Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:24:00.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aminopyralid and Clopyralid Absorption and Translocation in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bekir Bukun ,
Todd A. Gaines ,
Scott J. Nissen ,
Philip Westra ,
Galen Brunk ,
Dale L. Shaner ,
Byron B. Sleugh  and
Vanelle F. Peterson
Bekir Bukun
Affiliation:
Plant Protection Department, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
Todd A. Gaines
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Scott J. Nissen*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Galen Brunk
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Dale L. Shaner
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Water Management Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO 80526
Byron B. Sleugh
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Vanelle F. Peterson
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aminopyralid is a new auxinic herbicide that provides Canada thistle control at lower use rates than clopyralid. Studies were conducted to determine if differences in absorption, translocation, or metabolism account for aminopyralid's greater biological activity. Radiolabeled aminopyralid and clopyralid were applied to individual leaves of rosette-stage Canada thistle plants. Nonionic surfactant was used for the absorption studies because it provided higher aminopyralid absorption than methylated seed oil or crop oil concentrate. Clopyralid was absorbed very rapidly, reaching 72% 24 h after treatment (HAT) and remaining near or above 80% during a 192-h time course. During the same time period, aminopyralid absorption increased from 34 to 60%. Clopyralid translocation out of the treated leaf was significantly higher than aminopyralid, 39% compared with 17%, respectively, 192 HAT. More of applied clopyralid translocated to aboveground tissue 192 HAT (27%) than to roots (12%), whereas aminopyralid translocation was similar in aboveground tissue (10%) and roots (7%) 192 HAT. Neither aminopyralid nor clopyralid was metabolized 192 HAT. Although aminopyralid is effective at lower use rates than clopyralid, clopyralid absorption and translocation were higher in Canada thistle. These results suggest that aminopyralid's chemical structure may provide for greater biological activity at the target site than clopyralid.

Keywords

AminopyralidclopyralidCanada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. CIRARAuxinic herbicidesmetabolismherbicide physiology
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 10 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beck, K. G. and Sebastian, J. R. 2000. Combining mowing and fall-applied herbicides to control Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol. 14:351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrithers, V. F., Burch, P. L., Kline, W. N., Masters, R. A., Nelson, J. A., Halstvedt, M. B., Troth, J. L., and Breuninger, J. M. 2005. Aminopyralid: a new reduced risk active ingredient for control of broadleaf invasive and noxious weeds. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 58:59–60.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Vandenborn, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1988. Clopyralid effects on shoot emergence, root biomass, and secondary shoot regrowth potential of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 36:804–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1994. The biology of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:77–101.Google Scholar
Enloe, S. F., Lym, R. G., Wilson, R., et al. 2007. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control with aminopyralid in range, pasture, and noncrop areas. Weed Technol. 21:890–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Jourdan, S. W., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Magnusson, M. U. 1993. Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and maize (Zea mays) cell-suspension cultures. Weed Sci. 41:325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. C., Bestman, H. D., Devine, M. D., and Vandenborn, W. H. 1985. Contribution of soil spray deposit from postemergence herbicide applications to control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:836–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, K. B. and Riechers, D. E. 2007. Recent developments in auxin biology and new opportunities for auxinic herbicide research. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 89:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. C. 1993. Use and mode of action of adjuvants for herbicides—a review of some current work. Pestic. Sci. 38:93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleier, D. A. 1988. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics. 1. Mathematical model unifying the weak acid and intermediate permeability theories. Plant Physiol. 86:803–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, L. B. and Vandenborn, W. H. 1989. The root system of Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, S. J., Masters, R. A., Thompson, W. M., and Stougaard, R. N. 1995. Absorption and fate of imazapyr in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Pestic. Sci. 45:325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Absorption and translocation of 14C 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 24:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orfanedes, M. S., Wax, L. M., and Liebl, R. A. 1993. Absence of a role for absorption, translocation, and metabolism in differential sensitivity of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to 2 pyridine herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc 2004. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary, NC SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. S. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P., Chang, F. Y., and Vandenborn, W. H. 1971. Penetration and translocation of picloram in Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 19:349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, G. C. and Stephenson, G. R. 1985. Translocation of clopyralid and 2,4-D in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela-Valenzuela, J. M., Lownds, N. K., and Sterling, T. M. 2001. Clopyralid uptake, translocation, metabolism, and ethylene induction in picloram-resistant yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 71:11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar