Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:00:58.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Broadcast or Banded Atrazine plus Propachlor with Tillage Variables in Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. S. Moomaw  and
L. R. Robison
R. S. Moomaw
Affiliation:
Northeast Station at Concord, NB. 68728, Univ. of Nebraska
L. R. Robison
Affiliation:
Northeast Station at Concord, NB. 68728, Univ. of Nebraska
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The herbicide mixture 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) + 2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide (propachlor) was applied preemergence broadcast and in band widths of 18, 36, and 53-cm to corn (Zea mays L.). All herbicide treatments were applied as 1.1 kg of atrazine + 2.7 kg of propachlor per treated hectare. One row-middle cultivation and one rotary hoeing were also imposed on the herbicide treatments as variables. The 18-cm band of atrazine + propachlor with supplementary cultivation was as effective in controlling weed growth and maintaining corn yield as were wider herbicide bands or a broadcast treatment. Broadcast treated corn without row-middle cultivation produced significantly less grain than the handweeded check both years of the experiment. The average ratio of weed dry weight to reduction in corn yield was 0.8 to 1. Cultivation of row middles reduced average end-of-season weed yields 80%. Cultivator effectiveness on an 18-cm herbicide band equalled that measured on wider herbicide bands. Rotary hoeing reduced early season weed yields 82 and 38% in 1970 and 1971, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 106 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. 1970. Control of wild cane in corn. Weed Sci. 18:272–275.Google Scholar
2. Cates, J. S. and Cox, H. R. 1912. The weed factor in the cultivation of corn. U. S. Dep. Agr. Bull. 247. 35 p.Google Scholar
3. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1972. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Knake, Ellery L. and Slife, Fred W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
5. McGlamery, M. D. 1970. Mixing agricultural chemicals. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 25:91.Google Scholar
6. Meggitt, William F. 1960. The influence of cultivation on corn yields when weeds are controlled by herbicides. Proc. Northeast Weed Contr. Conf. 12:241–246.Google Scholar