Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:19:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Economic Threshold Model for Weeds in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michele C. Marra  and
Gerald A. Carlson
Michele C. Marra
Affiliation:
Dep. Econ. and Bus., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Gerald A. Carlson
Affiliation:
Dep. Econ. and Bus., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27650
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A model for determination of economic thresholds, or minimum weed population densities justifying the use of postemergence herbicide treatment, for five weed species in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is presented. Sensitivity analysis was performed on the model with respect to economic, statistical, and agronomic variables. The model was refined to include uncertainty about lost field days during the spraying period. Predictions from both the simple and refined models were consistent with economic theory. It was also determined that the economic threshold is sensitive to choice of data-collection ranges and functional form in weed-interference studies.

Keywords

Amaranthus hybridus L.Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth.Polygonum pensylvanicum L.Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.integrated pest managementweather riskAMBELPHBPUPOLPYXANOR
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 1983 , pp. 604 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J. R., Dillon, J. L., and Hardaker, J. B. 1977. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Iowa St. Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa. 344.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D. and Ritter, R. L. 1978. Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:556–559.Google Scholar
4. Gardner, B. 1976. Futures prices in supply analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 58:81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Headley, J. C. 1972. Defining the economic threshold. Pages 100–108 in Pest Control Strategy for the Future. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Moolani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126–128.Google Scholar
7. Nicholson, W. 1978. Pages 262 to 267 in Microeconomic Theory, The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, IL.Google Scholar
8. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-Foxtail competition under varying moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.Google Scholar
9. Theil, H. 1971. Principles of Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 735.Google Scholar
10. Thompson, W. R. Jr. 1981. Ten steps to higher soybeans and profits. Sp. Suppl. to Progr. Farm. 96(1): 15–16.Google Scholar
11. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar