Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:55:20.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Plants for Water is Affected by Their Interaction for Light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clay D. Salisbury  and
James M. Chandler
Clay D. Salisbury
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Amarillo, TX 79106
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transpirations of cotton and velvetleaf plants competing for water and light were estimated with heat balance stem flow gauges in a controlled environment. Cotton and velvetleaf plants were grown together in pots and monitored during fluctuations in soil water, irradiance, air temperature, and humidity. Shading from other plants imposed light competition on velvetleaf or cotton. Velvetleaf used significantly more water than cotton given ample water and light. Transpiration by both species was reduced in dry soil, but velvetleaf transpiration was reduced primarily by leaf abscision, while cotton leaves did not abscise. Both cotton and velvetleaf plants transpired significantly less when shaded. Leaf water potentials indicated that shaded plants experienced reduced evaporative demand suggesting that shading reduced plant stress in dry soil. Competition for water was strongly influenced by competition for light.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. #3 ABUTHcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Water competitionlight competitionstem flow gauge
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 69 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aldrich, R. J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technol. 1:199–206.Google Scholar
2. Baker, J. M. and van Bavel, C.H.M. 1987. Murement of mass flow of water in stems of herbaceous plants. Plant Cell Environ. 10:777–782.Google Scholar
3. Banks, P. A., Tripp, T. N., Wells, J. W., and Hammel, J. E. 1985. Effect of tillage on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference with soybeans (Glycine max) and soil water use. Weed Sci. 34:143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Begonia, G. B., Aldrich, R. J., and Salisbury, C.D. 1991. Soybean yield and yield components as influenced by canopy heights and duration of competition of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). Weed Res. 31:117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Campbell, G. S. 1977. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York. 159 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ehrler, W. L., van Bavel, C.H.M., and Nakayama, F. S. 1966. Transpiration, water absorption, and internal water balance of cotton plants as affected by light and changes in saturation deficit. Plant Physiol. 41:71–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and soybean (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–212.Google Scholar
8. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Stone, J. F. 1988. Soil water relations of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 36:740–746.Google Scholar
9. Griffin, B. S., Shilling, D. G., Bennett, J. M., and Currey, W. L. 1989. The influence of water stress on the physiology and competition of soybean (Glycine max) and Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum). Weed Sci. 37:544–551.Google Scholar
10. Ham, J. M. and Heilman, J. L. 1990. Dynamics of a heat balance stem flow gauge during high flow. Agron. J. (In Press.) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Keisling, T. C., Oliver, L. R., Crowley, R. H., and Baldwin, F. L. 1984. Potential use of response surface analyses for weed management in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:552–557.Google Scholar
12. Monteith, J. L. and Unsworth, M. H. 1990. Principles of Environmental Physics. 2nd ed. Edward Arnold, London. 291 pp.Google Scholar
13. Mortensen, D. A. and Coble, H. D. 1989. The influence of soil water content on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:76–83.Google Scholar
14. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T., and Hons, F. M. 1986. Soybean (Glycine max)-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interspecific competition. Weed Sci. 34:647–653.Google Scholar
15. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., Cothren, J. T. 1987. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic parameters of soybean (Glycine max) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 35:15–21.Google Scholar
16. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1983. Comparative water relations, photosynthesis, and growth of soybean (Glycine max) and seven associated weeds. Weed Sci. 31:318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Patterson, D. T. 1988. Growth and water relations of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) during simulated drought and recovery. Weed Sci. 36:318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Patterson, D. T., Highsmith, M. T., and Flint, E. P. 1988. Effects of temperature and CO2 concentration on the growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 36:751–757.Google Scholar
19. Regnier, E. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1989. The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37:187–195.Google Scholar
20. Regnier, E. E., Stoller, E. W., and Nafzinger, E. D. 1989. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) root and shoot interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Regnier, E. E., Salvucci, M. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1989. Photosynthesis and growth responses to irradiance in soybean (Glycine max) and three broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. 36:487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Riffle, M. S. 1988. Biological and biochemical interactions between devilsclaw (Proboscidea louisianica) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State Univ. 120 pp.Google Scholar
23. Sakuratani, T. 1981. A heat balance method for measuring water flux in the stem of intact plants. J. Agric. Meteorol. 37:9–17.Google Scholar
24. Salisbury, C. D. and Chandler, J. M. 1989. A stem flow gauge to measure water use of competing weeds and crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:294.Google Scholar
25. Sharkey, T. D. and Raschke, K. 1981. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiol. 68:33–40.Google Scholar
26. Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989. Response of soybean (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570–574.Google Scholar
27. Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Van Bavel, C.H.M., Lascano, R. L., and Wilson, D. R. 1978. Water relations of fritted clay. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 42:657–659.Google Scholar