Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:31:41.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Organic Matter Effect on Activity of Acetanilides, CDAA, and Atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. V. Parochetti
J. V. Parochetti*
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md. 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the influence of soil organic matter on herbicidal activity using four Pocomoke soils with organic matter contents of 4.8, 7.0, 11.9, and 17.0%. In field experiments, control of giant green foxtail [Setaria viridis var. major (Gaud.) Posp.] was greater than 75% from all treatments of 2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide (alachlor), 2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide (propachlor), and N,N-diallyl-2-chloroacetamide (CDAA) with no statistical differences between chemicals, rates, or organic matter levels. Control was statistically lower from all 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine (atrazine) treatments except 2.6 kg/ha at 7% organic matter and 4.4 kg/ha at 7 and 17% organic matter. Under greenhouse conditions, giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Hermm.) was used to establish GR50 values on soils or soil mixtures containing 0.8, 1.9, 3.9, 6.4, 11.0, and 18.7% organic matter for the herbicides used in the field study and for 2-chloro-N-(1-methyl-2-propynyl)acetanilide (prynachlor). Generally as organic matter levels increased, the GR50 values for herbicides increased; the rate of GR50 increase varied with herbicides. A ranking of herbicides from most toxic to least toxic is: propachlor>alachlor>prynachlor>CDAA. Atrazine GR50 values varied from a low similar to propachlor at 0.8% organic matter to 20 times greater than propachlor at 17% organic matter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1973 , pp. 157 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C. and Behrens, R. 1961. Phytotoxicity of simazine. Weeds 9:145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Day, B. E., Jordon, L. S., and Jolliffe, V. A. 1968. The influence of soil characteristics on the adsorption and phytotoxicity of simazine. Weed Sci. 16:209–213.Google Scholar
3. Hayes, M. H. B. 1970. Adsorption of triazine herbicides on soil organic matter, including a short review on soil organic matter chemistry. Residue Rev. 32:131–174.Google Scholar
4. Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 498 p.Google Scholar
5. Oliver, L. R. and Schreiber, M. M. 1971. Differential selectivity of herbicides on six Setaria taxa. Weed Sci. 19:428–431.Google Scholar
6. Parochetti, J. V. 1972. Herbicides for soil high in organic matter. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:31–35.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. and Holstun, J. T. Jr. 1961. Phytotoxicity of s-triazine herbicides to corn and weeds as related to structural differences. Weeds 9:592–599.Google Scholar
8. Sheets, T. J. 1959. The comparative toxicities of monuron and simazine in soil. Weeds 7:189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some s-triazines in soils. Weeds 13:46–52.Google Scholar
10. Timmons, F. D. and Coble, H. D. 1972. Performance of two acetanilide herbicides in organic soil in North Carolina. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:446–451.Google Scholar
11. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.Google Scholar
12. Upchurch, R. P., Selman, F. L., Mason, D. D., and Kamprath, E. J. 1966. The correlation of herbicidal activity with soil and climatic factors. Weeds 14:42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar