Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:47:51.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption, Translocation, and Phytotoxicity of Chlorimuron and 2,4-Db Mixtures in Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) and Selected Weed Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Glenn R. Wehtje ,
John W. Wilcut  and
John A. Mcguire
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Box 748, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Univ. Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
John A. Mcguire
Affiliation:
Res. Data Analysis and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. J. Ser. No. 3-913221
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mixtures of chlorimuron and 2,4-DB were additive with respect to crop injury and were either additive or slightly antagonistic with respect to weed control in greenhouse experiments. Absorption and translocation of 14C following application of 14C-chlorimuron and 14C-2,4-DB were not affected by the presence of the other unlabeled herbicide, except in Florida beggarweed and peanut where 2,4-DB affected distribution of 14C-chlorimuron in the treated leaf. In field studies, maximum efficacy was obtained with mixtures of chlorimuron plus 2,4-DB applied 7 or 9 wk after planting. Florida beggarweed control was greatest with chlorimuron or chlorimuron mixtures while the addition of 2,4-DB to chlorimuron improved morningglory and sicklepod control. At 9 and 11 wk after planting, addition of 2,4-DB to chlorimuron controlled Florida beggarweed better than chlorimuron alone. Peanut yields were increased by the addition of 2,4-DB at later applications.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray #3 IPOHGFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (SW.) DC # DEDTOpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBtall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth. # PHBPUpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. # ARHHYAntagonismsynergismtranslocationARAHYCASOBDEDTO
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 347 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. Pages 117–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides. Vol. 3. Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action; Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Brown, H. M. and Neighbors, S. M. 1987. Soybean metabolism of chlorimuron ethyl:physiological basis for soybean selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 29:112–120.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. Pages 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
4. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
5. Colvin, D. L. and Brecke, B. J. 1988. Peanut yield and weed control as affected by timing and application rate of chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:60.Google Scholar
6. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed Survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–420.Google Scholar
7. Hawf, L. R. and Behrens, R. 1974. Selectivity factors in response of plants to 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22:245–249.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, W. C. III, Mullinix, B. G. Jr., and Brown, S. M. 1992. Phytotoxicity of chlorimuron and tank mixtures on peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 6:404–408.Google Scholar
9. Ketchersid, M. L., Boswell, T. E., and Merkle, M. G. 1978. Effects of 2,4-DB on yield and pod development in peanuts. Peanut Sci. 5:35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:317–321.Google Scholar
11. Ray, T. B. 1986. Sulfonylurea herbicides as inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Biol. Sci. 11:180–183.Google Scholar
12. Sims, G. R., Wehtje, G., McGuire, J. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1987. Weed control and response of peanuts to chlorimuron. Peanut Sci. 14:42–45.Google Scholar
13. Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 5 ed. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. 959 pp.Google Scholar
14. Wathana, S., Corbin, F. T., and Waldrep, T. W. 1972. Absorption and translocation of 2,4-DB in soybeans and cocklebur. Weed Sci. 20:120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenylether with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345–351.Google Scholar
16. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Effect of acifluorfen on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron in certain weeds. Weed Technol. 6:4–12.Google Scholar
17. Westberg, D. E. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Effect of acifluorfen on the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of chlorimuron on certain weeds. Weed Technol. 6:4–12.Google Scholar
18. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans, peanuts, and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Bentazon and naptalam tank-mixtures with chlorimuron for weed control in peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 23:54.Google Scholar
20. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut. Rev. Weed Sci. 6:177–206.Google Scholar