Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:27:33.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chromatographic Determination of Metobromuron and Metabolites in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stanley E. Katz  and
Carol A. Fassbender
Stanley E. Katz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Bureau of Conservation and Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Rutgers-The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Carol A. Fassbender
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Bureau of Conservation and Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Rutgers-The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chromatographic procedures were developed for use in the laboratory studies of the breakdown of N-(p-bromophenyl)-N′-methoxy-N-methoxyurea (metobromuron) in soils. Both thin-layer and gas chromatographic procedures were developed to determine the known and/or suspected metabolic products occurring from the microbiological transformations in soil. Extraction of 3 soils, after 5 days of equilibration, yielded all the metabolites. Neither the gas chromatographic or thin-layer procedures were affected by soil extractives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1968 , pp. 401 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartha, R. and Pramer, D. 1965. Features of a flask for measuring the persistence and biological effects of pesticides in soil. Soil Sci. 100:68–70.Google Scholar
2. Dalton, R. L., Evans, A. W., and Rhodes, R. C. 1966. Disappearance of diuron in cotton field soils. Weeds 14:31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Geissbühler, H., Haselbach, C., Aebi, H., and Ebner, L. 1963. The fate of N′-(4-chlorophenoxy)-phenyl-N,N-dimethylurea (C–1983) in soils and plants. III. Breakdown in soils and plants. Weed. Res. 3:277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Sheets, T. J. 1964. Review of disappearance of substituted urea herbicides from soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:30–33.Google Scholar
6. Sherbourne, H. R. and Freed, V. H. 1954. Adsorption of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar