Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:36:25.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of Velvetleaf, Prickly Sida, and Venice Mallow in Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. J. Eaton ,
O. G. Russ  and
K. C. Feltner
B. J. Eaton
Affiliation:
Lilly Res. Lab., Eli Lilly and Co., Greenfield, IN 46140
O. G. Russ
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
K. C. Feltner
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59715
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed competition in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Clark 63′] with planted stands of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.), prickly sida (Sida spinosa L.), and Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum L.) is reported. Weeds were planted 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 days after soybeans and competed until soybeans matured. Soybean seed yields were reduced 720, 250, and 230 kg/ha by velvetleaf, Venice mallow, and prickly sida, respectively. Weeds that emerged with soybeans reduced yields 1,010 kg/ha. Weeds planted 10 days later reduced yields 480 kg/ha, but weeds planted 20 to 40 days after soybeans did not significantly reduced yield. Soybean yields were reduced regardless of weed placement in or between soybean rows. Weed competition reduced numbers of soybean pods per plant more than other soybean-yield components.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 224 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W.L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybean. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O.C. and Colville, W.L. 1964. Yield components and composition of soybeans as affected by cultural and chemical weed control practices. Agron. J. 56:348–351.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O.C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294:297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dawson, J.H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.Google Scholar
5. Eaton, B.J., Feltner, K.C., and Russ, O.G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.Google Scholar
6. Ivy, H.W. and Baker, R.S. 1972. Prickly sida competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 20:137–139.Google Scholar
7. Knake, E.L. and Slife, F.W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–27.Google Scholar
8. Knake, E.L. and Slife, F.W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybean. Weeds 13:331–334.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
10. Staniforth, D.W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–192.Google Scholar
11. Staniforth, D.W. and Weber, C.R. 1966. Effects of annual weeds on growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:567–571.Google Scholar
12. Thurlow, D.L. and Buchanan, G.A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.Google Scholar
13. Weber, C.R. and Staniforth, D.W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wilson, H.P. and Cole, R.H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.Google Scholar