Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:56:48.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Response of Wild Garlic (Allium vineale) to the Timing of Spray Applications of Chlorsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Andrew Leys
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Fred W. Slife
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

The response of wild garlic (Allium vineale L. # ALLVI) to fall and spring applications of chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} was evaluated in the field in 1982 and 1983. In natural stands, application of 20 g ai/ha in the spring reduced aerial bulblet production by 99%. Applications in the fall were much less effective (20 g/ha reduced aerial bulblet production by 59%), but were still better than the standard treatment of 2,4-D applied in the spring (840 g ae/ha reduced aerial bulblet production by only 45%). In planted stands, chlorsulfuron was applied preemergence at two locations at 10 and 20 g/ha in the fall, and postemergence in early fall, late fall, early spring, and late spring. All treatments reduced aerial and underground bulb production, but spring applications were much more effective than any of the fall treatments. Application of 20 g/ha of chlorsulfuron in late spring (mid-to-late April) reduced aerial and underground bulb production by greater than 95%. At this time the old bulb reserves were exhausted, and the scape and new bulbs were at an early and rapid stage of development.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, L. E. and Peters, E. J. 1982. Today's weed: wild garlic. Weeds Today 13(4):78.Google Scholar
2. Binning, L. K. and Meggitt, W. F. 1966. Wild garlic control in winter wheat using herbicide combinations. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 21:92.Google Scholar
3. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation of crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861865.Google Scholar
4. Davis, F. S., Peters, E. J., and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. Effect of 2,4-D and 2,3,6-TBA on bulbs of wild garlic. Weed Sci. 13:210214.Google Scholar
5. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1981. Response of small-grain cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 29:414420.Google Scholar
6. Hakansson, S. 1963. Allium vineale L. as a weed with special reference to the conditions in south-western Sweden. Plant Husbandry 19:1208.Google Scholar
7. Kapusta, G. and Strieker, C. F. 1983. Wild garlic control in winter wheat, 1983. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40: 119.Google Scholar
8. Lobenstein, C. W. and Portz, H. L. 1956. Effectiveness of 2,4-D for control of wild garlic and wild onion in winter grains. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 13:3940.Google Scholar
9. Mersie, W. and Foy, C. L. 1984. Bioactivity of chlorsulfuron in five Virginia soils. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 257.Google Scholar
10. Peters, E. J. and McKelvey, R. A. 1982a. Herbicides and dates of application for control and eradication of wild garlic (Allium vineale). Weed Sci. 30:557560.Google Scholar
11. Peters, E. J. and McKelvey, R. A. 1982b. Postemergence herbicides for control of wild garlic in winter wheat. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:96.Google Scholar
12. Peters, E. J. and Stritzke, J. F. 1976. Wild garlic life cycle and control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Inf. Bull. No. 390. 22 pp.Google Scholar
13. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar