Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:16:49.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Sugarcane Varieties to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rex W. Millhollon  and
Rouby J. Matherne
Rex W. Millhollon
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Houma, Louisiana, in cooperation with the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station
Rouby J. Matherne
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Houma, Louisiana, in cooperation with the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five herbicides were applied postemergence to three Louisiana sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) varieties. Nine or 12 lb/A of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (diuron) severely injured varieties C.P. 44-101 and C.P. 52-68, but variety N.Co. 310 was not affected. Conversely, N.Co. 310 was injured more by 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon) than the other varieties. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) + 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) at 10.6 plus 3 lb/A, reduced the yield of variety N.Co. 310 in one of 2 years only. This treatment had no adverse effect on yields of the other two varieties. All varieties appeared tolerant to 2,3,-6-trichlorophenylacetic acid (fenac) applied at 4 to 12 lb/A. Diuron injured a sensitive variety both when the foliage was sprayed and when only the ground at the base of the cane was sprayed. Plants treated in May were injured more than those treated 30 days earlier.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1968 , pp. 300 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1962. Simazine: degradation by corn seedlings. Science 135:373–374.Google Scholar
2. Hanson, N. S. 1959. Chemical weed control in Hawaii. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 10th Congr. 538–549.Google Scholar
3. Hanson, N. S. 1962. Weed control practices and research for sugar cane in Hawaii. Weeds 10:192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Lytle, S. A., McMichael, C. W., Green, T. W., and Francis, E. L. 1960. Soil Survey of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. U.S. Dept. Agr. Ser. 1956 (No. 1). 43 p.Google Scholar
5. Millhollon, R. W. 1964. Evaluation of fenac for control of Johnsongrass seedlings and other weeds in sugarcane. Sugar J. 26:22–26.Google Scholar
6. Stafford, T. J., Matherne, R. J., and Hebert, L. P. 1963. Sugarcane variety tests in Louisiana during 1962 with a summary for the five year period 1958–1962. Sugar Bull. 41(23):281–289.Google Scholar
7. Upchurch, R. P. 1958. The influence of soil factors on the phytotoxicity and plant selectivity of diuron. Weeds 6:161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar