Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:56:26.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) seed production and viability as influenced by late-season postemergence herbicide applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Shane E. Taylor  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Valent USA Corporation, North Mankato, MN 56003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at the Main Experiment Station, Fayetteville, AR, in 1994 and 1995 to evaluate the effect of postemergence herbicides applied at late-season timings on sicklepod seed production and viability. AC 263,222, dicamba, glyphosate, glufosinate, and paraquat were applied at five rates (zero; labeled rate; one-half, one-fourth, and one-eighth the labeled rate) to three sicklepod growth stages (bud formation, flowering to 9-cm pods, and 15- to 30-cm pods). The greatest reduction in seed production occurred when herbicides were applied at the flowering to 9-cm pod growth stage. All herbicides applied at one-half the labeled rate to sicklepod at bud formation and at the flowering to 9-cm pod growth stage reduced seed production greater than 80%, except glufosinate. Regardless of herbicide, rate, or application timing, viability of remaining seed was ≥ 90% with all treatments.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1 H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineglufosinate, 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acidparaquat, 1,1‘-dimethyl-4,4’-bipyridinium ionsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia L. SENOBSoil seedbankseed numberssicklepod reproductionweed seed yieldAC 263,222chlorimurondicambaethephonglufosinateglyphosateimazaquinmetribuzinparaquat2,4-DBSENOB
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , August 1997 , pp. 497 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Biniak, B. M. and Aldrich, R. J. 1986. Reducing velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seed production with simulated-roller herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 34: 256–259.Google Scholar
Bozsa, R. C., Oliver, L. R., and Driver, T. L. 1989. Intraspecific and interspecific sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference. Weed Sci. 37: 670–673.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Bauman, P. A. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. in Bridges, D. C., ed. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States 1992. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, pp. 75–147.Google Scholar
Creel, J. M., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16: 396–400.Google Scholar
Currey, W. L., Teem, D. H., and Jordan, J. H. 1981. Sicklepod competition and control programs in Florida soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34: 66.Google Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seed after 2.5 years in a 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 26: 230–239.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of 2,4-D and dalapon on weed seed production and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26: 543–547.Google Scholar
Isaacs, M. A., Murdock, E. C., Toler, J. E., and Wallace, S. U. 1989. Effect of late-season herbicide applications on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed production and viability. Weed Sci. 37: 761–765.Google Scholar
Maun, M. A. and Cavers, P. B. 1969. Effects of 2,4-D on seed production and embryo development of curly dock. Weed Sci. 17: 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnayake, S. and Shaw, D. R. 1992a. Effects of harvest-aid herbicides on soybean (Glycine max) seed yield and quality. Weed Technol 6: 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratnayake, S. and Shaw, D. R. 1992b. Effects of harvest-aid herbicides on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed yield and quality. Weed Technol. 6: 985–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, B. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1990. Mutual influences of seedling johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20: 379–384.Google Scholar
Wixon, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 434–439.Google Scholar