Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:33:24.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atrazine dissipation and carryover from commercial and starch-encapsulated atrazine formulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gordon D. Vail ,
Michael V. Hickman  and
Marvin M. Schreiber
Gordon D. Vail
Affiliation:
Zeneca Ag Products, Findlay, OH 45840
Michael V. Hickman
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Washington, DC 20560
Marvin M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue-University, West Lafayette, IN 47970
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1991, 1992, and 1993 to evaluate the dissipation and carryover potential of atrazine from starch-encapsulated (SE) and commercial formulations (CF). Formulation was not a significant factor in atrazine dissipation at any application rate. The dissipation time required to reach one-half of the original concentration (DT50) was measured for each formulation. The atrazine DT50 combined over all years (1991 to 1993) and rates (1.1 to 3.4 kg ai ha−1) was 7 wk for the CF, 10.3 wk for the SE large particles (0.85 to 1.4 mm), and 8.2 wk for the SE small (0.425 to 0.85 mm). Oat injury in the spring of 1992 from all rates of both SE formulations applied in 1991 was greater than that from the CF formulation. Increased oat injury from SE formulations was attributed to more atrazine present in the top 0 to 8 cm of soil compared to that for the CF. Despite significant oat injury from the 1991 application, no injury was observed on soybeans planted in 1992. Soybeans planted in 1993 and 1994 also showed no injury from the respective applications. These findings suggest that the potential for atrazine carryover from starch-encapsulated formulations was not greater than that from the commercial formulation.

Keywords

Atrazineoat, Avena sativa L. ‘Ogle’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Resnik.’Crop rotationgranular herbicideparticle sizepercent encapsulationrainfallstarch encapsulation
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 842 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, H. P., Snee, R. D., and Sarner, M. H. 1980. Graphical display of means. Am. Stat. 34: 195–199.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. E., Chesters, G., and Harris, R. F. 1967. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31: 61–66.Google Scholar
Carr, M. E., Wing, R. E., and Doane, W. M. 1991. Encapsulation of atrazine within a starch matrix by extrusion processing. Gereal Chem. 68: 262–266.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Simmons, F. W., Wax, L. M., Wing, R. E., and Carr, M. E. 1992b. Atrazine movement in soil columns as influenced by starch-encapsulated and acrylic polymer additives. Weed Sci. 40: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Wax, L. M., and Simmons, F. W. 1992a. Leachability and efficacy of starch encapsulated atrazine. Weed Technol. 6: 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, K. P. and Green, R. E. 1971. Microbial degradation of the herbicide atrazine and its 2-hydroxy analog in submerged soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5: 426–429.Google Scholar
Hickman, M. V., Vail, G. D., Schreiber, M. M., and Grandt, J. 1991. Release of atrazine from starch encapsulated formulations in soil. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 46: 10.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. D. and Blake, J. 1970. Degradation of atrazine by soil fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2: 73–80.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C., Jarvis, L. J., Dowdy, R. H., Wyse, D. L., and Buhler, D. D. 1991. Automation of atrazine and alachlor extraction from soil using a laboratory robotic system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 561–562.Google Scholar
Mills, M. S. and Thurman, E. M. 1994. Reduction of nonpoint-source contamination of surface and groundwater by starch encapsulated atrazine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28: 73–79.Google Scholar
Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. I., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17: 202–205.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M., Hickman, M. V., and Vail, G. V. 1993. Starch-encapsulated pesticide: efficacy and transport. J. Environ. Qual. 22: 443–453.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M., Shasha, B. S., Trimnell, D., and White, M. D. 1987.Google Scholar
Controlled release herbicides. Pages 177–191 in McWorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. Weed Science Society of America Monogr. 4.Google Scholar
Shasha, B. S., Doane, W. M., and Russell, C. R. 1976. Starch encapsulated pesticides for slow release. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 14: 417–420.Google Scholar
Skipper, H. D., Gilmour, C. M., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Microbial versus chemical degradation of atrazine in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31: 653–656.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1964. Inactivation of simazine and atrazine in the field. Weeds 12: 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vail, G. D., Hickman, M. V., and Schreiber, M. M. 1995. Soil temperarure and water effects on dissipation of commercial and starch encapsulated atrazine formulations. Weed Sci. 41: 555–560.Google Scholar
Weinhold, B. J. and Gish, T. J. 1992. Effect of water potential, temperature, and soil microbial activity on release of starch-encapsulated atrazine and alachlor. J. Environ. Qual. 21: 382–386.Google Scholar
Weinhold, B. J. and Gish, T. J. 1991. Enzymatic pretreatment for extraction of starch encapsulated pesticides from soils. Weed Sci. 39: 423–426.Google Scholar
Weinhold, B. J., Sadeghi, A. M., and Gish, T. J. 1992. Effect of starch encapsulation and temperature on volatilization of atrazine and alachlor. J. Environ. Qual. 22: 162–166.Google Scholar