Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:57:42.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of PPO-Inhibitor–Resistant Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) Response to Soil-Applied PPO-Inhibiting Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

R. Joseph Wuerffel ,
Julie M. Young ,
Joseph L. Matthews  and
Bryan G. Young
R. Joseph Wuerffel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Julie M. Young
Affiliation:
Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Joseph L. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Botany and Plant Pathology Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Waterhemp resistance to foliar applications of protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)–inhibiting herbicides has become increasingly disconcerting given the widespread distribution of glyphosate resistance. Fortunately, soil-residual PPO-inhibiting herbicides remain efficacious in waterhemp populations resistant to PPO-inhibiting herbicides; however, these herbicides should theoretically select for the resistant biotype as herbicide concentrations diminish in the soil. Accordingly, the objectives of this research were twofold: (1) evaluate the efficacy of three PPO-inhibiting herbicides, foliar- and soil-applied, on PPO-resistant (PPO-R) and PPO-susceptible (PPO-S) waterhemp, and (2) investigate the differential effects of PPO-inhibiting herbicides on an R biotype and an S biotype during several discrete developmental events relevant to soil–residual herbicide activity (i.e., radicle protrusion, radicle elongation, and waterhemp emergence). Greenhouse and growth chamber experiments indicated that the R biotype was least sensitive to the diphenylether herbicide fomesafen, followed by sulfentrazone and flumioxazin; however, fomesafen plus s-metolachlor improved soil-residual efficacy over fomesafen alone. Growth stage considerably influenced the R : S ratio, decreasing from 38× to 3.4×, when comparing ratios generated from foliar applications and soil-residual applications measuring radicle protrusion, respectively. Overall, this research supports the use of full soil-residual herbicide rates, reinforcing the importance of best management practices to manage the spread of herbicide resistance.

Keywords

Flumioxazinfomesafenglyphosates-metolachlorsulfentrazonetall waterhemp, Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer (syn. rudis) AMATA.common waterhemptall waterhempherbicide resistance
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 511 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anjum, T, Bajwa, R (2005) Importance of germination indices in interpretation of allelochemical effects. Int J Agric Biol. 7:417–419 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Friesen, LF, Nawolsky, KM, Morrison, IN (1990) A rapid bioassay to detect trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Technol. 4:505–508 Google Scholar
Bernards, ML, Crespo, RJ, Kruger, GR, Gaussoin, R, Tranel, PJ (2012) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population resistant to 2,4-D. Weed Sci. 60:379–384 Google Scholar
Bewley, JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell. 9:1055–1066 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackshaw, RL, O'Donovan, JT, Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Stougaard, RN (2006) Reduced herbicide doses in field crops: a review. Weed Biol Manag. 6:10–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2010) Fall and spring preplant herbicide applications influence spring emergence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol. 24:11–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, FE, Daga, PR, Duke, SO, Lee, RM, Tranel, PJ, Doerksen, RJ (2010) Biochemical and structural consequences of a glycine deletion in the α-8 helix of protoporphyrinogen oxidase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1804:1548–1556 Google Scholar
Dayan, FE, Duke, SO (2010) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Pages 1733–1751 in Krieger, R, Doull, J, Hodgson, E, Maibach, H, Reiter, L, Ritter, L, Ross, J, Slikker, WJ, Van Hemmen, J, eds. Haye's Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. San Diego Academic CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, FE, Owens, DK, Tranel, PJ, Preston, C, Duke, SO (2014) Evolution of resistance to phytoene desaturase and protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors—state of knowledge. Pest Manag Sci. 70:1358–1366 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SO, Lydon, J, Becerril, JM, Sherman, TD, Lehnen, LP, Matsumoto, H (1991) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 39:465–473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, JS, Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2006) Protox-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) response to herbicides applied at different growth stages. Weed Sci. 54:793–799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenner, M, Pons, TL (2000) Seed responses to light. Pages 237–260 in Fenner, M, ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. 2nd edn. Wallingford, UK CABI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, DE, Powles, SB (2014) Fluridone: a combination germination stimulant and herbicide for problem fields? Pest Manag Sci. 70:1418–1424 Google Scholar
Guillaumot, D, Guillon, S, Déplanque, T, Vanhee, C, Gumy, C, Masquelier, D, Morsomme, P, Batoko, H (2009) The Arabidopsis TSPO-related protein is a stress and abscisic acid-regulated, endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi-localized membrane protein. Plant J. 60:242–256 Google Scholar
Hager, AG, Wax, LM, Bollero, GA, Stoller, EW (2003) Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20 Google Scholar
Harder, DB, Nelson, KA, Smeda, RJ (2012) Management options and factors affecting control of a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) biotype resistant to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Int J Agron. 2012:1–7 Google Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Buhler, DD, Stoltenberg, DE (1999) Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578–584 Google Scholar
Hausman, NE, Singh, S, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Kaundun, SS, Polge, ND, Thomas, DA, Hager, AG (2011) Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Illinois, United States. Pest Manag Sci. 67:258–261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2014) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed April 2, 2014.Google Scholar
Koger, CH, Poston, DH, Hayes, RM, Montgomery, RF (2004) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Mississippi. Weed Technol. 18:820–825 Google Scholar
Koornneef, M, Bentsink, L, Hilhorst, H (2002) Seed dormancy and germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 5:33–36 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korkmaz, A, Korkmaz, Y (2009) Promotion by 5-aminolevulenic acid of pepper seed germination and seedling emergence under low-temperature stress. Sci Hortic (Amst) 119:98–102 Google Scholar
Kucera, B, Cohn, MA, Leubner-Metzger, G (2005) Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res. 15:281–307 Google Scholar
Lee, RM, Hager, AG, Tranel, PJ (2008) Prevalence of a novel resistance mechanism to PPO-inhibiting herbicides in waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Weed Sci. 56:371–375 Google Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Bradley, KW (2008) Glyphosate and multiple herbicide resistance in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) populations from Missouri. Weed Sci. 56:582–587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, RG, Knapp, AD, Owen, MDK (2004) Effect of temperature on the germination of common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 52:67–73 Google Scholar
Li, J, Smeda, RJ, Nelson, KA, Dayan, FE (2004) Physiological basis for resistance to diphenyl ether herbicides in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 52:333–338 Google Scholar
Li, Z, Wehtje, GR, Walker, RH (2000) Physiological basis for the differential tolerance of Glycine max to sulfentrazone during seed germination. Weed Sci. 48:281–285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muyonga, KC, Defelice, MS, Sims, BD (1996) Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 44:148–155 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 60:31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Hager, AG, McCormick, JS, Tranel, PJ (2006) A codon deletion confers resistance to herbicides inhibiting protoporphyrinogen oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:12329–12334 Google Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG (2005) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci. 53:30–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, MH, Asaeda, T, Uddin, MN (2010) The allelopathic potential of kudzu (Pueraria montana). Weed Sci. 58:47–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggins, CW, Tranel, PJ (2012) Will the Amaranthus tuberculatus resistance mechanism to PPO-inhibiting herbicides evolve in other Amaranthus species? Int J Agron. 2012:1–7 Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O, Tharp, BE, Kells, JJ, Penner, D (1999) Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agron J. 91:713 Google Scholar
Shoup, DE, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2003) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 51:145–150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay. Weed Technol. 21:567–570 Google Scholar
Tester, M, Morris, C (1987) The penetration of light through soil. Plant, Cell Environ. 10:281–286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thinglum, KA, Riggins, CW, Davis, AS, Bradley, KW, Al-Khatib, K, Tranel, PJ (2011) Wide distribution of the waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) ΔG210 PPX2 mutation, which confers resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 59:22–27 Google Scholar
Tranel, PJ, Riggins, CW, Bell, MS, Hager, AG (2011) Herbicide resistances in Amaranthus tuberculatus: a call for new options. J Agric Food Chem. 59:5808–5812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Jiang, W, Liu, H, Liu, W, Kang, L, Hou, X (2005) Promotion by 5-aminolevulinic acid of germination of pakchoi (Brassica campestris ssp. Chinensis Var. Communis Tsen et Lee) seeds under salt stress. J Integr Plant Biol. 47:1084–1091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, RB, Spencer, GF, Kwolek, WF (1984) Inhibition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) germination and growth by benzyl isothiocyanate, a natural toxicant. Weed Sci. 32:612–615 Google Scholar
Zelaya, IA, Owen, MDK (2005) Differential response of Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq Ex DC) JD Sauer to glyphosate. Pest Manag Sci. 61:936–950 Google Scholar