Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:11:39.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of AC 263,222 in Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea), Soybean (Glycine Max), and Selected Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry J. Newsom
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Thomas F. Hubbard Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

The 14C-AC 263,222 was foliar applied to common cocklebur, johnsongrass, peanut, sicklepod, and soybean in order to study translocation and metabolism characteristics in each species. Differential absorption of 14C-AC 263,222 between species was evident 4 h after application. At 48 h after application, sicklepod and peanut absorbed more 14C-AC 263,222 than johnsongrass, common cocklebur, or soybean. Translocation of 14C-AC 263,222 and its metabolites out of the treated leaves increased with time for all species. The 14C-AC 263,222 and its metabolites appear to be both xylem- and phloem-mobile based on patterns of movement. Absorption and translocation differences occurred between species; however, they did not appear to explain differential species response. Metabolism of 14C-AC 263,222 differed greatly among species. Common cocklebur metabolized less 14C-AC 263,222 than any other species 96 h after application. Johnsongrass and sicklepod metabolized 24 and 28% of the 14C-AC 263,222, respectively, 96 h after application. Peanut and soybean metabolized 76 and 62%, respectively, of the 14C-AC 263,222 96 h after treatment. The half-life of 14C-AC 263,222 was 1.1, 2.5, 7.7, 11.6, and 34.5 d in peanut, soybean, sicklepod, johnsongrass, and common cocklebur, respectively. Differential tolerance of species appears to be directly related to the half-life of AC 263,222 in the plant.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, P. C. and Hibberd, K. A. 1985. Evidence for the interaction of an imidazolinone herbicide with leucine, valine, and isoleucine metabolism. Weed Sci. 33:479483.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L., Edwards, C. J. Jr., and Hartwig, E. E. 1976. Screening soybeans for tolerance to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:351353.Google Scholar
3. Boote, K. J. 1982. Growth stages of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Sci. 9:3540.Google Scholar
4. Cole, T. A., Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Behavior of imazethapyr in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:639644.Google Scholar
5. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392407.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. D. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Sci. 11:2526.Google Scholar
7. Lee, A., Gatterdam, P. E., Chiu, T. Y., Mallipudi, N. M., and Fiala, R. R. 1991. Chapter 11: Plant metabolism. Pages 151166 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boston.Google Scholar
8. Little, D. L. and Shaner, D. L. 1991. Chapter 5: Absorption and translocation of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 5369 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boston.Google Scholar
9. Miller, D. K. and Griffin, J. L. 1992. Soybean varietal response to cadre application and moisture regime. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:69.Google Scholar
10. Shaner, D. L. and Mallipudi, N. M. 1991. Chapter 7: Mechanisms of selectivity of the imidazolinones. Pages 91102 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boston.Google Scholar
11. Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252 214 in soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wesley, M. T. 1991. Interactions of ALS-inhibiting and diphenylether herbicides on various weed species. M. S. Thesis. Mississippi State Univ. Mississippi State, MS 45 pp.Google Scholar
13. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1992. Rate and application studies with AC 263,222 in peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:110.Google Scholar
14. Wilcut, W. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., and Cole, T. A. 1988. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied imazaquin in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and associated weeds. Weed Sci. 36:58.Google Scholar
15. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:817822.Google Scholar
16. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Postemergence combinations of imazaquin or imazethapyr with AC 263,222 for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:644649.Google Scholar
17. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:434438.Google Scholar