Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:59:39.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical versus Mechanical Fallow of Abandoned Croplands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. C. Everson
Affiliation:
Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station
D. N. Hyder
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division
H. R. Gardner
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Conservation Research Division
R. E. Bement
Affiliation:
Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station Crops Research Division, Fort Collins

Abstract

Chemical fallow with 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon) reduced the yield of non-seeded perennials more than mechanical fallow with sweep blades in the year of treatment. However, plants derived from seed left at the soil surface resulted in greater yields of nonseeded perennials on chemical than on mechanical-fallow plots the year following treatment. Each fallow method increased annual herbage yields the year after treatment as compared with directly-seeded plots. Litter was greatly reduced in the year of and in the year after mechanical fallow. However, the amount of litter on the chemical fallow plots was very high in the year of treatment and declined in the succeeding year. Success of seeding crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch, ex Link) Schult.] was slightly better after mechanical than after chemical fallow. Yield of crested wheatgrass in the year after planting was about the same for the mechanical fallow and the higher rate (10 lb/A) of dalapon. There was more available soil moisture to a depth of 30 inches in fallowed than in non-treated plots; but the small amount of moisture saved by fallow probably is immaterial to seeding success.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. and Bohmont, D. W. 1957. Chemical summer fallow. Wyoming Agr. Exp. Sta. Mimeo. Circ. No. 79. 6 p.Google Scholar
2. Army, T. J., Wiese, A. F., and Hanks, R. J. 1961. Effect of tillage and chemical weed control practices on soil moisture losses during the fallow period. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. Proc. 25:410413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Barnes, O. K., Bohont, D. W., and Rauzi, F. 1955. Effect of chemical and tillage summer fallow on water infiltration rates. Agron. J. 47:235236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bement, R. E., Barmington, R. D., Everson, A. C., Hylton, L. O. Jr., and Remmenga, E. E. 1965. Seeding of abandoned croplands in the Central Great Plains. J. Range Manage. 18:5358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Costello, David F. 1944. Natural revegetation of abandoned plowed land in the mixed prairie association of northeastern Colorado. Ecology 25:312326.Google Scholar
6. Hyder, D. N. and Everson, A. C. 1968. Chemical fallow of abandoned croplands on the short-grass plains. Weed Sci. 16:531533.Google Scholar
7. McGinnies, William J. 1962. Effect of seedbed firming on the establishment of crested wheatgrass seedlings. J. Range Manage. 15:230234.Google Scholar
8. Wicks, G. A. 1965. Herbicides during the fallow season in wheat rotations. Crops and Soils. 17:1314.Google Scholar
9. Wiese, A. F. and Army, T. J. 1958. Effect of tillage and chemical weed control practices on soil moisture storage and losses. Agron. J. 50:465468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wiese, A. F. and Army, T. J. 1960. Effect of chemical fallow on soil moisture storage. Agron. J. 52:612613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Wiese, A. F., Bard, J. J., and Army, T. J. 1960. Chemical fallow in the Southern Great Plains. Weeds 8:284290.Google Scholar