Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:26:57.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of swallow-wort to herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Frances M. Lawlor  and
Dudley J. Raynal
Dudley J. Raynal
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 350 Bray Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exotic plant, swallow-wort, a twining perennial of the Milkweed family, has become increasingly invasive in natural areas, successional old fields, and tree plantations on calcareous soils of the lower Great Lakes basin. Because mechanical control strategies are inadequate, swallow-wort's response in natural areas to foliar spray and cut-stem applications of glyphosate and triclopyr was evaluated. Foliar spray applications of glyphosate (3.1 and 7.8 kg ae ha–1) and triclopyr (1.9 kg ae ha–1) were more effective than cut-stem applications of the herbicides (3.1 kg ae ha–1 glyphosate, 1.4 kg ae ha–1 triclopyr). There were no statistical differences in effect among the foliar spray applications. Response to cut-stem application of glyphosate (3.1 and 6.2 kg ha–1) and triclopyr (1.4, 2.8, and 5.6 kg ha–1) in the following year indicated glyphosate to be more effective than triclopyr at all concentrations tested. To effect long-lasting control, all treatments require additional herbicide application.

Keywords

Glyphosatetriclopyrswallow-wort, Vincetoxicum rossicum (Kleo.) Barb., syn. Cynanchum rossicum KleoCynanchumdog-strangling vineswallow-wortblack swallow-wortinvasive plant
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 179 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. 1982. Herbicidal control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 30:349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, A. R. 1989. Greenbriar (Smilax sp.) control in blueberries. Proc. Annu. Meet. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:169.Google Scholar
Cramer, G. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Control of common milk-weed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 29:636–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, F. Z. 1971. Soil Survey of Cayuga County, New York. United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Cornell University Agricultural Station. 205 p.Google Scholar
Hutton, F. Z. and Rice, C. E. 1977. Soil Survey of Onondaga County, New York. United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Cornell University Agricultural Station. 235 p.Google Scholar
Isachsen, Y. W., Landing, E., Lauber, J. M., Rickard, L. V., and Rogers, W. B. 1991. Geology of New York, a simplified account. New York State Museum/Geology Survey, Albany, New York, pp. 67–136.Google Scholar
McDowell, L. 1989. Soil Survey of Jefferson County, New York. United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Cornell University Agricultural Station. 376 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. 1959. The dog-strangling vine Cynanchum medium, its chromosome number and its occurrence in Canada. Can. Field-Nat. 73:144–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1999. Climatological Data Monthly Summary, New York 110 (4,5,6,7,8).Google Scholar
Pearson, C. S., Child, R. B., Kennedy, W. E., Huff, W., and Lawrence, C. B. 1942. Soil Survey of Seneca County, New York. United States Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station. p. 52.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. S. 1973. The spread of Vincetoxicum species (Asclepiadaceae) in Ontario. Can. Field Nat. 87:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1997. Selected SAS® Documentation for APM 620: Analysis of Variance (Spring 1998). Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sheeley, S. E. 1992. The distribution and life history characteristics of V. rossicum (Vincetoxicum rossicum). . State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. Syracuse, N.Y. 126 p.Google Scholar
Sheeley, S. E. and Raynal, D. J. 1996. The distribution and status of species of Vincetoxicum rossicum in eastern North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123 (2): 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometric Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 137–171 (see also pp. 190–191 and pp. 377–400).Google Scholar
Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1985. Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption and translocation in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 33:299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalers, R. L., Burton, J. D., Maness, E. P., and Skroch, W. A. 1997. A stem cut and blade delivery method of herbicide application for weed control. Weed Sci. 45:829–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar