Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:39:12.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological Basis for Reduced Glyphosate Efficacy on Weeds Grown Under Low Soil Nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Mithila
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
C. J. Swanton
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
R. E. Blackshaw
Affiliation:
AAFC, Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, Canada T1J 4B1
R. J. Cathcart
Affiliation:
Alberta Agricultural Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6H 5T6
J. Christopher Hall*
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Growth room studies were conducted to determine the physiological basis of reduced glyphosate efficacy under low soil nitrogen using velvetleaf, common ragweed, and common lambsquarters as model species. Glyphosate dose–response experiments of weeds grown under low (1.5 mM) and high (15 mM) soil N were conducted. Velvetleaf and common lambsquarters grown under low N required 169 g ae ha−1 glyphosate for a significant reduction in biomass, but only 84 g ae ha−1 were required when grown under high N. However, when common ragweed was grown under low or high soil N there was no significant difference in response to glyphosate at all doses tested. The reduced glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf and common lambsquarters under low N was primarily due to decreased herbicide translocation to the meristem. It appears that low N may decrease the net assimilation of carbon in plants, resulting in a decrease in the net export of sugars and hence glyphosate from mature leaves. Understanding the relationship between soil N and herbicide efficacy may help explain observed weed control failures with glyphosate and may contribute to our knowledge of the occurrence of weed patchiness in fields. This is the first report illustrating a physiological basis for decreased glyphosate efficacy under low soil N in selected weed species.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baird, D. D., Brown, R. H., and Phatak, S. C. 1974. Influence of pre-emergence herbicides, nitrogen, sod density, and mowing on post-emergence activity of glyphosate for quackgrass control. Northeast Weed Sci Soc. 28:7686.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Brandt, R. N., Janzen, H. H., Eatz, T., Grant, C. A., and Derksen, D. A. 2003. Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Sci. 51:532539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, R. J., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 2004. Fertilizer rate and response of weeds to herbicides. Weed Sci. 52:291296.Google Scholar
Dickson, R. L., Andrews, M., Field, R. J., and Dickson, E. L. 1990. Effect of water stress, nitrogen, and gibberellic acid on fluazifop and glyphosate activity on oats (Avena sativa). Weed Sci. 38:5461.Google Scholar
Di Tomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491497.Google Scholar
Doll, J. D., Penner, D., and Meggiti, W. F. 1970. Herbicide and phosphorous influence on root absorption of amiben and atrazine. Weed Sci. 18:357–59.Google Scholar
Evans, J. R. 1983. Nitrogen and photosynthesis in the flag leaf of wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Plant Physiol. 72:297302.Google Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Glyphosate A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Geiger, D. R., Kapitan, S. W., and Tucci, M. A. 1986. Glyphosate inhibits photosynthesis and allocation of carbon to starch in sugar beet leaves. Plant Physiol. 82:468472.Google Scholar
Geiger, D. R., Tucci, M. A., and Serviates, J. C. 1987. Glyphosate effect on carbon assimilation and gas exchange in sugar beet leaves. Plant Physiol. 85:365369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gougler, J. A. and Geiger, D. R. 1984. Carbon partitioning and herbicide transport in glyphosate-treated sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 32:546551.Google Scholar
Seemann, J. R. and Sharkey, T. D. 1986. Salinity and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and metabolite pool size in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 82:555560.Google Scholar
Serviates, J. C., Tucci, M. A., and Geiger, D. R. 1987. Glyphosate effects on carbon assimilation, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and metabolite levels in sugar beet leaves. Plant Physiol. 85:370374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Lyon, J. L. 1979. Stomatal cycling in Phaseolus vulgaris in response to glyphosate. Plant Sci. Lett. 15:8387.Google Scholar
Steinrucken, H. C. and Amrhein, N. 1980. The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvyl shikimatic acid-2-phosphate synthase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 94:12071212.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1986. Nitrogen limited growth in plants from different successional stages. Ecology. 67:555563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar