Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:28:18.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavior of sulfentrazone in the soil as influenced by cover crop before no-till soybean planting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Gabrielle de Castro Macedo Open the ORCID record for Gabrielle de Castro Macedo [Opens in a new window] ,
Caio Antonio Carbonari Open the ORCID record for Caio Antonio Carbonari [Opens in a new window] ,
Edivaldo Domingues Velini Open the ORCID record for Edivaldo Domingues Velini [Opens in a new window] ,
Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick Gomes Open the ORCID record for Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick Gomes [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Karollyna Alves de Matos Open the ORCID record for Ana Karollyna Alves de Matos [Opens in a new window] ,
Edicarlos Batista de Castro Open the ORCID record for Edicarlos Batista de Castro [Opens in a new window]  and
Nilda Roma Burgos Open the ORCID record for Nilda Roma Burgos [Opens in a new window]
Gabrielle de Castro Macedo*
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant Protection, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Caio Antonio Carbonari
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Breeding, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Edivaldo Domingues Velini
Affiliation:
Titular Professor, Department of Plant Production and Breeding, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick Gomes
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant Production and Breeding, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Ana Karollyna Alves de Matos
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant Production and Breeding, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Edicarlos Batista de Castro
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant Protection, Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Nilda Roma Burgos
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Gabrielle de Castro Macedo, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, West Central Research and Extension Center, 402 West State Farm Road, North Platte, NE, 69101. (E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

More than 80% of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in Brazil is cultivated in no-till systems, and although cover crops benefit the soil, they may reduce the amount of residual herbicides reaching the soil, thereby decreasing herbicide efficacy. The objective of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone applied alone, sequentially after glyphosate, and in a tank mixture with glyphosate before planting no-till soybean. Experiments were performed in two cover crop systems: (1) pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and (2) forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor]. The treatments tested were: glyphosate (720 g ae ha−1) at 20 d before sowing (DBS) followed by sulfentrazone (600 g ai ha−1) at 10 DBS; glyphosate + sulfentrazone (720 g ae ha−1 + 600 g ai ha−1) for cover crop desiccation at 10 DBS; and sulfentrazone alone at 10 DBS without a cover crop. The accumulation of straw was 31% greater using sorghum rather than pearl millet. In the sorghum system, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 0 to 10 cm was 57% less with sequential application and 92% less with the tank mixture compared with the treatment without cover crop straw at 1 d after application (DAA). The same occurred in the pearl millet system, where the reduction was 33% and 80% for the sequential application and tank mixture, respectively. The absence of a cover crop resulted in greater sulfentrazone concentrations in the top layer of the soil when compared with the sequential application or tank mixture. At 31 and 53 DAA, the concentration of sulfentrazone at 10 to 20 and 20 to 40 cm did not differ among treatments. Precipitation of 90 mm was enough to remove the herbicide from the cover crop straw at 31 DAA when using sequential application. An additional 90-mm precipitation was necessary to promote the same result when using the tank mixture.

Keywords

Dystrophic Red Nitosolglyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]leachingpearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown)sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ssp. bicolor]sorption
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 673 - 680
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Timothy L. Grey, University of Georgia

References

Ashigh, J, Hall, JC (2010) Bases for interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate in plants. J Agric Food Chem 58:7335–7343 Google ScholarPubMed
Banks, PA, Robinson, EL (1982) The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci 30:164–168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, PA, Robinson, EL (1986) Soil reception and activity of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor as affected by wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and irrigation. Weed Sci 34:607–611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonari, CA (2009) Effects of the Straw in the Amicarbazone Availability in Soil Solution in Cultivated Areas with Sugarcane. Ph.D dissertation. Botucatu, Sao Paulo: São Paulo State University. 101 pGoogle Scholar
Carbonari, CA, Gomes, GLGC, Trindade, MLB, Silva, JRM, Velini, ED (2016) Dynamics of sulfentrazone applied to sugarcane crop residues. Weed Sci 64:201–206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, NM, Camilo, EH, Santos, EA (2013) Sulfentrazone efficiency on Ipomoea hederifolia and Ipomoea quamoclit as influenced by rain and sugarcane straw. Planta Daninha 31:165–174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, GH, Duke, SO, ed (1985) Physiology of Weed Seed Dormancy and Germination. 1st ed. Volume 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Pp 27–64 Google Scholar
[EMBRAPA] Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2006) Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos—Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 306 p Google Scholar
[FEBRAPDP] Federação Brasileira de Plantio Direto na Cobertura morta (2013) Federação Brasileira de Plantio Direto e Irrigação. http://www.febrapdp.org.br. Accessed: June 10, 2015Google Scholar
FMC Corporation (1995) Technical Bulletin of Sulfentrazone. Philadelphia: FMC. 6 p Google Scholar
Forcella, F, Buhler, DD, McGiffen, ME (1994) Pest management and crop residues. Pages 173–189 in Hatfield, JL, Stewart, BA, eds. Crops Residue Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers Google Scholar
Ghadiri, H, Shea, PJ, Wicks, GA (1984) Interception and retention of atrazine by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble. Weed Sci 32:24–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, FG Jr, Christoffoleti, PJ (2008) Weed biology and management in no-tillage areas. Planta Daninha 26:789–798 Google Scholar
Grey, TL, Walker, RH, Hancock, HG (1997) Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci 45:733–738 Google Scholar
Hess, DF (1993) Herbicide effects on plant structure, physiology, and biochemistry. Pages 13–34 in Altman, J, ed. Pesticide Interactions in Crop Production. London: CRC Press Google Scholar
[EMATER] Instituto Paranaense de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (2014) Evolução do Sistema de Plantio Direto no Paraná. Curitiba, PR: Instituto Paranaense de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Jaremtchuck, CC, Constantin, J, Oliveira Júnior, RS, Biffe, DF, Alonso, DG, Arantes, JGZ (2008) Effect of burndown management on desiccation speed, initial weed emergence, development and yield of soybean. Acta Sci Agron 30:449–455 Google Scholar
Johnson, MD, Wyse, DL, Lueschen, WE (1989) The influence of herbicide formulation on wed control in four tillage systems. Weed Sci 37:239–249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, MA, Bryson, CT (1997) Herbicide-soil interaction in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci 45:307–320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, CO, Silva, CMMS, Fay, EF, Maia, AHN, Abakerli, RB, Durrant, LR (2008) Degradation of the herbicide sulfentrazone in a Brazilian Typic Hapludox soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40:879–886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, CO, Silva, CMMS, Fay, EF, Maia, AHN, Abakerli, RB, Durrant, LR (2010) Microbial degradation of sulfentrazone in a Brazilian Rhodic Hapludox soil. Braz J Microbiol 41:209–217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmes, GA, Hayes, RM, Mueller, TC (2000) Sulfentrazone dissipation in a Tennessee soil. Weed Technol 14:100–105 Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Locke, MA, Wagner, SC, Zablotowicz, RM, Gaston, LA, Smeda, RJ (1995) Chlorimuron ethyl sorption and desorption kinetics in soils and herbicide-desiccated cover crop residues. J Agric Food Chem 45:2752–2757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selim, HM, Zhou, L, Zhu, H (2003) Herbicide retention in soil as affected by sugarcane mulch residue. J Environ Qual 32:1445–1454 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaner, DL (2000) The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manage Sci 56:320–326 3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL (2012) Field dissipation of sulfentrazone and pendimethalin in Colorado. Weed Technol 26:633–637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press. 513 p Google Scholar
Strieder, ML, Pires, JLF, Constamilan, LM (2015) Rendimento de grãos de soja em diferentes espaçamentos entre linhas, na safra 2014/15. Passo Fundo, RS: Embrapa Trigo. Pp 19–24Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contributions of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J Prod Agric 9:475–479.Google Scholar
Tomlin, C, ed (1994) Pesticide Manual. 10th ed. Cambridge: British Crop Protection Council and the Royal Society of Chemistry. 1341 p Google Scholar
Velini, ED (1995) Estudos e desenvolvimento de métodos experimentais e amostrais adaptados à matologia. Ph.D dissertation. Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo: São Paulo State University. 250 pGoogle Scholar
Whalen, DM, Shergill, LS, Kinne, LP, Bish, MD, Bradley, KW (2020) Integration of residual herbicides with cover crop termination in soybean. Weed Technol 34:11–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar