Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:55:32.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) resistant to PSI-inhibiting herbicides and physiological responses to paraquat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Jéssica F. L. Leal Open the ORCID record for Jéssica F. L. Leal [Opens in a new window] ,
Amanda dos S. Souza Open the ORCID record for Amanda dos S. Souza [Opens in a new window] ,
Junior Borella Open the ORCID record for Junior Borella [Opens in a new window] ,
André Lucas S. Araujo Open the ORCID record for André Lucas S. Araujo [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Claudia Langaro Open the ORCID record for Ana Claudia Langaro [Opens in a new window] ,
Ana Carolina Chapeta Open the ORCID record for Ana Carolina Chapeta [Opens in a new window] ,
Eduardo S. Amorim Open the ORCID record for Eduardo S. Amorim [Opens in a new window] ,
Gabriela S. Silva Open the ORCID record for Gabriela S. Silva [Opens in a new window] ,
Sarah Morran Open the ORCID record for Sarah Morran [Opens in a new window]  and
Luiz Henrique S. Zobiole Open the ORCID record for Luiz Henrique S. Zobiole [Opens in a new window]
...Show all authors
Jéssica F. L. Leal
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Amanda dos S. Souza
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Junior Borella
Affiliation:
Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande–FURG, Institute of Biological Science, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
André Lucas S. Araujo
Affiliation:
Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Ana Claudia Langaro
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Ana Carolina Chapeta
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Eduardo S. Amorim
Affiliation:
Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Gabriela S. Silva
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Sarah Morran
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Luiz Henrique S. Zobiole
Affiliation:
Field Scientist, Corteva Agriscience, São Paulo, Brazil
Todd A. Gaines
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Camila F. de Pinho*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Camila F. de Pinho, Department of Crop Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro–UFRRJ, BR-465 Km 7 Seropédica, RJ23.890-000, Brazil. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant weed management is one of the greatest agricultural challenges in crop production. Thus, the quick identification of herbicide-resistant weeds is extremely important for management. This study aimed to evaluate resistance to PSI-inhibiting herbicides (diquat) and physiological response to paraquat application in Sumatran fleabane [Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walker; syn.: Erigeron sumatrensis Retz.]. The research was conducted with two C. sumatrensis biotypes, one susceptible and the other with multiple resistance to herbicides from five different modes of action (glyphosate, paraquat, diuron, saflufenacil, and 2,4-D). A dose–response assay was carried out to evaluate herbicide resistance to diquat in the paraquat-resistant C. sumatrensis biotype. The enzymatic activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and chlorophyll a (Chl a) fluorescence were measured in both biotypes after paraquat (400 g ai ha−1) application. The dose–response assay confirmed resistance of C. sumatrensis to diquat with resistance factor levels of 26-fold and 6-fold for LD50 and GR50 values, respectively, compared with the susceptible biotype. Accumulation of H2O2 occurred more rapidly in the paraquat-susceptible biotype than in the resistant one. Paraquat treatment caused an increase in SOD and APX activity in the susceptible biotype, but antioxidant enzyme activities were unaffected by paraquat in the resistant one at 5 h after application (HAA). Chl a fluorescence increased across the first 4 HAA in both resistant and susceptible biotypes. However, at 24 HAA, the resistant biotype showed a decline in fluorescence close to untreated plants, while the susceptible biotype died, confirming resistance to diquat in the paraquat-resistant C. sumatrensis biotype. The paraquat-resistant biotype does not induce antioxidative enzymes, as a possible mechanism of resistance to paraquat, but shows rapid recovery of photosynthesis and continuous growth when subjected to paraquat, while the paraquat-susceptible biotype does not survive.

Keywords

Chlorophyll a fluorescencediquatErigeron sumatrensisoxidative damageweed resistance
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 46 - 54
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Mithila Jugulam, Kansas State University

References

Apel, K, Hirt, H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azevedo Neto, AD, Prisco, JT, Enéas-Filho, J, de Abreu, CEB, Gomes-Filho, E (2006) Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ Exper Bot 5:87–94 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromilow, RH (2004) Paraquat and sustainable agriculture. Pest Manag Sci 60:340–349 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunharo, CA, Hanson, BD (2017) Vacuolar sequestration of paraquat is involved in the resistance mechanism in Lolium perenne L. spp. multiflorum. Front Plant Sci 8:1485 10.3389/fpls.2017.01485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunharo, CA, Patterson, EL, Carrijo, DR, Melo, MS de, Nicolai, M, Gaines, TA, Nissen, SJ, Christoffoleti, PJ (2016) Confirmation and mechanism of glyphosate resistance in tall windmill grass (Chloris elata) from Brazil. Pest Manag Sci 72:1758–1764 10.1002/ps.4205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caverzan, A, Piasecki, C, Chavarria, G, Stewart, CN, Vargas, L (2019) Defenses against ROS in crops and weeds: the effects of interference and herbicides. Int J Mol Sci 20:1086 10.3390/ijms20051086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dayan, FE, Zaccaro, MLM (2012) Chlorophyll fluorescence a as marker for herbicide mechanisms of action. Pestic Biochem Physiol 102:189–197 10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foyer, CH, Descourvieres, P, Kunert, KJ (1994) Protection against oxygen radicals: an important defense mechanism studied in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ 17:507–523 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00146.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, TA, Duke, SO, Morran, S, Rigon, CA, Tranel, PJ, Küpper, A, Dayan, FE (2020) Mechanisms of evolved herbicide resistance. J Biol Chem 295:10307–10330 10.1074/jbc.REV120.013572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giannopolitis, CN, Ries, SK (1977) Superoxide dismutase. Part I: occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314 10.1104/pp.59.2.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, SS, Tuteja, N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stresses tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassannejad, S, Lotfi, R, Ghafarbi, SP, Oukarroum, A, Abbasi, A, Kalaji, HM, Rastogi, A (2020) Early identification of herbicide modes of action by the use of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Plants 9:529 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkes, TR (2014) Mechanisms of resistance to paraquat in plants. Pest Manag Sci 70:1316–1323 10.1002/ps.3699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, I (2021) The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. http://weedscience.org. Accessed: June 3, 2021Google Scholar
Hess, FD (2000) Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Sci 48:160–170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaji, HM, Schansker, G, Ladle, RJ, Goltsev, V, Bosa, K, Allakhverdiev, SI, Brestic, M, Bussotti, F, Calatayud, A, Dąbrowski, P, Elsheery, NI, Ferroni, L, Guidi, L, Hogewoning, SW, Jajoo, A, et al. M (2014) Frequently asked questions about in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence: practical issues. Photosynth Res 122:121–158 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leal, JFL, Souza, AF, Ribeiro, SRS, Oliveira, GFPB, Araujo, ALS, Borella, J, Langaro, AC, Machado, AFL, Pinho, CF (2020) 2,4-D and haloxyfop-P-methyl interaction: sequential and interval applications to effectively control sourgrass (Digitaria insularis L.) and fleabane (Conyza spp. L.). Agron J 112:1216–1226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, ML, Hanson, BD (2017) Reduced translocation is involved in resistance to glyphosate and paraquat in Conyza bonariensis and Conyza canadensis from California. Weed Res 57:25–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, Y, Asada, K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880 Google Scholar
Niwa, Y, Ishimoto, K, Kanoh, T (1990) Induction of superoxide dismutase in leukocytes by paraquat: correlation with age and possible predictor of longevity. Blood 76:835–841 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Lewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piasecki, C, Carvalho, IR, Cechin, J, Goulart, FA, Maia, LCD, Agostinetto, D, Caverzan, A, Stewart, CN, Vargas, L (2019) Oxidative stress and differential antioxidant enzyme activity in glyphosate-resistant and-sensitive hairy fleabane in response to glyphosate treatment. Bragantia 78:379–396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, CF, Leal, JFL, Dos Santos, AS, Oliveira, GDPB, Oliveira, C, Langaro, AC, Machado, AFL, Christoffoleti, PJ, Zobiole, LHS (2019) First evidence of multiple resistance of Sumatran fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walker) to five-mode-of-action herbicides. Aust J Crop Sci 13:1688–1697 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.10.p1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, C (1994) Resistance to photosystem I disrupting herbicides. Pages 61–82 in Powles SB, Holtum JAM, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: LewisGoogle Scholar
Preston, C, Soar, CJ, Hidayat, I, Greenfield, KM, Powles, SB (2005) Differential translocation of paraquat in paraquat-resistant populations of Hordeum leporinum . Weed Res 45:289–295 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2005.00454.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyon, J Y, Piao, RZ, Roh, SW, Shin, SY, Kwak, SS (2004) Differential levels of antioxidants in paraquat-resistant and -susceptible Erigeron canadensis biotypes in Korea. Weed Biol Manag 4:75–80 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2004.00122.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227 10.1017/S0890037X00023253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, BJ, Strasser, RJ (1995) Measuring fast fluorescence transients to address environmental question: the JIP-test. Pages 977–980 in Mathis P, ed. Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic10.1007/978-94-009-0173-5_1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, RJ, Tsimilli-Michael, M, Srivastava, A (2004) Analysis of the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Pages 321–362 in Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee, eds. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration 19. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, JC (1988) Herbicide bioassay. Weed Res 28:479–484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szigeti, Z, Richter, P, Lichtenthaler, HK (1996) Fluorescence emission spectra of paraquat resistant Conyza canadensis during the chlorophyll fluorescence induction as determined by the CCD-OMA system. J Plant Physiol 148:574–578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, K, Hosokawa, M, Morita, S, Miura, R, Tominaga, T (2013) Resistance to paraquat in Mazus pumilus . Weed Res 53:176–182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velikova, V, Yordanov, I, Edreva, A (2000) Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci 15:59–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye, B, Gressel, J (2000) Transient, oxidant-induced antioxidant transcript and enzyme levels correlate with greater oxidant-resistance in paraquat-resistant Conyza bonariensis . Planta 211:50–61 10.1007/s004250000257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusuf, MA, Kumar, D, Rajwanshi, R, Strasser, RJ, Govindjee, TMM, Sarin, NB (2010) Overexpression of γ-tocopherol methyltransferase gene in transgenic Brassica juncea plants alleviates abiotic stress: physiological and chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements. Biochim Biophys Acta 1797:1428–1438 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leal et al. supplementary material

Leal et al. supplementary material

Download Leal et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 42.3 MB