Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:09:14.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) and Avena sterilis Morphological Characteristics and Response to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carol N. Somody ,
John D. Nalewaja  and
Stephen D. Miller
Carol N. Somody
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105 CIBA-GEIGY, Greensboro, NC
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wild oat (Avena fatua L. ♯3 AVEFA) and Avena sterilis L. ♯ AVEST accessions from the United States were screened for tolerance to diallate [S-(2,3-dichloroallyl) diisopropylthiocarbamate], triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl) diisopropylthiocarbamate], barban (4-chloro-2-butynyl m-chlorocarbanilate), diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] propanoic acid}, difenzoquat (1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazolium), flamprop [N-benzoyl-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-DL-alanine], and MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate). Some accessions were tolerant to more than one herbicide but none were tolerant to all herbicides. Tolerance to a herbicide was not restricted to certain areas of origin of the accessions, and tolerant accessions occurred even in locations that had not been treated previously with the herbicide. In general, accessions from Southern California and Arizona were shorter, produced more tillers, and required the least number of days to panicle emergence. However, accessions from within individual areas were nearly as variable in these characteristics as the entire 1200 accessions. Tolerance of accessions to flamprop, difenzoquat, MSMA, and diclofop was not due to low leaf surface area, since the tolerant accessions usually had the most leaf surface area. All the accessions tolerant to difenzoquat, MSMA, and flamprop, and three of the four accessions tolerant to diclofop, tillered less than the susceptible accessions.

Keywords

TolerancediallatetriallatebarbandiclofopdifenzoquatflampropMSMAAVEFAAVEST
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 353 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abel, A. L. 1954. The rotation of weed killers. Proc. Br. Weed Contr. Conf. 2:249–255.Google Scholar
2. Bell, A. R., Nalewaja, J. D., and Schooler, A. B. 1972. Response of kochia accessions to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 20:458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bell, A. R., Nalewaja, J. D., and Schooler, A. B. 1973. Response of perennial sowthistle accessions to herbicides. Crop Sci. 13:191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 18:253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Imam, A. G. and Allard, R. W. 1965. Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species. VI. Genetic variability between and within natural populations of wild oat in differing habitats in California. Genetics. 51:49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Jacobsohn, R. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. Differential response of wild oat lines to diallate, triallate and barban. Weed Sci. 16:491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Control of johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 19:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Comparative morphological development of six Johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 24:270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C.E.G. 1982. Evaluation of morphological and physiological variation in wild oat. Agron. J. 74:771–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ryan, G. F. 1970. Resistance of common groundsel to simazine and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:614–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Rydrych, D. J. and Seely, C. I. 1964. Effect of IPC on accessions of wild oat. Weeds 12:265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Schoner, C. A., Norris, R. F., and Chilcote, W. 1978. Yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens) biotype studies: Growth and morphological characteristics. Weed Sci. 26:632–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Stanton, T. R. 1961. Classification of Avena . Pages 75–95 in Coffman, F. A., ed. Oats and Oat Improvement. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar