Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:38:41.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial variability of atrazine and alachlor efficacy and mineralization in an eastern South Dakota field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zhuojing Liu ,
Sharon A. Clay  and
David E. Clay
Zhuojing Liu
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
David E. Clay
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landscape-induced differences in soil variability and other parameters have potential effects on herbicide sorption, persistence, degradation, and, ultimately, efficacy. This study examined the spatial variability of herbicide efficacy across an eastern South Dakota field in continuous corn. Atrazine and alachlor had been applied for the previous 10 yr. The spatial variability observed in weed control was compared with herbicide sorption (Kd), mineralization rate, and first-order half-life (t 1/2), and field herbicide dissipation rates (DT50). Spatial structure was present in atrazine mineralization, weed biomass, and corn biomass data. The amount of atrazine and alachlor sorbed to soil collected from the summit position of the field was 10 and 20% less, respectively, than the amounts sorbed to backslope or toeslope soils. Generally, both herbicides had faster mineralization rates and shorter t 1/2 in summit than in backslope or toeslope soils. Weed biomass was correlated positively with elevation and total amount of atrazine mineralized, whereas corn biomass was correlated negatively with these parameters. These findings suggest that weed control can be improved by accounting for the landscape positional effects on differential herbicide mineralization and dissipation in fields.

Keywords

Alachloratrazinecorn, Zea mays L.Precision applicationkrigingsorptiondissipationsite-specific management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 5 , October 2002 , pp. 662 - 671
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abdelhafid, R., Houot, S., and Barriuso, E. 2000. Dependence of atrazine degradation on C and N availability in adapted and nonadapted soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoozegard-Fard, A., Nielsen, D. R., and Warrick, A. W. 1982. Soil solute concentration distributions for spatially varying pore water velocities and apparent diffusion coefficients. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspelin, A. L. and Grube, A. H. 1999. Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage: 1996 and 1997 Market Estimates. 773-R-99-001. Updated: January 2000. Web page: www.epa.gov/oppbead1/pestsales/97pestsales. Accessed: January 2001. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Pesticide Program.Google Scholar
Chammas, G. A., Hutson, J. L., Hart, J. J., and DiTomaso, J. M. 1997. Microscale variability of atrazine and chloride leaching under field conditions. Weed Technol. 11:98–104.Google Scholar
Chesters, G., Simsiman, G. V., Levy, J., Alhajjar, G. J., Fathulla, R. N., and Harkin, J. M. 1989. Environmental fate of alachlor and metolachlor. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 11:1–74.Google Scholar
Clay, S. A., Koskinen, W. C., Allmaras, R. R., and Dowdy, R. H. 1988. Differences in herbicide adsorption on soil using several soil pH modification techniques. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 23:559–573.Google Scholar
Darmency, H. and Gasquez, J. 1990. Appearance and spread of triazine resistance in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Technol. 4:173–177.Google Scholar
Fournier, J. C., Catroux, C., Charnay, M. P., and Gunalan, . 1993. Behavior of soil microflora in pesticide degradation. Pages 199–208 In Mansour, M., ed. Fate and Prediction of Environmental Chemicals in Soils, Plants, and Aquatic Systems. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Gawronski, S. W. 1985. Inheritance of resistance to triazine herbicides by Echinochloa crus galli (L.). Pages 797–801 in Proceedings of the 5th International Congress Society for the Advancement of Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Humburg, D. 1999. Variable rate equpiment—technology for weed control. In Clay, D. E. et al., eds. Site Specific Management Guidelines. Web page: www.ppi-far.org/ssmg. Accessed: May 2001. Phosphate & Potash Institute, Norcross, GA: SSMG-7.Google Scholar
Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press. pp. 369–457.Google Scholar
Johansen, D. P., Clay, D. E., Carlson, C. G., Stange, K. W., Clay, S. A., and Dalsted, K. 1999. Selecting a DGPS for making topography maps. In Clay, D. E. et al., eds. Site Specific Management Guidelines. Web page: www.ppi-far.org/ssmg. Accessed: May 2001. Phosphate & Potash Institute, Norcross, GA: SSMG-14.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and Clay, S. A. 1997. Factors affecting atrazine fate in north central U.S. soils. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 151:117–165.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C., Reynolds, K. M., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., Barber, B. L., and Jarvis, L. J. 1993. Persistence and movement of sethoxydim residues in three Minnesota soils. Weed Sci. 41:634–640.Google Scholar
Mallawatantri, A. P. and Mulla, D. J. 1992. Herbicide adsorption and organic carbon contents on adjacent low-input versus conventional farms. J. Environ. Qual. 21:546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo, D. D. and Worcester, B. K. 1975. Soil fertility and crop responses to selected landscape positions. Agron. J. 67:397–401.Google Scholar
McGlamery, M. D. and Slife, F. W. 1966. The adsorption and desorption of atrazine as affected by pH, temperature, and concentration. Weeds. 14:237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J. M., Moorman, T. B., and Cambardella, C. A. 1997. Atrazine sorption at the field scale in relation to soils and landscape position. J. Environ. Qual. 26:1271–1277.Google Scholar
Oliveira, R. S. Jr., Koskinen, W. C., Ferreira, F. A., Khakural, B. R., Mulla, D. J., and Robert, P. J. 1999. Spatial variability of imazethapyr sorption in soil. Weed Sci. 47:243–248.Google Scholar
Ostrofsky, E., Traina, S. J., and Tuovinen, O. H. 1997. Variation in atrazine mineralization rates in relation to agricultural management practice. J. Environ. Qual. 26:647–657.Google Scholar
Paul, E. A. and Clark, F. E. 1989. Dynamics of residue decomposition and soil organic matter turnover. Pages 115–130 In Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pfost, D., Casady, W., and Shannon, K. 1999. Global positioning system receivers. In Clay, D. E. et al., eds. Site Specific Management Guidelines. Web page: www.ppi-far.org/ssmg. Accessed: May 2001. Phosphate & Potash Institute, Norcross, GA: SSMG-6.Google Scholar
Radosevich, M. S., Traina, S. J., Hao, Y. L., and Tuovinen, O. 1995. Degradation and mineralization of atrazine by a soil bacterial isolate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:297–302.Google Scholar
Rao, P.S.C., Edvardson, K.S.V., Ou, L. T., Jessup, R. E., Nkedi-Kiaaz, P., and Hornsby, A. 1986. Spatial variability of pesticide sorption and degradation parameters. Pages 100–115 In Garner, W. Y. et al., eds. Evaluation of Pesticide in Groundwater. American Chemical Society Symposium Series 315. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. 1986. Triazine resistant velvetleaf and giant foxtail control in no-tillage corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:50–52.Google Scholar
Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G., and Franz, E. H. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62:277–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, A. M. and Isensee, A. R. 1992. Effect of tillage systems and rainfall patterns on atrazine distribution in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 21:464–469.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scheunert, I. 1993. Transport and transformation of pesticides in soil. Pages 1–22 In Mansour, M., ed. Fate and Prediction of Environmental Chemicals in Soils, Plants, and Aquatic Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Sorenson, B. A., Koskinen, W. C., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., Lueschen, W. E., and Jorgenson, M. D. 1993. Formation and movement of 14C-atrazine degradation products in a sandy loam soil under field conditions. Weed Sci. 41:239–245.Google Scholar
Sorenson, B. A., Koskinen, W. C., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., Lueschen, W. E., and Jorgenson, M. D. 1994. Formation and movement of 14C-atrazine degradation products in a clay loam soil in the field. Weed Sci. 42:618–624.Google Scholar
Sorenson, B. A., Koskinen, W. C., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., Lueschen, W. E., and Jorgenson, M. D. 1995. Fate of 14C-atrazine in a silt loam soil. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 61:1–10.Google Scholar
Trangmar, B. B., Yost, R. S., and Uehara, G. 1985. Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv. Agron. 38:45–93.Google Scholar
Williams, L. III, Schotzko, D. J., and McCaffrey, J. P. 1992. Geostatistical description of the spatial distribution of Limonius californicus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) wireworms in the Northwestern United States, with comments on sampling. Environ. Entomol. 21:983–995.Google Scholar