Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:10:00.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild oat and climate change: The effect of CO2 concentration, temperature, and water deficit on the growth and development of wild oat in monoculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chris C. O'Donnell  and
Steve W. Adkins
Steve W. Adkins
Affiliation:
School of Land and Food and The Co-operative Research Centre for Tropical Pest Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed from six Australian near-isogenic lines of wild oat were germinated and grown in controlled-environment growth chambers under either ambient CO2 (357 parts per million by volume [ppmv]) or elevated CO2 (480 ppmv) at 20/16 C or 23/19 C. Three soil moisture treatments—−0.01 MPa (field capacity), −0.10 MPa, or −1.00 MPa—were imposed. Wild oat lines grown under elevated CO2 had higher seed production and greater plant dry weights, although the response of these variates involved a complex of interactions with temperature, soil moisture, and line. Plant height varied with wild oat line, and plants grown at 20/16 C were taller than those grown at 23/19 C. At 23/19 C, time taken to mature was reduced for some wild oat lines, and elevated CO2 reduced the time taken to maturity for some lines at 20/16 C. There was no significant difference in the level of dormancy developed in freshly harvested caryopses between the two CO2 treatments, but an effect was present in seed that had been after-ripened for 193 d. These results indicate that the main climate change variables ([CO2], soil moisture, and increased temperature) directly influence the growth and development of wild oat and are likely to affect the population dynamics of this species.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua AVEFAAnnual weedsgreenhouse effect
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 694 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adkins, S. W., Loewen, M., and Symons, S. J. 1986. Variation within pure lines of wild oats (Avena fatua) in relation to degree of primary dormancy. Weed Sci. 34:859–864.Google Scholar
Adkins, S. W., Loewen, M., and Symons, S. J. 1987. Variation within pure lines of wild oats (Avena fatua) in relation to temperature of development. Weed Sci. 35:169–72.Google Scholar
Adkins, S. W. and Simpson, G. M. 1988. The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua . IX. Characterization of two dormancy states. Physiol. Plant. 73:15–20.Google Scholar
Armstrong, L. J. 1994. Studies on the Biology of Wild Oats (Avena fatua L.): The Effect of Selected Environmental Factors on Growth and Reproduction. . The University of Queensland, Australia. 241 p.Google Scholar
Banting, J. D. 1962. The dormancy behaviour of Avena fatua L. in cultivated soil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:22–39.Google Scholar
Banting, J. D. 1966. Factors affecting the persistence of Avena fatua . Can. J. Plant Sci. 46:469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzaz, F. A. 1990. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:167–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. 1959. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua . I. The possible role of germination inhibitors. Can. J. Bot. 37:393–402.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1953. Experimental Designs. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 218–240.Google Scholar
Conroy, J. and Hocking, P. 1993. Nitrogen nutrition of C3 plants at elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Physiol. Plant. 89:570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, T. J., Tans, P. P., Waterman, L. S., Thoning, K. W., Kitzis, D. R., Masarie, K. A., and Zhang, N. 1994. Evidence for interannual variability of the carbon cycle from the NOAA/CMDL global air sampling network. J. Geophys. Res. 99:22, 831-822, 855.Google Scholar
CSIRO. 2001. Climate change projections for the Australian region. Melbourne, Australia: Climate Impact Group, CSIRO Atmospheric Research. 8 p.Google Scholar
Cure, J. D. and Acock, B. 1986. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38:127–145.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. and Aguilar, I. M. 1976. Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat variety and the effects of carbon dioxide fertilization. Agron. J. 68:749–752.Google Scholar
Ghannoum, O., von Caemmerer, S., Barlow, E.W.R., and Conroy, J. 1997. The effect of CO2 enrichment and irradiance on the growth, morphology and gas exchange of a C3 (Panicum laxum) and a C4 (Panicum antidotale) grass. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:227–237.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. M. 1977. Growth pattern, carbon dioxide exchange and dry weight distribution in wheat growing under differing photosynthetic environments. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 4:99–110.Google Scholar
Gifford, R. 1988. Direct effects of higher carbon dioxide concentrations on vegetation. Pages 506–519 In Pearman, G. I., ed. Greenhouse—Planning for Climate Change. Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Hesketh, J. D. and Hellmers, H. 1973. Floral initiation in four plant species growing in CO2 enriched air. Environ. Control Biol. 11:51–53.Google Scholar
Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J., eds. 1990. Climate change—the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 365 p.Google Scholar
Hsiao, A. I., McIntyre, G. I., and Hanes, J. A. 1983. Seed dormancy in Avena fatua . I. Induction of germination by mechanical injury. Bot. Gaz. 144:217–222.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. and Lloyd, P. S. 1987. Growth and partitioning. New Phytol. 106:235–249.Google Scholar
Idso, S. B., Kimball, B. A., Anderson, M. G., and Mauney, J. R. 1987. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth: the interactive role of air temperature. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 20:1–10.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Coleman, D. F., and Yanagisawa, T. 1985. Increase in atmospheric partial pressure of carbon dioxide and growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 54:413–418.Google Scholar
Jana, S., Acharya, S. N., and Naylor, J. M. 1979. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua . 10. On the inheritance of germination behaviour. Can. J. Bot. 57:1663–1667.Google Scholar
Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B., Carter, A. F., Piper, S. C., Whorf, T. P., Heimann, M., Mook, W. G., and Roeloffzen, H. 1989. A three-dimensional model of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds: 1. Analysis of observational data. Pages 305–363 In Peterson, D. H., ed. Geophysical Monograph 55. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron. J. 75:779–788.Google Scholar
Klute, A. 1986. Water retention laboratory methods. Pages 635–662 In Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1—Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy, No. 9 Part 1. 2nd ed. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Knight, R. 1979. Hybridization and the breeding of self pollinated crops. Pages 23–25 In Halloran, G. M. and Knight, R., eds. Plant Breeding. Brisbane, Austalia: Vice Chancellors Committee.Google Scholar
Krenzer, E. G. Jr., and Moss, D. N. 1975. Carbon dioxide enrichment effects upon yield and yield components in wheat. Crop Sci. 15:71–74.Google Scholar
Leuning, R., Wang, Y. P., de Pury, D., Denmead, O. T., Dunin, F. X., Condon, A. G., Nonhebel, S., and Goudriaan, J. 1993. Growth and water use of wheat under present and future levels of CO2 . Agric. Meteorol. 48:807–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marc, J. and Gifford, R. M. 1983. Floral initiation in wheat, sunflower, and sorghum under carbon dioxide enrichment. Can. J. Bot. 62:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. P. and Field, R. J. 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28:111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C.E.G. 1982. Morphological and physiological variation in wild oat. Agron. J. 74:771–775.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. I. and Gifford, R. M. 1984. Plant growth and water use with limited supply in high CO2 concentrations. I. Leaf area, water use and transpiration. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11:361–374.Google Scholar
Naylor, J. M. 1983. Studies on the genetic control of some physiological processes in seeds. Can. J. Bot. 61:3561–3567.Google Scholar
Neftel, A., Moor, E., Oeschger, H., and Stauffer, B. 1985. Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries. Nature 315:45–47.Google Scholar
Norby, R. J., O'Neill, E. G., and Luxmore, R. J. 1986. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and mineral nutrition of Quercus alba seedlings in nutrient-poor soil. Plant Physiol. 82:83–89.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1995. Weeds in a changing climate. Weed Sci. 43:685–701.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1980. Potential effects of global atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 weed and crop plants. Weed Sci. 28:71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearman, G. I., Etheridge, D., de Silva, F., and Fraser, P. J. 1986. Evidence of changing concentrations of atmospheric CO2, N2O and CH4 from air bubbles in Antarctic ice. Nature 320:248–250.Google Scholar
Rawson, H. M. 1992. Plant responses to temperature under conditions of elevated CO2. Aust. J. Bot. 40:473–490.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H., Runion, G. B., and Krupa, S. V. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut. 83:155–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua . 13. Influence of drought stress during seed development on duration of seed dormancy. Can. J. Bot. 60:1016–1020.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, M., Johnson, R. C., and Ferris, D. M. 1989. Development of winter wheat under increased atmospheric CO2 and water limitation at tillering. Crop Sci. 29:1083–1086.Google Scholar
Sexsmith, J. J. 1969. Dormancy of wild oat seed produced under various temperature and moisture conditions. Weed Sci. 17:405–407.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P., McBeath, D. K., and vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Studies on the biology of wild oats. I. Dormancy, germination and emergence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:611–618.Google Scholar
Sionit, N., Hellmers, H., and Strain, B. R. 1980. Growth and yield of wheat under CO2 enrichment and water stress. Crop Sci. 20:687–690.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics—a biometrical approach. Singapore: McGraw Hill. pp. 377–400.Google Scholar
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. 1991. Plant Physiology. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin/Cummings. p. 97.Google Scholar
Zorner, P. S., Zimdahl, R. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1984. Sources of viable seed loss in buried dormant and non-dormant populations of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed in Colorado. Weed Res. 24:143–150.Google Scholar