Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:52:13.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bushkiller (Cayratia japonica) Growth in Interspecific and Intraspecific Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amanda M. West ,
Robert J. Richardson ,
Consuelo Arellano  and
Michael G. Burton
Amanda M. West
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Robert J. Richardson*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Consuelo Arellano
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Michael G. Burton
Affiliation:
Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bushkiller was evaluated under inter- and intraspecific competition. In experiment 1, bushkiller, trumpetcreeper, and wild grape were greenhouse-grown alone and in two or three species mixtures in pots. Of the three species, bushkiller grew the tallest and had the greatest final biomass when grown alone. When all three species were grown together, bushkiller grew over twice the height of trumpetcreeper, over three times the height of wild grape, and over four times the biomass of either competing species. Plots of height over time showed that competition did not affect bushkiller or wild grape growth rate, but trumpetcreeper growth was reduced when grown with bushkiller. In experiment 2, bushkiller was grown in cultures of one, two, and three plants per pot to determine intraspecific competition effects on growth. Final height of bushkiller was not affected by intraspecific competition; however, bushkiller biomass decreased with increasing competition.

Keywords

Bushkiller, Cayratia japonica (Thunb.) GagnepAdditive designexotic invasive speciesperennial vinetarget–neighbor designweed competition
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 195 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aerts, R. 1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs, and plant–soil feedbacks. Exp. Bot. 50:29–37.Google Scholar
Brown, L. E. 1992. Cayratia japonica (Vitaceae) and Paederia foetida (Rubiaceae) adventive in Texas. Phytologia. 72 (1):45–47.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. and Winn, A. A. 2006. A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and noninvasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biol. Inv. 8:797–807.Google Scholar
Connolly, J., Wayne, P., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2001. Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions? Am. Nat. 157:107–125.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5:664–673.Google Scholar
Firbank, L. G. and Watkinson, A. R. 1985. On the analysis of competition within two-species mixtures of plants. Appl. Ecol. 22:503–517.Google Scholar
Forseth, I. N. and Innis, A. F. 2004. Kudzu (Pueraria montana): history, physiology, and ecology combine to make a major ecosystem threat. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:401–413.Google Scholar
Fraser, L. H. and Keddy, P. A. 2005. Can competitive ability predict structure in experimental plant communities? Veg. Sci. 16:571–578.Google Scholar
Freckleton, R. P. and Watkinson, A. R. 2000. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants: an analytical perspective. J. Ecol. 88:386–391.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. J., Connolly, J., Hartnett, D. C., and Weidenhamer, J. D. 1999. Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. Ecology. 87:1–16.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. E. 1996. Competitive ability: definitions, contingency, and correlated traits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 351:1377–1385.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. E. and Landa, K. 1991. Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J. Ecol. 79:1013–1030.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature. 242:344–347.Google Scholar
Guariguata, M. R. and Ostertag, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. For. Ecol. Manage. 148:185–206.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. J. and Goertzen, L. R. 2006. Cayratia japonica (Vitaceae) naturalized in Alabama. Castanea. 71:248–251.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London: Academic Press. 892.Google Scholar
Hsu, Tsai-Wen and Kuoh, C. 1999. Cayratia maritima B.R. Jackes (Vitaceae), a new addition to the flora of Taiwan. Bot. Bull. Acd. Sin. 40:329–332.Google Scholar
Krings, A. and Richardson, R. J. 2006. Cayratia japonica (Vitaceae) new to North Carolina and an updated key to the genera of Vitaceae in the Carolinas. Sida. 22:813–815.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. I. and Urban, D. L. 2006. Edge effects on species composition and exotic species abundance in the North Carolina Piedmont. Biol. Inv. 8:1049–1060.Google Scholar
Riitters, K. H., Wickham, J. D., O'Neill, R. V., Jones, K. B., Smith, E. R., Coulston, J. W., Wade, T. G., and Smith, J. H. 2002. Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems. 5:815–822.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. R., Sargent, R. R., and Sargent, M. B. 1996. Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris). Page 16 in Poole, A. and Gill, F. eds. The Birds of North America, No. 204. Philadelphia: The Birds of North America.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Shinners, L. H. 1964. Cayratia japonica (Vitaceae) in southeastern Louisiana: new to the United States. Sida. 1:384.Google Scholar
USDA-ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. 2008. Germplasm Resources Information Network—(GRIN) [online database]. Beltsville, MD: National Germplasm Resources Laboratory. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?410986. Accessed: April 10, 2008.Google Scholar
USDA-NRCS. 2006. The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov. Baton Rouge, LA: National Plant Data Center. Accessed: August 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Vila, M. and Weiner, J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? —evidence from pairwise experiments. Oikos. 105:229–238.Google Scholar
West, B., Welch, K. B., and Galecki, A. T. 2007. Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 353.Google Scholar