Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:59:32.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biology of common crupina and yellow starthistle, two Mediterranean winter annual invaders in western North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339

Abstract

This paper reviews the biology of two closely related Mediterranean annuals, yellow starthistle and common crupina, which have invaded grassland, shrub steppe, and open woodland habitats in western North America. Despite the similarity of their winter annual life cycle, the two species differ significantly in population dynamics. Common crupina has traits that favor persistence rather than rapid population growth: large, heavy achenes with an after-ripening requirement; lower fecundity but higher germination success; and reproduction regulated by vernalization and photoperiod in addition to thermal time. Persistence traits also foster invasion of undisturbed or less degraded steppe habitats. Yellow starthistle has more ruderal traits: small, light, rapidly germinating achenes; higher fecundity, with greater seedling mortality; and reproduction that is less sensitive to photoperiod and vernalization. These characteristics confer a greater adaptability for rapid spread and colonization of disturbance by yellow starthistle than by common crupina. An understanding of the relative differences in biological characters of each species and in their function in invaded environments is relevant to ecological management of these pest species.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, H. G. 1965. Characters and modes of origin of weeds. Pages 147172 In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L., eds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthell, J. F., Randall, J. M., Thorp, R. W., and Wenner, A. M. 1994. Invader-assisted invasion: pollination of yellow starthistle by feral honey bees in island and mainland ecosystems. Page 10 In Proceedings of the 79th Annual Ecological Society of America Meeting, Science and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1996. Recruitment in successional habitats: general trends and specific differences. Pages 82107 In Plants in Changing Environments. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beauverd, G. 1912. Plantes nouvelles ou critiques de la flore du bassin supérieur de Rhône. Bull. Soc. Bot. Gen. 9:388443.Google Scholar
Beerling, D. J. 1995. General aspects of plant invasions: an overview. Pages 237247 In Pyšek, P., Prach, K., Rejmánek, M., and Wade, M., eds. Plant Invasions—General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Belles, W. S., Wattenbarger, D. W., and Lee, G. A. 1981. Chemical control of Crupina vulgaris, a new range weed in Idaho and the United States. J. Range Manag. 34:468470.Google Scholar
Borman, M. M., Krueger, W. C., and Johnson, D. E. 1990. Growth patterns of perennial grasses in the annual grassland type of southwest Oregon. Agron. J. 82:10931098.Google Scholar
Borman, M. M., Krueger, W. C., and Johnson, D. E. 1991. Effects of established perennial grasses on yields of associated annual weeds. J. Range Manag. 44:318322.Google Scholar
Burgett, D. M., Stringer, B. A., and Johnston, L. D. 1989. Nectar and Pollen Plants of Oregon and the Pacific Northwest. Blodgett, OR: Honeystone Press.Google Scholar
Callihan, R. H., Prather, T. S., and Northam, F. E. 1993. Longevity of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) achenes in soil. Weed Technol. 7:3335.Google Scholar
Couderc-LeVaillant, M. 1984. L'amphiploïdie dans le genre Crupina DC. Essai de systématique synthétique. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Paris-ud, Orsay. 192 p.Google Scholar
Couderc-LeVaillant, M. and Roché, C. T. 1993. Evidence of multiple introductions of Crupina vulgaris in infestations in the western United States. Madroño 40:6365.Google Scholar
Dallman, P. R. 1998. Plant Life in the World's Mediterranean Climates: California, Chile, South Africa, Australia, and the Mediterranean Basin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. 1970. Steppe Vegetation of Washington. Pullman, WA: Washington Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 62. 131 p.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. and Sherman, R. J. 1991. Crupina vulgaris Cass. (Asteraceae: Cynareae) established in Sonoma County, California at Annadel State Park. Madrono 38:296.Google Scholar
Davis, P. H., ed. 1975. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume 5. Edinburgh, Scotland: University Press.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M., Kyser, G. B., and Hastings, M. S. 1999. Prescribed burning for control of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and enhanced native plant diversity. Weed Sci. 47:233242.Google Scholar
Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1970. Plant litter and establishment of alien annual species in rangeland communities. Weed Sci. 18:697703.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. D. 1997. How the West was lost: reconstructing the invasion dynamics of yellow starthistle and other plant invaders of western rangelands and natural areas. Proc. Calif. Exotic Pest Plant Council Symp. 3:6772.Google Scholar
Gunn, C. R. and Faul, K. 1979. Seeds of Drymaria arenarioides and D. pachyphylla (Caryophyllaceae) and achenes and capitula of Crupina vulgaris (Asteraceae). J. Seed Technol. 4:1823.Google Scholar
Harrod, R. J. and Taylor, R. J. 1995. Reproduction and pollination biology of Centaurea and Acroptilon species, with emphasis on C. diffusa . Northwest Sci. 69:97105.Google Scholar
Hendry, G. W. and Bellue, M. K. 1936. An approach to southwestern agricultural history through adobe brick analysis. Symposium on Prehistoric Agriculture. University of New Mexico Bulletin. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press. 8 p.Google Scholar
Hickman, J. C., ed. 1996. The Jepson Manual Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hironaka, M. 1990. Range ecology as the basis for vegetation management. Pages 1114 In Range Weeds Revisited, Proc. 1989 PNW Range Manage. Short Course. Spokane, WA: Coop. Ext. Bull. MISC0143, Washington State University.Google Scholar
Howell, J. T. 1959. Distributional data on weedy thistles in western North America. Leafl. West. Bot. 9:1732.Google Scholar
Joley, D. B. 1994. Yellow starthistle, Centaurea solstitialis L., seed germination study: effect of light, temperature, storage and seed type. Page 22 In Bezark, L. G., ed. Biological Control Program Annual Summary, 1993. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture.Google Scholar
Joley, D. B., Maddox, D. M., Mackey, B. E., Schoenig, S. E., and Casanave, K. A. 1997. Effect of light and temperature on germination of dimorphic achenes of Centaurea solstitialis in California. Can. J. Bot. 75:21312139.Google Scholar
Joley, D. B., Maddox, D. M., Supkoff, D. M., and Mayfield, A. 1992. Dynamics of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) achenes in field and laboratory. Weed Sci. 40:190194.Google Scholar
Kambitsch, D. L. 1983. The Longevity, Germination and Dissemination of Common Crupina (Crupina vulgaris Cass.) Achenes. . University of Idaho, Moscow. 54 p.Google Scholar
Larson, L. and Kiemnec, G. 1997. Differential germination by dimorphic achenes of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) under water stress. J. Arid Environ. 37:107114.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M. 1981. Introduction, phenology, and density of yellow starthistle in coastal, intercoastal, and central valley situations in California. Oakland, CA: USDA ARS ARR-W-20. 33 p.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M., Joley, D. B., Supkoff, D. M., and Mayfield, A. 1996. Pollination biology of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in California. Can. J. Bot. 74:262267.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M., Mayfield, A., and Poritz, N. H. 1985. Distribution of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Sci. 33:315327.Google Scholar
Miller, T. 1982. Biology and Control of Common Crupina (Crupina vulgaris Cass). . University of Idaho, Moscow. 54 p.Google Scholar
Miller, T. and Thill, D. 1983. Today's weed: common crupina. Weeds Today 14 (3): 1011.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. E. and Mortensen, D. A. 1985. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on common crupina (Crupina vulgaris). Weed Sci. 33:333339.Google Scholar
Pitcairn, M. J., Joley, D. B., and Woods, D. M. 1997. Impact of plant density on yellow starthistle seedhead production. Pages 5961 In Woods, D. M., ed. Biological Control Program Annual Summary, 1996. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry.Google Scholar
Pitcairn, M. J., Popescu, V., Joley, D. B., and Woods, D. M. 1998. Estimating the number of flowers per head from head diameter in yellow starthistle in California. Pages 6063 In Woods, D. M., ed. Biological Control Program Annual Summary, 1997. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services.Google Scholar
Prather, T. S., Callihan, R. H., and Thill, D. C. 1991. Common Crupina: Biology, Management and Eradication. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. Report CIS 880. 6 p.Google Scholar
Prodan, I. 1930. Centaureele Romaniei. Buletinul Academiei de Cluj Institulul de Arte Grafice. “Ardealul” Strada, Memorandului No. 22. 11 p.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P., Prach, K., and Šmilauer, P. 1995. Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. Pages 3960 In Pyšek, P., Prach, K., Rejmánek, M., and Wade, M., eds. Plant Invasions—General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Reed, C. F. 1977. Economically Important Foreign Weeds: Potential Problems in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Ag. Handbook No. 498. ARS APHIS. 629 p.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1976. Low temperature photosynthesis in successional winter annuals. Ecology 57:12971303.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F. Jr. 1965. Ecologic Studies of Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow. 78 p.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F., Jr. 1992. Achene dispersal in yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Northwest Sci. 66:6265.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F. Jr., Roché, C. T., and Chapman, R. C. 1994. Impacts of grassland habitat on yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.) invasion. Northwest Sci. 68:8696.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F. Jr. and Talbott, C. J. 1986. The collection history of Centaurea found in Washington state. Pullman, WA: Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University. Res. Bull. XB0978. 36 p.Google Scholar
Roché, C. J. T. 1996. Developmental Biology in Common Crupina (Crupina vulgaris Pers.) and Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow. 125 p.Google Scholar
Roché, C. T. and Roché, B. F. Jr. 1988. Distribution and amount of four knapweed (Centaurea L.) species in eastern Washington. Northwest Sci. 62:242253.Google Scholar
Roché, C. T., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1997a. Estimation of base and optimum temperatures for germination in common crupina (Crupina vulgaris). Weed Sci. 45:529533.Google Scholar
Roché, C. T., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1997b. Prediction of flowering in common crupina (Crupina vulgaris). Weed Sci. 45:519528.Google Scholar
Roché, C. T., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1997c. Reproductive phenology in yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Sci. 45:763770.Google Scholar
Schierenbeck, K. A. 1995. The threat to the California flora from invasive species; problems and possible solutions. Madroño 42:168174.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J. C. and Burrows, F. M. 1973. The dispersal effectiveness of the achene-pappus units of selected Compositae in steady winds with convection. New Phytol. 72:665675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Larson, L. L. 1994a. Observation: comparative live-history of cheatgrass and yellow starthistle. J. Range Manag. 47:450456.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Larson, L. L. 1994b. Comparative growth and interference between cheatgrass and yellow starthistle seedlings. J. Range Manag. 47:470474.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Larson, L. L., and Johnson, D. E. 1993. Germination and root dynamics of three range weeds and two forage species. Weed Technol. 7:234237.Google Scholar
Sobhian, R. 1993. Life history and host specificity of Urophora sirunaseva (Hering) (Dipt., Tephritidae), a candidate for biological control of yellow starthistle, with remarks on the host plant. J. Appl. Entomol. 116:381390.Google Scholar
Sobhian, R., Knutson, L., and Rodier, J. S. 1996. Biology and host specificity notes on Styphlus penicillus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), examined as a biological control agent for Crupina vulgaris in the United States with remarks on its host plant. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 98:317323.Google Scholar
Stickney, P. F. 1972. Crupina vulgaris (Compositae: Cynareae), new to Idaho and North America. Madroño 21:402.Google Scholar
Sun, M. 1997. Population genetic structure of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a colonizing weed in the western United States. Can. J. Bot. 75:14701478.Google Scholar
Sun, M. and Ritland, K. 1998. Mating system of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a successful colonizer in North America. Heredity 80:225232.Google Scholar
Talbott, C. J. 1987. Distribution and Ecologic Amplitude of Selected Centaurea Species in Eastern Washington. . Washington State University, Pullman. 186 p.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., Roché, C. T., and Zamora, D. L. 1999. Common crupina. Pages 189201 In Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., Zamora, D. L., and Kambitsch, D. L. 1985. Germination and viability of common crupina (Crupina vulgaris) achenes buried in the field. Weed Sci. 33:344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, D. C., Zamora, D. L., and Kambitsch, D. L. 1986. The germination and viability of excreted common crupina (Crupina vulgaris) achenes. Weed Sci. 34:237241.Google Scholar
Thomsen, C. D., Williams, W. A., Vayssières, M., Turner, C. E., and Lanini, W. T. 1996. Yellow Starthistle Biology and Control. Davis, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication 21541. 19 p.Google Scholar
van der Pijl, L. 1969. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Venette, R. C. and Carey, J. R. 1998. Invasion biology: rethinking our response to alien species. Calif. Agric. 52 (2): 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. S. and Schwarz, A. E. 1998. Where do we go from here? The challenges of risk assessment for invasive plants. Weed Sci. 12:744751.Google Scholar
Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1989. Seed production and germination dynamics in California annual grasslands. Pages 3945 In Huenneke, L. F. and Mooney, H., eds. Grassland Structure and Function: California Annual Grassland. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, D. L. 1988. The Reproductive Biology and Seed Longevity of Crupina vulgaris as it Pertains to an Eradication Strategy for Plant Invasions. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow. 88 p.Google Scholar
Zamora, D. L. and Thill, D. C. 1989. Seed bank longevity of common crupina (Crupina vulgaris) in natural populations. Weed Technol. 3:166169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohary, M. 1950. Evolutionary trends in the fruiting head of Compositae. Evolution 4:103109.Google Scholar