Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:49:51.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Herbicide-Susceptible Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) Population Made Even More Susceptible

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sudheesh Manalil
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia Kerala Agricultural University Trissur, Kerala, India, 680 656
Roberto Busi
Affiliation:
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia
Michael Renton
Affiliation:
School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Sitrling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia and Ecocsystem Sciences, CSIRO, Floreat, WA, Australia
Stephen B. Powles*
Affiliation:
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, School of Plant Biology, Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A wild population of a plant species, especially a cross-pollinated species, can display considerable genetic variation. Genetic variability is evident in differential susceptibility to an herbicide because the population can show continuous phenotypic variation. Recent, recurrent selection studies have revealed that phenotypic variation in response to low herbicide rates is heritable and can result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in genetically variable cross-pollinated rigid ryegrass. In this study, the heritable genetic variation in an herbicide-susceptible rigid ryegrass population was exploited to shift the population toward greater herbicide susceptibility by recurrent selection. To enhance herbicide susceptibility, herbicide-susceptible rigid ryegrass plants were divided into two identical clones, and one series of cloned plants was treated with a low rate of herbicide (diclofop). The nontreated clones of individuals that did not survive the herbicide treatment were selected and bulk-crossed to obtain the susceptible progeny. After two cycles of selection, the overall susceptibility to diclofop was doubled. The results indicate that minor genes for resistance are present in an herbicide-susceptible rigid ryegrass population, and their exclusion can increase susceptibility to diclofop.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bureau of Meteorology. 2011. Monthly Climate Statistics for Australian Locations. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data. Accessed: August 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Busi, R. and Powles, S. B. 2009. Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses. Heredity. 103:318325.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. T., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1994. Malathion antagonizes metabolism-based chlorsulfuron resistance in Lolium rigidum . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 49:172182.Google Scholar
Darmency, H. 1994. Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Pages 263295 in Powles, S. B., and Holtum, J. A. M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL Lewis.Google Scholar
Harper, J. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. London Academic. 892 p.Google Scholar
Hidayat, I. and Preston, C. 2001. Cross-resistance to imazethapyr in a fluazifop-P-butyl-resistant population of Digitaria sanguinalis . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 71:190195.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brûlé-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176193.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Streibig, J. C., and Ritz, C. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose–response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed. Technol. 21:840848.Google Scholar
Manalil, S., Busi, R., Renton, M., and Powles, S. B. 2011. Rapid evolution of herbicide resistance by low herbicide dosages. Weed Sci. 59:210217.Google Scholar
Moose, S. P., Dudley, J. W., and Rocheford, T. R. 2004. Maize selection passes the century mark: a unique resource for 21st century genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 9:358364.Google Scholar
Neve, P. 2007. Challenges for herbicide resistance evolution and management: 50 years after Harper. Weed Res. 47:365369.Google Scholar
Neve, P. and Powles, S. B. 2005a. High survival frequencies at low herbicide use rates in populations of Lolium rigidum result in rapid evolution of herbicide resistance. Heredity. 95:485492.Google Scholar
Neve, P. and Powles, S. B. 2005b. Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum . Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:11541166.Google Scholar
Oerke, E. C. 2006. Crop losses to pests. J. Agric. Sci. 144:3143.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. and Yu, Q. 2010. Evolution in action ∶ plants resistant to herbicides. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61:317347.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed: November 25, 2009.Google Scholar
Ritz, C. and Streibig, J. C. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R. J. Stat. Softw. 12:122.Google Scholar
Werck-Reichhart, D., Hehn, A., and Didierjean, L. 2000. Cytochromes P450 for engineering herbicide tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 5:116123.Google Scholar
Zelaya, I. A. and Owen, M. D. K. 2005. Differential response of Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq ex DC) JD Sauer to glyphosate. Pest. Manag. Sci. 61:936950.Google Scholar