Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:04:31.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection Pressure, Cropping System, and Rhizosphere Proximity Affect Atrazine Degrader Populations and Activity in s-Triazine–Adapted Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L. Jason Krutz ,
Robert M. Zablotowicz  and
Krishna N. Reddy
L. Jason Krutz*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production Systems Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
Robert M. Zablotowicz
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production Systems Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production Systems Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776, USA
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted on an s-triazine–adapted soil to determine the effects of s-triazine exclusion interval (1, 2, 3, or 4 yr), crop production system (continuous corn or continuous soybean), and rhizosphere proximity (bulk or rhizosphere soil) on atrazine degrader populations and activity. Atrazine degrader populations were quantified by a radiological Most Probable Number technique, while degrader activity was assessed via mineralization of ring-labeled 14C-atrazine. As the s-triazine exclusion interval increased, atrazine degrader populations declined exponentially, regardless of crop or rhizosphere proximity. Crop and exclusion interval interacted to affect degrader populations (P = 0.0043). Pooled over rhizosphere and bulk soil, degrader populations were 1.5-fold higher and declined 2.8-fold faster in soybean than corn. An interaction between rhizosphere proximity and exclusion interval was also noted (P = 0.0021), whereby degrader populations were 1.9-fold higher and declined 2.8-fold slower in rhizosphere compared with bulk soil, regardless of crop. The time required for 50% mineralization of ring-labeled 14C-atrazine (DT50) following exclusion of s-triazine herbicides increased linearly at a rate of 2.2 d yr−1. In contrast, the DT50 for this site prior to a known s-triazine application was 85 d and declined exponentially over 5 yr of successive atrazine applications: 24.5 d after 1 yr, 10.8 d after two successive years, and 3.8 d after five successive atrazine applications. Omitting s-triazines can reduce degrader populations and activity in adapted soils, but more than 4 yr is required to return mineralization kinetics to nonadapted levels, regardless of crop or rhizosphere proximity.

Keywords

Atrazines-triazinecorn, Zea mays Lsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrpersistencemineralizationatzABCDEFhalf-lifetrzN
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 516 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alvey, S. and Crowley, D. E. 1996. Survival and activity of an atrazine-mineralizing bacterial consortium in rhizosphere soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:1596–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P. E. and Lafuerza, A. 1992. Microbiological aspects of accelerated pesticide degradation. Pages 184–192 in Anderson, J. P. E., Arnold, D. J., Lewis, F., and Torstensson, L., eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Environmental Aspects of Pesticide Microbiology. Uppsala, Sweden Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2005. Fertilization and Insect Control Guidelines for Corn and Cotton. http://www.msucares.com/pubs/publications/. Accessed: January 4, 2012.Google Scholar
Arbeli, Z. and Fuentes, C. L. 2007. Accelerated biodegradation of pesticides: an overview of the phenomenon, its basis and possible solutions; and a discussion on the tropical dimension. Crop Prot. 26:1733–1746.Google Scholar
Cataldo, D. A., Haroon, M., Schrader, L. E., and Young, V. L. 1975. Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 6:71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutz, L. J., Burke, I. C., Reddy, K. N., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 2008. Evidence for cross-adaptation between s-triazine herbicides resulting in reduced efficacy under field conditions. Pest. Manag. Sci. 64:1024–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krutz, L. J., Burke, I. C., Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Price, A. J. 2009. Enhanced atrazine degradation: Evidence for reduced residual weed control and a method for identifying adapted soils and predicting herbicide persistence. Weed Sci. 57:427–434.Google Scholar
Krutz, L. J., Shaner, D. L., Weaver, M. A., Webb, R. M. T., Zablotowicz, R. M., Reddy, K. N., Huang, Y., and Thomson, S. J. 2010. Agronomic and environmental implications of enhanced s-triazine degradation. Pest Manag. Sci. 66:461–481.Google Scholar
Krutz, L. J., Zablotowicz, R. M., Reddy, K. N., Koger, C. H. III, and Weaver, M. A. 2007. Enhanced degradation of atrazine under field conditions correlates with a loss of weed control in the glasshouse. Pest. Manag. Sci. 63:23–31.Google Scholar
Lopez-Gutierrez, J. C., Philippot, L., and Martin-Laurent, F. 2005. Impact of maize mucilage on atrazine mineralization and atzC abundance. Pest Manage. Sci. 61:838–844.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, R. T., Allan, D. L., and Wackett, L. P. 1995. Isolation and characterization of a Pseudomonas sp. that mineralizes the s-triazine herbicide atrazine. Appl. Environ. MicroBiol. 61:1451–1457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchand, A. L., Piutti, S., Lagacherie, B., and Soulas, G. 2002. Atrazine mineralization in bulk and maize rhizosphere. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 35:288–292.Google Scholar
Martin-Laurent, F., Barres, B., Wagschal, I., Piutti, S., Devers, M., Soulas, G., and Philippot, L. 2006. Impact of the maize rhizosphere on the genetic structure, the diversity and the atrazine-degrading gene composition of cultivable atrazine-degrading communities. Plant Soil. 282:99–115.Google Scholar
Piutti, S., Hallet, S., Rousseaux, S., Philippot, L., Soulas, G., and Marin-Laurent, F. 2002. Accelerated mineralisation of atrazine in maize rhizosphere soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 36:434–441.Google Scholar
Radosevich, M., Traina, S. J., Hao, Y., and Tuovinen, O. H. 1995. Degradation and mineralization of atrazine by a soil bacterial isolate. Appl. Environ. MicroBiol. 61:297–302.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2004. Weed control and species shifts in bromoxynil- and glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) rotation systems. Weed Technol. 18:131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., Koger, C. H., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Krutz, L. J. 2006. Conventional and glyphosate-resistant cotton-corn rotation under reduced tillage: impact on soil properties, weed control, and yield. Weed Sci. 54:768–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, E. D., Fuhrmann, J. J., and Radosevich, M. 2003. Microbial community responses to atrazine exposure and nutrient availability: Linking degradation capacity to community structure. Microb. Ecol. 46:145–160.Google Scholar
Roeth, F. W. 1986. Enhanced herbicide degradation in soil with repeat application. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:45–65.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 1243–1246 in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Krutz, L. J., Henry, W. B., Hanson, B. D., Poteet, M. D., and Rainbolt, C. R. 2010. Sugarcane soils exhibit enhanced atrazine degradation and cross adaptation to other s-triazines. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technologists. 30:1–10.Google Scholar
Suett, D. L., Jukes, A. A., and Phelps, K. 1993. Stability of accelerated degradation of soil applied insecticides: laboratory behavior of aldicarb and carbofuran in relation to their efficacy against cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) in previously-treated field soils. Crop Prot. 12:431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, H. J. 1964. Distribution of lysine pathways among fungi: evolutionary implications. Am. Nat. 98:145–160.Google Scholar
Wackett, L. P., Sadowsky, M. J., Martinez, B., and Shapir, N. 2002. Biodegradation of atrazine and related s-triazine compounds: from enzymes to field studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58:39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woomer, P. L. 1994. Most probable number counts. in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Madison, WI ASA and SSSA.Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Krutz, L. J., Weaver, M. A., Accinelli, C., and Reddy, K. N. 2008. Glufosinate and ammonium sulfate inhibit atrazine degradation in adapted soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 45:19–26.Google Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Krutz, L. J., Weaver, M. A., Reddy, K. N., Koger, C. H. III, and Locke, M. A. 2007. Rapid development of enhanced atrazine degradation in a Dundee silt loam soil under continuous corn and in rotation with cotton. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:852–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., and Gaston, L. A. 2007. Tillage and cover effects on soil microbial properties and fluometuron degradation. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 44:27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., and Hoagland, R. E. 1997. Aromatic nitroreduction of acifluorfen in soils, rhizospheres and pure cultures of rhizobacteria. in Kruger, E. L., Anderson, T. A., and Coats, J. R., eds., Phytoremediation of Soil and Water Contaminants. ACS Symp. Ser. 664:Pages 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zablotowicz, R. M., Weaver, M. A., and Locke, M. A. 2006. Microbial adaptation for accelerated atrazine mineralization/degradation in Mississippi Delta soils. Weed Sci. 54:538–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar