Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:47:58.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical and Physical Effects of the Accumulation of Glyphosate in Common Milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) Root Buds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Waldecker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

Distribution of 14C-glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] in chemically treated and physically manipulated common milkweed [Asclepias syriaca (L.) ♯ ASCSY] was studied in greenhouse and growth chamber experiments. Pretreatment with glyphosate at 0.6 and 1.1 kg ae/ha 3 days prior to 14C-glyphosate application to leaves reduced the concentration of 14C recovered from shoots and leaves above the 14C-glyphosate-treated leaves but had no influence on the concentration of 14C in proximal root buds. Partial removal of the shoot and root prior to the application of 14C-glyphosate increased bud respiration and the concentration of 14C in the proximal root buds. Proximal root buds treated with 1 mM of 6-benzyl-aminopurine (BAP) for 6 days (3 days prior to application of 14C-glyphosate) contained seven times more 14C/mg than root buds of BAP-untreated plants, suggesting that dormant buds could be chemically stimulated to accumulate higher concentrations of glyphosate. BAP-treated buds were killed by foliar applications of glyphosate at 1.1 kg/ha, indicating that proximal root buds can be stimulated to acquire lethal concentrations of glyphosate.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baur, J. R., Bovey, R. W., and Veech, J. A. 1977. Growth responses in sorghum and wheat induced by glyphosate. Weed Sci. 25:238240.Google Scholar
2. Bhowmik, P. C. 1982. Herbicidal control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 30:349351.Google Scholar
3. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1976. The biology of Canadian weeds. 19. Asclepias syriaca L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:579589.Google Scholar
4. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1973. Regrowth potential of common milkweed seedlings in growthroom conditions. Res. Rpt., Can. Weed Comm. East. Sect. Page 292.Google Scholar
5. Bhowmilk, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1969. Root bud dormancy in milkweed. Res. Rpt., Can. Weed Comm. East Sect. Page 247.Google Scholar
6. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bandeen, J. D. 1970. Life history of common milkweed. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 6.Google Scholar
7. Caseley, J. 1972. The effect of environmental factors on the performance of glyphosate against Agropyron repens. Proc. 11th Br. Weed Control Conf. Pages 641647.Google Scholar
8. Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.Google Scholar
9. Coupland, D. and Caseley, J. C. 1975. Reduction of silica and increase in tillering induced in Agropyron repens by glyphosate. J. Exp. Bot. 26:138144.Google Scholar
10. Cramer, G. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 29:636640.Google Scholar
11. Grayburn, W. S., Green, P. B., and Steucek, G. 1982. Bud induction with cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 69:682686.Google Scholar
12. Groh, H. and Dore, W. G. 1945. A milkweed survey in Ontario and adjacent Quebec. Sci. Agric. 25:463481.Google Scholar
13. Groh, H. 1943. Notes on common milkweed. Sci. Agric. 25: 625632.Google Scholar
14. Harrison, M. A. and Kaufman, P. B. 1980. Hormonal regulation of lateral bud (tiller) release in oats (Avena sativa L.). Plant Physiol. 66:11231127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Langer, R.H.M., Prasad, P. C., and Laude, H. M. 1973. Effects of kinetin on tiller bud elongation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann. Bot. 37:565571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. McIntyre, G. I. 1971. Apical dominance in the rhizome of Agropyron repens. Some factors affecting the degree of dominance in isolated rhizomes. Can. J. Bot. 49:99109.Google Scholar
17. Montaldi, E. R. 1971. Kinetin induction of bud differentiation on roots of entire plants. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 67:4344.Google Scholar
18. Morris, D. A. and Winfield, P. J. 1972. Kinetin transport to axillary buds of dwarf pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Exp. Bot. 23: 346355.Google Scholar
19. Peterson, R. L. 1969. Bud formation on root segments of Ophioglossum petiolatum: effect of application site of cytokinins and auxin. Can. J. Bot. 47:12851287.Google Scholar
20. Pillay, I. and Railton, I. D. 1983. Complete release of axillary buds from apical dominance in intact, light-grown seedlings of Pisum sativum L. following a single application of cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 71:972974.Google Scholar
21. Rogan, P. G. and Smith, D. L. 1976. Experimental control of bud inhibition in rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 78:113121.Google Scholar
22. Sachs, T. and Thimann, K. V. 1967. The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance. Am. J. Bot. 54:136144.Google Scholar
23. Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195200.Google Scholar
24. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Teo, C.K.H., Nishimoto, R. K., and Tang, C. S. 1974. Bud inhibition of Cyperus rotundus L. tubers by inhibitor B or abscisic acid and the reversal of these effects by N-6-benzyl adenine. Weed Res. 14:173179.Google Scholar
26. Teo, C.K.H., Bendixen, L. E., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1973. Bud sprouting and growth of purple nutsedge altered by benzyl-adenine. Weed Sci. 21:1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wickson, M. and Thimann, K. V. 1958. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiol. Plant 11: 6274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Wyrill, J. B. III and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar