Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:36:14.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) Density and Duration of Interference on Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frank L. Young ,
Donald L. Wyse  and
Robert J. Jones
Frank L. Young
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Donald L. Wyse
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Robert J. Jones
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.] density and duration of interference on soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] was investigated in two studies. In the density study, the average reduction in soybean yield by quackgrass densities of 520 and 910 shoots/m2 was 19 and 55%, respectively. Quackgrass densities of 95 and 160 shoots/m2 did not significantly reduce soybean yields. The number of branches that produced pods, the number of pods and seeds per plant, and soybean height were reduced by the two highest densities. In 1980, quackgrass densities of 265 and 595 shoots/m2 reduced soybean leaf area and plant dry weight. Leaf area partitioning (LAP), leaf weight partitioning (LWP), and net assimilation rate (NAR) of soybeans were reduced by a quackgrass density of 595 shoots/m2. In the duration study, interference by a natural stand of quackgrass for 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and full-season decreased soybean yield an average of 11, 23, and 33%, respectively. Results from the duration study suggest that a selective postemergence herbicide for the control of quackgrass in soybeans would be beneficial if available.

Keywords

Competitionleaf areanet assimilation ratepartitioning coefficients
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , November 1982 , pp. 614 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition on soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562–565.Google Scholar
3. Coble, H. D. and Ritter, R. L. 1978. Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum) interference in soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 26:556–559.Google Scholar
4. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Vernice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:224–228.Google Scholar
5. Elakkad, M. A. and Behrens, R. 1978. Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] competition with corn and soybeans for water, nutrients, and light. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 65.Google Scholar
6. Geddes, R. D., Scott, H. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Growth and water use by common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and soybeans (Glycine max) under field conditions. Weed Sci. 27:206–212.Google Scholar
7. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti . Weed Sci. 28:729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. Weeds. 10:26–29.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kommedahl, T., Old, K. M., Ohman, J. H., and Ryan, E. W. 1970. Quackgrass and nitrogen effects on succeeding crops in the field. Weed Sci. 18:29–32.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max . Weed Sci. 27:58–64.Google Scholar
12. Modani, M. K., Knake, E. L., and Slife, F. W. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:216–218.Google Scholar
13. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.Google Scholar
14. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–487.Google Scholar
15. Orwick, P. L. and Schreiber, M. M. 1979. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and robust foxtail (Setaria viridis var. robusta-alba or var. robusta-purpurea) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:665–674.Google Scholar
16. Potter, J. R. and Jones, J. W. 1977. Leaf area partitioning as an important factor in growth. Plant Physiol. 59:10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.Google Scholar
18. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds. 14:49–51.Google Scholar
19. Wyse, D. L. 1980. Vernolate for augmentation of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 28:654–657.Google Scholar