Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:05:38.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biology of the Waterhyacinth Mite in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hugo A. Cordo  and
C. J. Deloach
Hugo A. Cordo
Affiliation:
Biol. Contr. of Weeds Res. Lab., U.S. Dep. Agr., Agr. Res. Ser., Hurlingham, Buenos Aires Prov., Argentina
C. J. Deloach
Affiliation:
Biol. Contr. of Weeds Res. Lab., U.S. Dep. Agr., Agr. Res. Ser., Hurlingham, Buenos Aires Prov., Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Populations of the waterhyacinth mite (Orthogalumna terebrantis Wallwork) of ca 200,000 galleries/m2 (or 10,000 per plant) caused serious damage to waterhyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms.] in the field, but such damage was sporadic and confined to small areas of plants in midsummer. Two or three generations a year occurred in the field. Adults emerged in late December, March, and May and adults were found on waterlettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) throughout the winter. Development, appearance of the different stages, behavior of immatures and adults, and manner of attacking waterhyacinth is described. Only small differences were found between the biology of the mites studied in Argentina and of that reported in Uruguay and the United States.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , May 1976 , pp. 245 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bennett, F.D. 1970. Insects attacking water hyacinth in the West Indies, British Honduras and the U.S.A. Hyacinth Contr. J. 8:10–13.Google Scholar
2. Bennett, F.D. 1974. Biological control. Pages 99–106 in Mitchell, D.S., ed., Aquatic vegetation and its use and control. Paris UNESCO.Google Scholar
3. Bennett, F.D. and Zwölfer, H. 1968. Exploration for natural enemies of the water hyacinth in northern South America and Trinidad. Hyacinth Contr. J. 7:44–52.Google Scholar
4. Cordo, H.A. and DeLoach, C.J. 1975. Ovipositional specificity and feeding habits of the waterhyacinth mite, Orthogalumna terebrantis, in Argentina. Environ. Entomol. 4:561–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Coulson, J.R. 1971. Prognosis for control of water hyacinth by arthropods. Hyacinth Contr. J. 9:31–34.Google Scholar
6. DeLoach, C.J. 1975. Evaluation of candidate arthropods for control of waterhyacinth: Studies in Argentina. Proc. Symp. on Water Quality Management through Biological Control, Gainesville, Fla., January 1975. Pages 44–50.Google Scholar
7. Perkins, B.D. 1974. Preliminary studies on a strain of the waterhyacinth mite from Argentina. Proc. 2nd Internat. Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Rome, Italy, October 4–7, 1971. 179–184 pp.Google Scholar
8. Wallwork, J.A. 1965. A leaf-boring galumnoid mite (Acari: Cryptostigmata) from Uruguay. Acarologia 7:758–764.Google Scholar