Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:28:02.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) Control as Influenced by Soil-Applied Vernolate and Trifluralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dane L. Bowers  and
Thomas T. Bauman
Dane L. Bowers
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Thomas T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under greenhouse conditions, jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) L. ♯3 DATST) grown in soil treated with vernolate (S-propyl dipropylthiocarbamate) was more sensitive to postemerence application of acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} and bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] than jimsonweed grown in untreated soil or soil treated with trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine). Vernolate followed by acifluorfen was more phytotoxic than acifluorfen alone. Bentazon applied to jimsonweed after a pretreatment with vernolate at 2.2 kg ai/ha was more effective than the same rate of bentazon applied alone. Trifluralin did not enhance the activity of acifluorfen or bentazon on jimsonweed. Laboratory studies showed that more acifluorfen was absorbed by vernolate-pretreated jimsonweed than by untreated jimsonweed. No differences in bentazon absorption between vernolate-pretreated and nontreated jimsonweed were measured.

Keywords

Acifluorfenbentazonherbicide absorptionherbicide interaction
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , July 1984 , pp. 451 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bucholtz, D. L. and Hess, F. D. 1983. An inexpensive combustion apparatus for preparation of radioactive samples. Weed Sci. 31:159–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Gentner, W. A. 1966. The influence of EPTC on external foliage wax deposition. Weeds 14:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hacker, L. A. and Banks, P. A. 1980. Influence of soil applied herbicides on subsequent foliar applications. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:32.Google Scholar
4. Hartnett, J. P. 1978. RH-6201 – A new postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:28–29.Google Scholar
5. Irons, S. M. and Burnside, O. C. 1982. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of bentazon in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Sci. 30:255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Johnson, B. J. 1971. Response of weeds and soybeans to vernolate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:372–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Johnson, B. J. 1971. Effects of sequential herbicide treatments on weeds and soybeans. Weed Sci. 19:695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Martin, J. R., Rieck, C. E., and Mangeot, B. L. 1978. Activity and accumulation of bentazon in cocklebur and giant ragweed. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:241.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D. and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Uptake and translocation of bentazon with additives. Weed Sci. 25:309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Norris, R. F. 1974. Penetration of 2,4-D in relation to cuticle thickness. Am. J. Bot. 61:74–79.Google Scholar
11. Periera, J. F., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Hopen, H. J. 1971. Mechanism of intraspecific selectivity of cabbage to nitrofen. Weed Sci. 19:647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Purdue University. 1981. Weeding with chemicals. Pub. No. ID-1. Coop. Ext. Serv. 59 pp.Google Scholar
13. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Penetration, translocation and metabolism of acifluorfen in soybean (Glycine max), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum). Weed Sci. 29:474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Robinson, C. W. and Gossett, B. J. 1969. Influence of vernolate on the selectivity of chloroxuron with surfactant for weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 21:120.Google Scholar
15. Rogers, R. L. and Crawford, S. H. 1980. Weed control in soybeans with acifluorfen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:50.Google Scholar
16. Russel, K. D. and Jeffrey, L. S. 1978. Response of morningglory, jimsonweed, velvetleaf, giant ragweed, and lambsquarters in soybeans to various overtop postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:57.Google Scholar
17. Sherman, M. E., Thompson, L. Jr., and Wilkinson, R. E. 1983. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Sicklepod surface wax response to photoperiod and S-(2,3-dichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate (diallate). Plant Physiol. 53:269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wilkinson, R. E. 1980. Ecotypic variation of Tamarix pentandra epicuticular wax and possible relationship with herbicide sensitivity. Weed Sci. 28:110–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar