Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:42:28.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption and Desorption of Picloram, Trifluralin, and Paraquat by Ionic and Nonionic Exchange Resins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. G. McCall ,
R. W. Bovey ,
M. G. McCully  and
M. G. Merkle
H. G. McCall
Affiliation:
Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ.
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agr.
M. G. McCully
Affiliation:
Dep. of Range Sci. and Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Texas 77843
M. G. Merkle
Affiliation:
Dep. of Range Sci. and Soil and Crop Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Texas 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the forces involved in the adsorption and desorption of 4-amino-3,5-6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), 1,1-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion (paraquat), and α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) using cationic, anionic, and nonionic exchange resins. The anionic resin (Cl-form) adsorbed 375, 0.08, and 0.67 mg of picloram, paraquat, and trifluralin, respectively, per gram of oven-dry resin. The nonionic resin adsorbed 4.0, 0.34, and 10.0 mg of picloram, paraquat, and trifluralin, respectively, per gram of oven-dry resin, while the cationic resin (H-form) adsorbed 2.3, 226, and 0.17 mg of picloram, paraquat, and trifluralin, respectively. Other cationic resins (Na-form and Ca-form) performed similarly to the hydrogen form. Desorption studies indicated that picloram was adsorbed mainly in the anionic form by coulombic forces (electrostatic) and to a lesser degree by weak physical bonding (van der Waal's forces). Paraquat was adsorbed as a cation through coulombic forces. Trifluralin was mainly absorbed by physical bonds at sites on the resins where there were no coulombic forces.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 1972 , pp. 250 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P., Richards, A. B., and Whitworth, J. W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Broadbent, F. E. and Bradford, G. R. 1962. Cation exchange groupings in the soil organic fraction. Soil Sci. 74:447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Coffey, D. L. and Warren, G. F. 1969. Inactivation of herbicides by activated carbon and other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 17:16–19.Google Scholar
4. Dubach, P. and Mehta, N. C. 1963. The chemistry of soil humic substances. Soil and Fertilizers 26:293–300.Google Scholar
5. Elwell, W. T. and Gidley, J. A. F. 1966. Atomic adsorption spectrophotometry. Vol. 6, 2nd (Rev.) ed. Pergamon Press, New York. 140 p.Google Scholar
6. Grover, R. 1968. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicity of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram). Weed Res. 8:226–232.Google Scholar
7. Hamaker, J. W., Goring, C. A. J., and Youngson, C. R. 1966. Sorption and leaching of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid in soils. Advan. Chem. Ser. 60:23–27.Google Scholar
8. Herr, D. E., Stroube, E. W., and Ray, Dale A. 1965. The movement and persistence of picloram in soil. Weeds 14: 248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Keys, C. H. and Friesen, H. A. 1968. Persistence of picloram activity in soil. Weed Sci. 16:341–343.Google Scholar
10. Kipling, I. J. 1965. Adsorption from solutions of nonelectrolytes. Academic Press, New York. 328 p.Google Scholar
11. Kononova, M. M. 1966. Soil organic matter. 2nd Ed. Pergamon Press, Inc., New York. 450 p.Google Scholar
12. Merkle, M. G., Bovey, R. W., and Hall, R. 1966. The determination of picloram residues in soil using gas chromatography. Weeds 14:161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Mortensen, J. L. and Himes, F. L. 1965. Soil organic matter, p. 206–241. In Baer, F. E. (ed.), Chemistry of the soil, Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York.Google Scholar
14. Obien, S. P., Suehisa, P. H., and Younge, O. R. 1966. The effects of soil factors on the phytotoxicity of neburon to oats. Weeds 14:105–109.Google Scholar
15. Parka, S. J. and Tepe, J. B. 1969. The disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.Google Scholar
17. Shadied, S. and Andrews, H. 1966. Leaching of trifluralin, linuron, prometryne, and cotoran in soil columns. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 19:522–534.Google Scholar
18. Sheets, T. J., Crafts, A. S., and Drever, H. R. 1962. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicities of the s-triazine herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:458–462.Google Scholar
19. Sheets, T. J. 1958. The comparative toxicities of four phenylurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413–424.Google Scholar
20. Tepe, J. B. and Scroggs, R. E. 1967. Trifluralin. p. 527–535. In Zweig, G. (ed.) Analytical methods for pesticides, plant growth regulators and food additives. Vol. V. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
21. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.Google Scholar
22. Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L., Mason, D. D., and Kamprath, E. J. 1966. The correlation of herbicidal activity with soil and climatic factors. Weeds 14:42–48.Google Scholar
23. Visser, S. A. 1964. A physico-chemical study of the properties of humic acids and their changes during humification. J. Soil Sci. 15:202–219.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J. B., Ward, T. M., and Weed, S. B. 1968. Adsorption and desorption of diquat, paraquat, prometone, and 2,4-D by charcoal and exchange resins. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 32:197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Weber, J. B. and Weed, S. B. 1968. Adsorption and desorption of diquat, paraquat and prometone by montmorillonitic and kaolinitic clay minerals. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 32:485–487.Google Scholar
26. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D, and prometone by clays, charcoal, and an anion-exchange resin. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 29:678–688.Google Scholar
27. Yuen, S. H., Bagness, J. E., and Myles, D. 1967. Spectrophotometric determination of diquat and paraquat in aqueous herbicide formulations. Analyst 92:375–381.Google Scholar
28. Weed Society of America. 1970. Herbicide handbook. W. F. Humphrey Press Inc., Geneva, New York. 368 p.Google Scholar