Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:05:04.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of Propanil and Selected Insecticides on Rice (Oryza sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Khosro Khodayari
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Rice Res. and Ext. Center
Roy J. Smith Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric, Stuttgart, AR 72160
N. Philip Tugwell
Affiliation:
Univ. Arkansas, Rice Res. and Ext. Center

Abstract

Field experiments determined the potential interaction of insecticides and propanil [N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl) propanamide] in drill-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Bond’). The carbamate insecticides carbaryl (1-naphthylmethylcarbamate) and methomyl {S-methyl N-[(methylcarbamoyl) oxy] thioacetimidate} interacted more severely with propanil than the organophosphate methyl parathion [O,O-dimethyl O-(p-nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate] in emulsifiable or encapsulated formulations. Carbaryl and methomyl injured rice vegetatively when applied from 7 days before to 4 days after propanil. Carbaryl was the only insecticide that interacted with propanil to reduce rice grain yield. Insecticides interacted adversely with propanil on rice grain yield when they were applied 2 days before propanil treatment. Insecticide interactions with propanil from most to least phytotoxic to rice plants for all times of application were: carbaryl > methomyl > emulsifiable methyl parathion > encapsulated methyl parathion.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literatur Cited

1. Anonymous. 1985. Insecticide recommendations for Arkansas. Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv. Misc. Publ. 144. 127 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1984. Agricultural Statistics. U.S. Dep. Agric. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 558 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bowling, C. C. and Flinchum, W. T. 1968. Interaction of propanil with insecticides applied as seed treatments on rice. J. Econ. Entomol. 16:6769.Google Scholar
4. El-Refai, A. R. and Movafy, M. 1973. Interaction of propanil with insecticides absorbed from soil and translocated into rice plants. Weed Sci. 21:246248.Google Scholar
5. Frear, D. S. and Still, G. G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913920.Google Scholar
6. Huey, B. A. 1971. Rice production in Arkansas. Arkansas Agric. Ext. Serv. Circ. 476. 46 pp.Google Scholar
7. Matsunaka, S. 1967. Propanil hydrolysis: Inhibition in rice plants by insecticides. Science 160:13601361.Google Scholar
8. Robinson, J. F., Smith, C. M., and Trahan, G. B. 1982. Propanilinsecticide interaction: effect on plant height and yield. Pages 256257 in Rice Exp. Stn. Annu. Prog. Rpt. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Crowley, LA.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R. J. Jr., Flinchum, W. T., and Seaman, D. E. 1977. Weed control in U.S. rice production. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 497, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC. 78 pp.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. J. Jr. and Tugwell, N. P. 1975. Propanil-carbofuran interactions in rice. Weed Sci. 23:176178.Google Scholar
11. Yih, R. H., McRae, D. H., and Wilson, H. F. 1968. Mechanisms of selective action of 3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide. Plant Physiol. 43:12911296.Google Scholar