Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:37:05.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brush Response to Spacing and Individual-Plant Herbicide Treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert E. Meyer
Robert E. Meyer*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil-applied herbicides were evaluated for control of blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica Muenchh.), huisache [Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.], honey mesquite [Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC. var. glandulosa (Torr.) Cockerell], live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.), Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata Wendl.), winged elm (Ulmus alata Michx.), and yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.) in Texas. Various spacing of spot treatments of pelleted tebuthiuron {N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N′-dimethylurea} on huisache and live oak and picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) on Macartney rose up to a 2.7-m square grid did not change herbicide effectiveness. Pelleted tebuthiuron at 2.2 kg/ha reduced the canopy of live oak and killed a significant percentage of plants; however, differences among herbicide formulations and distance of placement in a grid were small. On unburned plots, 2.2 kg/ha of tebuthiuron applied as pellets at 2.7-m centers and as a broadcast wettable-powder treatment killed fewer yaupon than pellets applied in most broadcast treatments. In individual-plant treatments, bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil) and picloram solutions at 2 g/plant killed 45% of the yaupon 1.5 to 2 m tall on a fine sandy loam, whereas 0.5 g/plant of either herbicide killed 70% or more of the yaupon plants 1 m tall on a loamy fine sand. Both bromacil and picloram at 1 g/plant killed all blackjack oak and winged elm sprouts 1 to 2 m tall. On a clay soil, 1 g of bromacil/plant killed 79% of the live oak and 88% of the winged elm plants, whereas picloram killed only 38 and 45%, respectively. Neither bromacil nor picloram was effective as soil treatments for killing honey mesquite.

Keywords

Acacia farnesianaIlex vomitoriaProsopis juliflora var.glandulosaRosa bracteataQuercus virginiana
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , July 1982 , pp. 378 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., Burnett, E., Meyer, R. E., Richardson, C., and Loh, A. 1978. Persistence of tebuthiuron in surface runoff water, soil, and vegetation in the Texas Blacklands Prairie. J. Environ. Qual. 7:233–236.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Flynt, T. O., Meyer, R. E., Baur, J. R., and Riley, T. E. 1976. Subsurface herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:338–341.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1978. Control of huisache with soil-applied herbicides. J. Range Manage. 31:179–182.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Davis, F. S., Merkle, M. G., and Morton, H. L. 1967. Control of woody and herbaceous vegetation with soil sterilants. Weeds 15:327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., and Baur, J. R. 1969. Control of live oak by herbicides applied at various rates and dates. Weed Sci. 17:373–376.Google Scholar
6. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Baur, J. R., Diaz-Colon, J. D., Dowler, C. C., and Lehman, S. K. 1969. Granular herbicides for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 17:538–541.Google Scholar
7. Bovey, R. W., Morton, H. L., Meyer, R. E., Flynt, T. O., and Riley, T. E. 1972. Control of yaupon and associated species. Weed Sci. 20:246–249.Google Scholar
8. Elwell, H. M. 1967. Winged elm control with picloram and 2,4, 5-T with and without additives. Weed Sci. 15:131–133.Google Scholar
9. Flynt, T. O., Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., and Baur, J. R. 1976. Granular herbicide applicator for brush control. J. Range Manage. 29:435–437.Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, G. O. 1970. Brush control with granular herbicides. Tex. Agric. Ext. Serv. Leaflet 898. 1 p.Google Scholar
11. Lehman, S. K. and Davis, F. S. 1966. Chemical control of yaupon (Ilex vomitoria Ait.). Proc. South. Weed Conf. 19:287–294.Google Scholar
12. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1979. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:280–284.Google Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Control of live oak (Quercus virginiana) and understory vegetation with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 28:51–58.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Control of whitebrush (Aloysia lycioides) and associated species with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 28:204–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Meyer, R. E. and Bovey, R. W. 1980. Hexazinone and other herbicides on Texas woody plants. Weed Sci. 28:358–362.Google Scholar
16. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., and Baur, J. R. 1978. Control of an oak (Quercus) complex with herbicide granules. Weed Sci. 26:444–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Meyer, R. E., Bovey, R. W., Riley, T. E., and Flynt, T. O. 1976. Seasonal response of Macartney rose and huisache to herbicides. J. Range Manage. 29:157–160.Google Scholar
18. Peevy, F. A. 1973. Bromacil and picloram under southern upland hardwoods. Weed Sci. 21:54–56.Google Scholar
19. Pettit, R. D. 1979. Effects of picloram and tebuthiuron pellets on sand shinnery oak communities. J. Range Manage. 32:196–200.Google Scholar
20. Scifres, C. J. 1972. Sand shinnery oak response to dicamba granules and picloram pellets. J. Range Manage. 25:155–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Scifres, C. J. 1975. Systems for improving Macartney rose infested coastal prairie rangeland. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 1225. 12 pp.Google Scholar
22. Scifres, C. J. 1975. Texas persimmon distribution and control with individual plant treatments. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1157. 11 pp.Google Scholar
23. Scifres, C. J. and Haas, R. H. 1974. Vegetation changes in a post oak savannah following woody plant control. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 1136. 12 pp.Google Scholar
24. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1978. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Meadors, C. H. 1978. Response of range vegetation to grid placement and aerial application of karbutilate. Weed Sci. 26:139–144.Google Scholar
26. Scifres, C. J., Stuth, J. W., and Bovey, R. W. 1981. Control of oaks and associated woody species on rangeland with tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 29:270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Shroyer, J. P., Stritzke, J. F., and Croy, L. I. 1979. Carbohydrate levels and control of blackjack oak and winged elm treated with tebuthiuron and 2, 4, 5-T. J. Range Manage. 32:60–62.Google Scholar
28. Smith, H. N. and Rechenthin, C. A. 1964. Grassland restoration. Part I. The Texas brush problem. U.S. Dep. Agric. Soil Conserv. Bull. 4-19114. 17 pp.Google Scholar
29. Stritzke, J. F. 1975. Chemical mixtures for control of winged elm. Weed Sci. 23:131–136.Google Scholar
30. Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Selective removal of brush by grid placement of herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:255.Google Scholar