Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:32:02.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism of Glyphosate Tolerance in Birdsfoot Trefoil (Lotus corniculatus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chris M. Boerboom
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
David A. Somers
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

The mechanism of glyphosate tolerance was investigated in nine birdsfoot trefoil selections that exhibited a threefold difference in glyphosate tolerance. Single-stemmed ramets (vegetative clones) established from the nine selections were used to evaluate tolerance to glyphosate, spray retention, and 14C-glyphosate absorption and translocation in growth chamber experiments. The tolerance of greenhouse-grown ramets correlated with the tolerance of field-grown plants, indicating that tolerance was not a function of plant size or affected by environment. The nine selections differed in spray retention and 14C-glyphosate translocation but not in glyphosate absorption. The differences in retention and translocation were not correlated with the level of glyphosate tolerance but could contribute to the tolerance of an individual plant. The specific activity of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) (EC 2.5.1.19) ranged from 1.3 to 3.5 nmol min−1 mg−1 protein among the nine selections assayed and was positively correlated with plant tolerance level. These results indicate that the primary mechanism of glyphosate tolerance in birdsfoot trefoil is based on the level of EPSPS activity.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Amrhein, N., Johanning, D., Schab, J., and Schulz, A. 1983. Biochemical basis for glyphosate-tolerance in a bacterium and a plant tissue culture. FEBS Lett. 157:191196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boerboom, C. M. 1989. Selection and characterization of glyphosate tolerance in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Minnesota. 67 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248254.Google Scholar
4. Comai, L., Facciotti, D., Hiatt, W. R., Thompson, G., Rose, R. E., and Stalker, D. M. 1985. Expression in plants of a mutant aroA gene from Salmonella typhimurium confers tolerance to glyphosate. Nature 317:741744.Google Scholar
5. Coupland, D. 1985. Metabolism of glyphosate in plants. Pages 2534 in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D., ed. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Butterworth and Co., Boston, MA.Google Scholar
6. Dyer, W. E., Weller, S. C., Bressan, R. A., and Herrmann, K. M. 1988. Glyphosate tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Plant Physiol. 88:661666.Google Scholar
7. Gottrup, O., O'Sullivan, P. A., Schraa, R. J., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Uptake, translocation, metabolism and selectivity of glyphosate in Canada thistle and leafy spurge. Weed Res. 16:197201.Google Scholar
8. Marquis, L. Y., Comes, R. D., and Yang, C. P. 1979. Selectivity of glyphosate in creeping red fescue and reed canarygrass. Weed Res. 19:335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mousdale, D. M. and Coggins, J. R. 1986. Rapid chromatographic purification of glyphosate-sensitive 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase from higher plant chloroplasts. J. Chromatogr. 367:217222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Nafziger, E. D., Widholm, J. M., Steinrucken, H. C., and Killmer, J. L. 1984. Selection and characterization of a carrot cell line tolerant to glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 76:571574.Google Scholar
11. Neal, J. C., Skroch, W. A., and Monaco, T. J. 1985. Effects of plant growth stage on glyphosate absorption and transport in ligustrum (Ligustrum japonicum) and blue pacific juniper (Juniperus conferta). Weed Sci. 34:115121.Google Scholar
12. Rubin, J. L., Gaines, C. G., and Jensen, R. A. 1984. Glyphosate inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase from suspension-cultured cells of Nicotiana silvestris . Plant Physiol. 75:839845.Google Scholar
13. Shah, D. M., Horsch, R. B., Klee, H. J., Kishore, G. M., Winter, J. A., Tumer, N. E., Hironaka, C. M., Sanders, P. R., Gasser, C. S., Aykent, S., Siegel, N. R., Rogers, S. G., and Fraley, R. T. 1986. Engineering herbicide tolerance in transgenic plants. Science 233:478481.Google Scholar
14. Smith, C. M., Pratt, D., and Thompson, G. A. 1986. Increased 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid 3-phosphate synthase activity in a glyphosate-tolerant variant strain of tomato cells. Plant Cell Rep. 5:298301.Google Scholar
15. Steinrucken, H. C., and Amrhein, N. 1980. The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 94:12071212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Steinrucken, H. C., Schulz, A, Amrhein, N., Porter, C. A., and Fraley, R. T. 1986. Overproduction of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate- 3-phosphate synthase in a glyphosate-tolerant Petunia hybrida cell line. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 244:169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wyse, D. L. 1986. Regrowth of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) following postemergence application of haloxyfop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:664668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Waldecker, M. A. and Wyse, D. L. 1985. Soil moisture effects on glyphosate absorption and translocation in common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Weed Sci. 33:299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar