cruciferae family such as wild mustard, field pennycress, and flixweed, which are not controlled with existing herbicides used for weed control in canola. Weed control was better when DPX A7881 was applied at the two-leaf than at the six-leaf stage of the weeds. At the two-leaf stage, control of flixweed was achieved with 15 g ai/ha of DPX A7881; 20 to 30 g ai/ha was required for control of wild mustard and field pennycress. Control of redroot pigweed required 30 g ai/ha. Common lambsquarters was not controlled in this study with DPX A7881 up to 60 g ai/ha. Control of weeds with DPX A7881 increased canola yields in this study without altering the important quality components: oil content, 1000-kernel weight, and green seed content. DPX A7881 provides a postemergence alternative to existing herbicides for broadleaf weed control in canola.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1988. Guide to crop protection in Alberta. Agdex 606-1, 7000 – 113 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 5T6.Google Scholar
2. Ambach, R. M. 1987. Weed control in canola with DPX A7881. Res. Rep., Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) 1:263264.Google Scholar
3. Beversdorf, W. D. and Hume, D. J. 1984. OAC Triton spring canola. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:10071009.Google Scholar
4. Beversdorf, W. D., Hume, D. J., and Donnelly-Vanderloo, M. J. 1989. Agronomic performance of triazine-resistant and susceptible reciprocal spring canola hybrids. Crop Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
5. Blackshaw, R. E., Anderson, G. W., and Dekker, J. 1987. Interference of Sinapis arvensis L. and Chenopodium album L. in spring canola (Brassica napus L.). Weed Res. 27:207213.Google Scholar
6. Chow, P.N.P. and Dorrell, D. G. 1979. Response of wild oat (Avena fatua), flax (Linum usitatissimum), and canola (Brassica campestris and B. napus) to diclofop-methyl. Weed Sci. 27:212215.Google Scholar
7. Dew, D. A. and Keys, C. H. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:10051006.Google Scholar
8. Harker, K. N. 1986. Control of stinkweed in canola. Res. Rep., Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) 1:256257.Google Scholar
9. Harker, K. N. 1987. Broadleaved weed control in canola with trifluralin and DPX A7881. Res. Rep., Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) 1:297298.Google Scholar
10. Hutchison, J. M., Peter, C. J., Amuti, K. S., Hageman, L. H., and Roy, G. A. 1987. DPX-A7881: A new herbicide for oilseed rape. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1:6367.Google Scholar
11. MacDonald, L. D. 1985. Postemergence broadleaf control in canola. Res. Rep., Expert Comm. Weeds (West. Sect.) 1:287.Google Scholar
12. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dicloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989993.Google Scholar
13. O'Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., and Weiss, G. M. 1985. Influence of clopyralid on several yield and quality characteristics of Altex, Candle and Regent rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:633639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Parsons, I. M. 1987. Use of DPX-A7881 for weed control in spring oilseed rape in Canada. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 3:809814.Google Scholar
15. Peterson, E. F. 1987. DPX-A7881, a new rape herbicide. Proc. Danish Plant Prot. Conf.—Weeds 3:710713.Google Scholar
16. Ray, T. B. 1987. Site of action of chlorsulfuron—inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:827831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Rose, S. P. and Bell, J. M. 1982. Reproduction of mice fed low erucic acid rapeseed oil contaminated with weed seed oils. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62:617624.Google Scholar
18. Shires, A., Bell, J. M., Keith, M. O., and McGregor, D. I. 1982. Rapeseed dockage. Effects of feeding raw and processed wild mustard and stinkweed on growth and feed utilization of mice. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62:275285.Google Scholar
19. Stone, J. R., Parsons, I. M., and Prins, D. J. 1985. DPX A7881: A new herbicide for use in oilseed rape. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:17.Google Scholar
20. Swanton, C. J. and Chandler, K. Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) control in spring rapeseed with DPX A7881 and AC 222,293. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:7. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
21. Swanton, C. J. and Chandler, K. 1989. Control of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) in canola (Brassica napus L.) with postemergence herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
22. Thomas, P. 1984. Weeds, insects and diseases of canola. Pages 10011064 in Canola growers manual. Canola Counc. Canada, 433 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 1B3.Google Scholar