Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:12:39.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism of Intraspecific Selectivity of Cabbage to Nitrofen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Francisco Pereira
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Walter E. Splittstoesser
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Herbert J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Dep. of Hort., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Abstract

The plant characteristics which makes ‘Hybelle’ cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) relatively tolerant while ‘Rio Verde’ is susceptible to the toxic action of 2,4-dichlorophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ether (nitrofen) were investigated. No differences between ‘Hybelle’ and ‘Rio Verde’ were found in growth rates, light or dark germination, or stomata density. Little xylem or phloem translocation of nitrofen-14C occurred. Disruption and removal of the cuticle of ‘Hybelle’ increased its susceptibility to nitrofen while ‘Rio Verde’ with more than normal wax deposition was tolerant. Plants with less cuticle were more susceptible, regardless of cultivar. ‘Hybelle’ had more wax per unit surface than ‘Rio Verde’ and wax deposition increased with leaf age. Both cultivars were equally tolerant to nitrofen when 6 weeks old. ‘Rio Verde’ leaves absorbed nitrofen-14C twice as fast as ‘Hybelle’ leaves. The results show that the mechanism of intraspecific selectivity of cabbage to nitrofen is dependent on the amount of cuticular wax on the leaves at the time of nitrofen application.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1964. Differential response of corn inbreds to simazine and atrazine. Weeds 12:6061.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. 1958. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4-D in sugar cane and bean plants. Weeds 6:257262.Google Scholar
3. Comstock, J. E. and Andersen, R. N. 1968. An inheritance study of tolerance to atrazine in a cross of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). Crop Sci. 8:508509.Google Scholar
4. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, . 1964. The Autoradiography of Plant Materials. California Exp. Sta. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
5. Denna, D. W. 1970. Transpiration and the waxy bloom in Brassica oleracea L. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23:2731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gentner, W. A. 1966. The influence of EPTC on external foliage wax deposition. Weeds 14:2731.Google Scholar
7. Hammerton, J. L. 1969. Intraspecific variation in spray retention. Weed Res. 9:154157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Herrett, R. A. and Linck, A. J. 1961. Penetration of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole in Canada thistle and field bindweed. Weeds 9:224230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The Water-culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 347. 39 p.Google Scholar
10. Holly, K. 1956. Penetration of chlorinated phenoxyacetic acids into leaves. Ann. Applied Biol. 44:195199.Google Scholar
11. Hopen, H. J. 1969. Selectivity of nitrofen between cabbage cultivars. HortScience 4:119120.Google Scholar
12. Hopen, H. J. and Doll, C. C. 1969. Procedure and results of investigations for weed control in a minor crop: Horseradish. Proc. North Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:54.Google Scholar
13. Hopen, H. J., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Butler, J. D. 1966. Intra-species bentgrass selectivity of siduron. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 89:631635.Google Scholar
14. Kempen, H., Agamalian, H., Lange, A. H., and Brendler, R. 1968. Weed control in carrots, celery and parsley. California Agr. 22:23.Google Scholar
15. Kolattukudy, P. E. 1970. Biosynthesis of cuticular lipids. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 21:163192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kolattukudy, P. E. 1970. Cutin biosynthesis in Vicia faba leaves. Plant Physiol. 46:759760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Lange, A. H., Agamalian, H., Brendler, R., and Snyder, M. 1968. Weed control in cole crops. California Agr. 22:1012.Google Scholar
18. Lhoste, J. and Vernie, F. 1968. Possibility of using nitrofen (2,4-dichlorophenyl-4′-nitrophenyl ether) in wheat cultures. C. R. Jr. Etud. Herb. COLUMA, 4th Conf. 1:7482.Google Scholar
19. Macey, M. J. K. 1970. The effect of light on wax synthesis in leaves of Brassica oleracea. Phytochemistry 9:757761.Google Scholar
20. Mitchell, J. W., Smale, B. C., and Metcalfe, R. L. 1960. Absorption and translocation of regulators and compounds used to control plant diseases and insects. Adv. Pest. Control Res. 3:369437.Google Scholar
21. Ries, S. K. and Terry, C. W. 1952. The design and evaluation of a small-plot sprayer. Weeds 1:160173.Google Scholar
22. Schieferstein, R. H. and Loomis, W. E. 1959. Development of cuticle in Angiosperm leaves. Amer. J. Bot. 46:625635.Google Scholar
23. Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility differences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12:1922.Google Scholar
24. Whitworth, J. W. 1964. The reaction of strains of field bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 12:57.Google Scholar