Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:38:20.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mist Blowing Versus Other Methods of Foliar Spraying for Hardwood Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fred A. Peevy
Affiliation:
Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, Louisiana
Homer A. Brady
Affiliation:
Southern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, Louisiana

Abstract

A tractor-mounted mist blower was as effective as a high-volume ground sprayer or an airplane sprayer for applying herbicides to control hardwoods in two tests in central Louisiana. Two lb/A of butoxyethanol ester of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) were slightly better than one, and May treatments were more effective than August treatments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. MacConnell, W. P. and Bond, R. S. 1961. Application of herbicides with mist blowers: a promising method for releasing conifers. J. Forest. 59:427432.Google Scholar
2. Miller, W. F. and Starr, J. W. 1963. Role of moisture regime in pine and hardwood kill. Proc. SWC 16:223231.Google Scholar
3. Peevy, F. A. and Burns, P. Y. 1959. Effectiveness of aerial application of herbicides for hardwood control in Louisiana. Weeds 7:463469.Google Scholar
4. Potts, S. F. 1961. Controlling woody plants with minimum damage to pines. Forest Farmer 20(6): 10, 16–17.Google Scholar
5. Starr, J. W. 1961. Mist blower-injector combination for forest weed tree control. Proc. SWC 14:228236.Google Scholar
6. Ray, Hurlon. 1957. New developments in chemical brush control in Arkansas. Proc. Soc. Amer. Forest. 1956:5558.Google Scholar