Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:04:58.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Evaluation of Allelopathic Potentials in Soils: Total Activity Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Syuntaro Hiradate ,
Kenji Ohse ,
Akihiro Furubayashi  and
Yoshiharu Fujii
Syuntaro Hiradate*
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan
Kenji Ohse
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan
Akihiro Furubayashi
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan
Yoshiharu Fujii
Affiliation:
Biodiversity Division, National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, 3-1-3 Kan-nondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The allelopathic potential of a plant has been evaluated on the basis of two indicators: specific activity, which is the specific concentration of the allelochemical to exert a half-maximum effect on a receiver plant (EC50), and total activity in a plant, which is the ratio of the concentration of an allelochemical in the producing plant to its EC50. In the present study, a new indicator, total activity in a soil, which takes into account the effects of a soil on the allelopathy activity, is proposed because allelopathic activity is affected by the presence of soils. The total activity in a soil was calculated by multiplying the “total activity in a plant” with a “soil factor.” In this calculation, we assumed simplified cases for comparison, such that the allelopathic plant materials are evenly incorporated in the soils and the allelochemicals are released from the plant materials to the soils at a constant rate. We conducted bioassay experiments in the presence and absence of soils and cited some published data to calculate the specific activities and total activities in a plant and in a soil. The results indicated that the allelopathies of buckwheat caused by (+)-catechin, Leucaena leucocephala by L-mimosine, Xanthium occidentale by trans-cinnamic acid, and Brassica parachinensis by cis-cinnamic acid were not significant in a volcanic ash soil, an alluvial soil, and a calcareous soil, but the allelopathy of sweet vernalgrass caused by coumarin and Spiraea thunbergii by cis-cinnamoyl glucosides was highly effective in those soils. The allelopathies of Juglans species caused by juglone plus juglone precursors and Mucuna pruriens by L-DOPA would depend highly on the soil types. Although some limitations exist for this approach, the total activity approach would allow for a better quantitative estimation of the allelopathic potential of plant materials in soils.

Keywords

Brassica parachinensis BaileyJuglans speciesLeucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de WitMucuna pruriens (L.) DC. var. utilisSpiraea thunbergii Sieb. ex BlumeXanthium occidentale Bertolbuckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum Moenchsweet vernalgrass, Anthoxanthum odoratum L. AOXODL-DOPA, 3-(3′,4′-dihydroxyphenyl)-L-alanineAllelochemicalsEC50specific activityLactuca sativa LlettucejugloneL-mimosinecoumarin
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 258 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blakemore, L. C., Searle, P. L., and Daly, B. K. 1987. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report 80. 44.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. 1934. The method of probits. Science. 12:38–39.Google Scholar
Blum, U., Gerig, T. M., Worsham, A. D., and King, L. D. 1993. Modification of allelopathic effects of p-coumaric acid on morning glory seedling biomass by glucose, methionine, and nitrate. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:2791–2811.Google Scholar
Chon, S. U., Kim, Y. M., and Lee, J. C. 2003. Herbicidal potential and quantification of causative allelochemicals from several Compositae weeds. Weed Res. 43:444–450.Google Scholar
Chou, C-H. and Kuo, Y-L. 1986. Allelopathic research of subtropical vegetation in Tiwan: III. Allelopathic exclusion of understory by Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. J. Chem. Ecol. 12:1431–1448.Google Scholar
Coder, K. D. 1983. Seasonal changes of juglone potential in leaves of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.). J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1203–1212.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. F. 1978. Juglone inhibits pine growth under certain moisture regimes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:801–803.Google Scholar
Fujii, Y., Shibuya, T., and Yasuda, T. 1991. L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine as an allelochemical candidate from Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. var. utilis . Agric. Biol. Chem. 55:617–618.Google Scholar
Furubayashi, A., Hiradate, S., and Fujii, Y. 2005. Adsorption and transformation reactions of L-DOPA in soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 51:819–825.Google Scholar
Furubayashi, A., Hiradate, S., and Fujii, Y. 2007. Role of catechol structure in the adsorption and transformation reactions of L-DOPA in soils. J. Chem. Ecol. 33:239–250.Google Scholar
Hiradate, S. 2004. Strategies for searching bioactive compounds: total activity vs. specific activity. Pages AGFD7 U28. in. Proceedings of the 227th American Chemical Society National Meeting. Anaheim, CA: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Hiradate, S. 2006. Isolation strategies for finding bioactive compounds: specific activity vs. total activity. Pages 113–126. in Rimando, A. M. and Duke, S. O. eds. Natural Products for Pest Management. ACS Symposium Series 927. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Hiradate, S., Furubayashi, A., and Fujii, Y. 2005a. Changes in chemical structure and biological activity of L-DOPA as influenced by an andosol and its components. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 51:477–484.Google Scholar
Hiradate, S., Morita, S., Furubayashi, A., Fujii, Y., and Harada, J. 2005b. Plant growth inhibition by cis-cinnamoyl glucosides and cis-cinnamic acid. J. Chem. Ecol. 31:591–601.Google Scholar
Hiradate, S., Morita, S., Sugie, H., Fujii, Y., and Harada, J. 2004. Phytotoxic cis-cinnamoyl glucosides from Spiraea thunbergii . Phytochemistry. 65:731–739.Google Scholar
Inderjit, , and Dakshini, K. M. M. 1994. Allelopathic effect of Pluchea lanceolata (Asteraceae) on characteristics of four soils and tomato and mustard growth. Am. J. Bot. 81:799–804.Google Scholar
Inderjit, , and Mallik, A. U. 1996. The nature of interference potential of Kalmia angustifolia . Can. J. Forest. Res. 26:1899–1904.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Z., Hiradate, S., Noda, A., and Fujii, Y. 2003. Allelopathic activity of buckwheat: isolation and characterization of phenolics. Weed Sci. 51:657–662.Google Scholar
IUSS Working Group WRB 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. Rome: FAO World Soil Resources Reports 103. 128.Google Scholar
Jose, S. and Gillespie, A. R. 1998. Allelopathy in black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) alley cropping. II. Effects of juglone on hydroponically grown corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) growth and physiology. Plant Soil. 203:199–205.Google Scholar
Pue, K. J., Blum, U., Gerig, T. M., and Shafer, S. R. 1995. Mechanism by which noninhibitory concentrations of glucose increase inhibitory activity of p-coumaric acid on morning glory seedling biomass accumulation. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:833–847.Google Scholar
Reigosa, M. J. and Pazos-Malvido, E. 2007. Phytotoxic effects of 21 plant secondary metabolites on Arabidopsis thaliana germination and root growth. J. Chem. Ecol. 33:1456–1466.Google Scholar
Rietveld, W. J. 1983. Allelopathic effects of juglone on germination and growth of several herbaceous and woody species. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:295–308.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. K. 1988. Degradation of juglone by soil bacteria. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1561–1571.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. K., Lipson, D. A., and Raab, T. A. 2000. Effects of willows (Salix brachyearpa) on population of salicylate-mineralizing microorganisms in alpine soils. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:2049–2057.Google Scholar
Shibuya, T., Fujii, Y., and Asakawa, Y. 1994. Effects of soil factors on manifestation of allelopathy in Cytisus scoparius . J. Weed Sci. Technol. 39:222–228.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 2006. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 10th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 332.Google Scholar
Willis, R. J. 2000. Juglans spp., juglone and allelopathy. Allelopath. J. 7:1–55.Google Scholar
Xuan, T. D., Elzaawely, A. A., Deba, F., Fukuta, M., and Tawata, S. 2006. Mimosine in Leucaena as a potent bio-herbicide. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 26:89–97.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Y. 1995. Allelopathic potential of Anthoxanthum odoratum for invading Zoisia-grassland in Japan. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1365–1373.Google Scholar
Yin, Z., Wong, W., Ye, W., and Li, N. 2003. Biologically active cis-cinnamic acid occurs naturally in Brassica parachinensis . Chin. Sci. Bull. 48:555–558.Google Scholar