Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:02:59.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. M. Wax ,
L. A. Knuth  and
F. W. Slife
L. M. Wax
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr.
L. A. Knuth
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
F. W. Slife
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for 2 years at Urbana, Illinois, to evaluate the response of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr., var. Harosoy 63) to soil and foliar applications of 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba), 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram), and (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D). Soil incorporated applications of 2,4-D or dicamba at rates up to 8 oz/A or 4 oz/A, respectively, just before planting soybeans did not reduce soybean yields significantly. Picloram, applied under the same conditions, reduced soybean yield almost 40% at ½ oz/A. Picloram at rates from ½ to 2 oz/A caused slight to moderate leaf malformation on soybeans planted the following year but did not reduce yield. Foliar applications of 2,4-D up to 2 oz/A on soybeans had little effect on yield when applied at the prebloom stage and only slightly reduced yield when applied during flowering. Dicamba and picloram injured soybeans at the prebloom stage considerably more than did 2,4-D. Dicamba and picloram severely restricted soybean development, and reduced yield markedly when applied during flowering; ½ oz/A of dicamba or ⅛ oz/A of picloram reduced soybean yield about 50%.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1969 , pp. 388 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnold, W. R., Santelmann, P. W., and Lynd, J. Q. 1966. Picloram and 2,4-D effects with Aspergillus niger proliferation. Weeds 14:89–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. and Lavy, T. L. 1966. Dissipation of dicamba. Weeds 14:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Byrd, B. C. and Nyman, F. A. Jr. 1966. Progress report on highway vegetation control experiments using Tordon 101 Mixture and Norbak particulating agent. Down to Earth 22(1):28–31.Google Scholar
4. Duncan, D. B. 1965. A bayesian approach to multiple comparisons. Technometrics 7:171–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Fribourg, H. A. and Johnson, I. J. 1955. Response of soybean strains to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Agron. J. 47:171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Friesen, H. A. 1965. The movement and persistence of dicamba in soil. Weeds 13:30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gentner, W. A. 1964. Herbicidal activity of vapors of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid. Weeds 12:239–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hamaker, J. W., Johnston, H., Martin, R. T., and Redemann, C. T. 1963. A picolinic acid derivative: A plant growth regulator. Science 141:363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Hansen, J. R. and Freeman, J. F. 1951. Herbicidal tolerance of soybeans to post-emergence sprays. Res. Rept. NCWCC 8:85–86.Google Scholar
10. Herr, D. E., Stroube, E. W., and Ray, D. A. 1966. The movement and persistence of picloram in soil. Weeds 14:248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kalton, R. R., Weber, C. R., and Eldredge, J. C. 1949. The effect of injury simulating hail damage to soybeans. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 359. 61 p.Google Scholar
12. Reimer, C. A., Byrd, B. C., and Davidson, J. H. 1966. An improved helicopter system for the aerial application of sprays containing Tordon 101 Mixture particulated with Norbak. Down to Earth 22(1):3–6.Google Scholar
13. Rojas-Garciduenas, M. and Kommedahl, T. 1958. The effects of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on radicle development and stem anatomy of soybean. Weeds 6:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shaw, W. C. and Gentner, W. A. 1957. The selective herbicidal properties of several variously substituted phenoxyalkycarboxylic acids. Weeds 5:75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Slife, F. W. 1956. The effect of 2,4-D and several other herbicides on weeds and soybeans when applied as post-emergence sprays. Weeds 4:61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1965. Effects of chlorophenoxy herbicides on soybeans. Weeds 13:168–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar