Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:51:41.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of 14C-Buthidazole in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Quackgrass (Agropyon repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kriton K. Hatzios
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Pesticide Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Pesticide Res. Center, Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

The patterns of buthidazole {3-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2 imidazolidinone} uptake, translocation, and metabolism, and their potential contribution to crop selectivity, were studied in tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. ‘Vernal’) and susceptible quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]. 14C-Buthidazole was absorbed from a 5-μl droplet by leaves of both alfalfa and quackgrass plants, but did not move basipetally to the roots or nontreated leaves in 14 days. 14C-Buthidazole was absorbed very rapidly from Hoagland's solution by the roots of both species and translocated apoplastically to the leaves. Absorption and translocation of buthidazole did not differ between species, indicating that these processes did not contribute to crop selectivity. The herbicide and five metabolites were present in alfalfa leaf extracts 6 days after treatment. One unidentified metabolite accounted for 40% of the detected radioactivity 6 days after root application. Unmetabolized 14C-buthidazole accounted for 87% of the total radioactivity in quackgrass after 6 days. Metabolites having different chromatographic properties were recovered from the two species. Differential rate and type of metabolism appeared to contribute to buthidazole selectivity between the species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1976. Ravage™ herbicide for experimental use as an industrial and non-cropland herbicide. Tech. Inf. Bull., Velsicol Chemical Co., Chicago, Ill. 6 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1977. Experimental herbicide VEL-5026 for agricultural use. Tech. Inf. Bull., Velsicol Chemical Corporation. Chicago, Ill. 5 pp.Google Scholar
3. Ashton, F. M. and Harvey, W. A. 1971. Selective chemical weed control. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Cir. 558. 17 pp.Google Scholar
4. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1979. Mode of action of buthidazole. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 19:104105.Google Scholar
5. Hay, J. R. 1976. Herbicide transport in plants. Pages 365396 in Andus, L. J. ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
6. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1960. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
7. Naylor, A. W. 1976. Herbicide metabolism in plants. Pages 397426 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
8. Wain, R. L. and Smith, M. S. 1976. Selectivity in relation to metabolism. Pages 279302 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
9. Weed Science Society of America. 1979. Herbicide Handbook, 4th Edition. 479 pp.Google Scholar