Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:52:30.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rolled Rye Mulch for Weed Suppression in Organic No-Tillage Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adam N. Smith ,
S. Chris Reberg-Horton ,
George T. Place ,
Alan D. Meijer ,
Consuelo Arellano  and
J. Paul Mueller
Adam N. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
S. Chris Reberg-Horton*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
George T. Place
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Alan D. Meijer
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University Department of Soil Science, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, Plymouth, NC 27962
Consuelo Arellano
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
J. Paul Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
*
Corresponding author's Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rising demand for organic soybeans and high price premiums for organic products have stimulated producer interest in organic soybean production. However, organic soybean producers and those making the transition to organic production cite weed management as their main limitation. Current weed management practices heavily rely on cultivation. Repeated cultivation is expensive and has negative consequences on soil health. Research is needed to improve organic reduced tillage production. Rye cover crop mulches were evaluated for weed suppression abilities and effects on soybean yield. Experiments were planted in 2008 and 2009 at three sites. Rye was planted in the fall of each year and killed at soybean planting with a roller/crimper or flail mower, creating a thick weed-suppressing mulch with potential allelopathic properties. The mulch was augmented with one of three additional weed control tactics: preemergence (PRE) corn gluten meal (CGM), postemergence (POST) clove oil, or postemergence high-residue cultivation. Roll-crimped and flail-mowed treatments had similar weed suppression abilities at most sites. There were no differences between CGM, clove oil, or cultivation at most sites. Sites with rye biomass above 9,000 kg ha−1 of dry matter provided weed control that precluded soybean yield loss from competition. In Goldsboro 2008, where rye biomass was 10,854 kg ha−1 of dry matter, the soybean yield in the rolled rye treatment was not significantly different from the weed-free treatment, yielding at 2,190 and 2,143 kg ha−1, respectively. Likewise, no difference in soybean yield was found in Plymouth 2008 with a rye biomass of 9,256 kg ha−1 and yields of 2,694 kg ha−1 and 2,809 kg ha−1 in the rolled rye and weed-free treatments, respectively. At low rye biomass levels (4,450 to 6,606 kg ha−1), the rolled rye treatment soybean yield was 628 to 822 kg ha−1 less than the weed-free treatment. High rye biomass levels are critical to the success of this production system. However, high rye biomass was, in some cases, also correlated with soybean lodging severe enough to cause concern with this system.

Keywords

Clove oilcorn gluten mealsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrrye, Secale cereale LCover crop mulchweed suppressionroller/crimperorganic herbicides
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 224 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arshad, M. A., Schnitzer, M., Anger, D. A., and Ripmeester, D. A. 1990. Effects of till vs. no-till on the quality of soil organic matter. Soil Biol. BioChem. 22:595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, D. L. and Reeves, D. W. 2003. Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 18(1):37–45.Google Scholar
Bainard, L. D., Isman, M. B., and Upadhyaya, M. K. 2006. Phytotoxicity of clove oil and its primary constituent eugenol and the role of leaf epicuticular wax in the susceptibility to these essential oils. Weed Sci. 54:833–837.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1045–1057.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1987. Role of benzoxazinones in allelopathy by rye (Secale cereale L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 13:889–906.Google Scholar
Beale, O. W., Nutt, G. B., and Peele, T. C. 1955. The effects of mulch tillage on runoff, erosion, soil properties, and crop yields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 19:244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingaman, B. R. and Christians, N. E. 1995. Greenhouse screening of corn gluten meal as a natural control product for broadleaf and grass weeds. Hortscience. 30:1256–1259.Google Scholar
Boyd, N. S. and Brennan, E. B. 2006. Burning nettle, common purslane, and rye response to a clove oil herbicide. Weed Technol. 20:646–650.Google Scholar
Cavigelli, M. A., Teasdale, J. R., and Conklin, A. E. 2008. Long-term agronomic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region. Agron. J. 100:785–794.Google Scholar
Christians, N. E. 1993. The use of corn gluten meal as a natural preemergence weeds control in turf. Chapter 35. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 7:284–290.Google Scholar
Coleman, D. C., Crossley, D. A., and Hendrix, P. F. 2004. Fundamentals of Soil Ecology. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Burlington, MA: 386 p.Google Scholar
Creamer, N. G. and Dabney, S. M. 2002. Killing cover crops mechanically: Review of recent literature and assessment of research results. Am. J. Altern. Agr. 17(1):32–40.Google Scholar
Creamer, N. G., Plassman, B., Bennett, M. A., Wood, R. K., Stinner, B. R., and Cardina, J. 1995. A method for mechanically killing cover crops to optimize weed suppression. Am. J. Altern. Agr. 10(4):157–162.Google Scholar
Davis, A. S. 2010. Cover-crop roller-crimper contributes to weed management in no-till soybean. Weed Sci. 58:300–309.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. J. 2004. Evaluation of organic herbicides. Hortscience. 39:876 p.Google Scholar
Griggs, T. C. 2006. Fall and winter spring forage production and quality of winter cereals seeded at three fall dates. Forage and Grazinglands. DOI: . http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/fg/. Accessed: March 9, 2010.Google Scholar
Hargrove, W. L. 1990. Role of conservation tillage in sustainable agriculture. Pages 28–32 in Mueller, J. P., and Wagger, M. G., eds. Conservation Tillage for Agriculture in the 1990s: Proceedings of the 1990 Southern Regional Conservation Tillage Conference. Raleigh, NC North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. 1977. Farm Power and Machinery Management—Laboratory Manual and Workbook. 7th ed. Ames, IA Iowa State University Press. 365 p.Google Scholar
Kornecki, T. S., Price, A. J., Raper, R. L., and Arriaga, A. J. 2009. New roller crimper concepts for mechanical termination of cover crops in conservation agriculture. Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 24:165–173.Google Scholar
Liebl, R., Simmons, F. W., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1992. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:838–846.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Gallandt, E. 1997. Many little hammers: ecological approaches for management of crop-weed interactions. Page 78 in Jackson, L. E., ed. Agricultural Ecology. San Diego, CA Academic.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. C., Watkins, K. B., Teasdale, J. R., and Adbul-Baki, A. A. 2000. Cover crops in sustainable food production. Food Rev. Int. 16:121–157.Google Scholar
Masiunas, J. B., Weston, L. A., and Weller, S. C. 1995. The impact of rye cover crops on weed populations in the tomato cropping system. Weed Sci. 43:318–323.Google Scholar
Mirsky, S., Curran, W. S., Mortensen, D. A., Ryan, M. R., and Shumway, D. 2009. Control of cereal rye with a roller/crimper as influenced by cover crop phenology. Agron. J. 101:1589–1596.Google Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33:487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. J., Gillespie, T. J., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Effect of cover crop mulches on weed emergence, weed biomass, and soybean (Glycine max) development. Weed Technol. 8:512–518.Google Scholar
[NOP] National Organic Program. 2002. National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&navID=NationalListLinkNOPNationalOrganicProgramHome&rightNav1=NationalListLinkNOPNationalOrganicProgramHome&topNav=&leftNav=&page=NOPNationalList&resultType=&acct=nopgeninfo. Accessed: November 11, 2009.Google Scholar
[NC Ag Census] North Carolina Agricultural Census. 2007. Table 48: Organic Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/North_Carolina/st37_1_048_048.pdf. Accessed: November 11, 2009.Google Scholar
[OTA] Organic Trade Association. 2008. Organic Facts. http://www.ota.com/pics/documents/Mini%20fact%201-08%20confirming.pdf. Accessed: June 2, 2010.Google Scholar
Paustian, K., Cole, C. V., Sauerbeck, D., and Sampson, N. 1998. CO2 mitigation by agriculture: an overview. Clim. Change. 41:1480–1573.Google Scholar
Ranells, N. N. and Wagger, M. G. 1996. Nitrogen release from grass and legume cover crops monocultures and bicultures. Agron. J. 88:777–782.Google Scholar
Raper, R. L., Reeves, D. W., Schwal, E. B., and Burmester, C. H. 2000. Reducing soil compaction of Tennessee Valley soils in conservation tillage systems. J. Cotton Sci. 4:84–90.Google Scholar
Reeves, D. W., Price, A. J., and Patterson, M. G. 2005. Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage nontransgenic cotton. Weed Technol. 19:731–736.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. J., Lynch, D. H., Voroney, R. P., Martin, R. C., and Juurlink, S. D. 2008. Nutrient budgets of Ontario organic dairy farms. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88(1):107–114.Google Scholar
Rodale Institute. 2009. No-Till Revolution. http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/no-till_revolution. Accessed: March 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. C., McCarty, G. W., Shelton, D. R., and Teasdale, J. R. 2000. Denitrification and N mineralization from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Plant Soil. 227:283–290.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. R., Smith, R. G., Mortensen, D. A., Teasdale, J. R., Curran, W. S., Seidel, R., and Shumway, D. L. 2009. Weed–crop competition relationships differ between organic and conventional cropping systems. Weed Res. 49:572–580.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2006. Procedures Guide. Release 9.1.3. 2nd ed. Cary NCSAS Institute.Google Scholar
Six, J., Elliott, E. T., and Paustian, K. 1999. Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:1350–1358.Google Scholar
Snapp, S. S., Swinton, S. M., Labarta, R., Mutch, D., Black, J. R., Leep, R., Nyiraneza, J., and O'Neil, K. 2005. Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs, and performance within cropping system niches. Agron. J. 97:322–332.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85:673–680.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 2000. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci. 48:385–392.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. 2002. Herbicide effects of essential oils. Weed Sci. 50:425–431.Google Scholar
USDA. 2009a. North Carolina Grain Prices Paid to Producers by Location. North Carolina Department of Agriculture Market News. http://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/ra_gr110.txt. Accessed: January 5, 2010.Google Scholar
USDA. 2009b. National Organic Grain and Feedstuffs. USDA Livestock and Grain Market News. http://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/lsbnof.pdf. Accessed: January 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Walz, E. 1999. Third Biennial National Organic Farmers' Survey. Santa Cruz, CA Organic Farming Research Foundation. 126 p.Google Scholar
Webber, C. L. III, Shrefler, J. W., Brandenberger, L. P., Taylor, M. J., and Boydston, R. A. 2009. Organic herbicide update. Pages 237–239 in Proceedings of the 28th Horticulture Industries Show. Ft. Smith, AR.Google Scholar
Weersink, A., Walker, M., Swanton, C., and Shaw, J. E. 1992. Costs of conventional and conservation tillage systems. J. Soil Water Conserv. 47:328–334.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1990. Cover crop and herbicide influence on row crop seedling establishment in no-tillage culture. Weed Sci. 38:166–171.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860–866.Google Scholar
Wossink, G. A. A. and Kuminoff, N. 2002. Organic Agriculture in North Carolina. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service: North Carolina State Economist. September/October.1–4.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and York, A. C. 1996. Cover crops for herbicide replacement in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:815–821.Google Scholar