Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:22:28.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Environmental Factors and Adjuvants on the Foliar Penetration of Acifluorfen in Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti): An Analysis Using the Fractional Factorial Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gary L. Willingham
Affiliation:
Agric. Formulations, Rohm and Haas, Springhouse, PA 19477
Linda L. Graham
Affiliation:
Agric. Formulations, Rohm and Haas, Springhouse, PA 19477

Abstract

Two-level fractional factorial design experiments were conducted in growth chambers to determine the influence of environmental factors and adjuvants on the foliar penetration of the sodium salt of acifluorfen in velvetleaf. Relative humidity (RH) was found to have the greatest effect on penetration. Temperature was the second most important factor. Although soil moisture significantly affected penetration, this effect was much less than that produced by RH and temperature. Diammonium phosphate (DAP) was the most effective adjuvant tested. The use of DAP at 1.12 kg/ha significantly increased penetration. The effect of DAP was less than either RH or temperature. Oxysorbic (5 POE) surfactant also significantly increased penetration. Glycerol and oxtoxynol (7 to 8 POE) surfactant had no effect on penetration. In separate experiments, acifluorfen penetration at low and high RH and with the addition of DAP was measured to verify these results. Acifluorfen penetration into velvetleaf increased approximately ninefold with changes in RH from low to high. Penetration increased sevenfold when DAP was added. DAP was by far the most effective adjuvant increasing acifluorfen penetration into velvetleaf under conditions of low RH. Oxysorbic (5 POE) surfactant slightly increased penetration under these conditions.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Babiker, A.G.T. and Duncan, H. J. 1975. Penetration of bracken fronds by amitrole as influenced by pre-spraying conditions, surfactants, and other additives. Weed Res. 15:123127.Google Scholar
2. Baker, E. A. 1980. Effects of cuticular components on foliar penetration. Pestic. Sci. 11:367370.Google Scholar
3. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. 1978. Pages 309313. Statistics for Experimenters:an Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Herbicide entry into plants. Pages 335364 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Ecology. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
5. Burr, R. J. and Warren, G. F. 1972. An oil carrier for increasing purple nutsedge control. Weed Sci. 20:324327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cook, G. T., Babiker, A.G.T., and Duncan, H. J. 1977. Penetration of bean leaves by aminotriazole as influenced by adjuvants and humidity. Pestic. Sci. 8:137146.Google Scholar
7. Daniel, C. 1959. Use of half-normal plots in interpreting factorial two-level experiments. Technometrics. 1: 311341.Google Scholar
8. Darnell, R. L. and Ferree, D. C. 1983. The influence of environment on apple malus-domestica tree growth leaf wax formation, and foliar absorption. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:506511.Google Scholar
9. Flore, J. A. and Bukovac, M. J. 1982. Factors influencing absorption of C-14 (2-chloroethyl) phosphonic acid by leaves of cherry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107:965968.Google Scholar
10. Hull, H. M., Morton, H. L., and Wharrie, J. R. 1975. Environmental influences on cuticular development and resultant foliar penetration. Bot. Rev. 41:421452.Google Scholar
11. Hunta, G. M. and Baker, E. A. 1983. Environmental factors affecting the retention and uptake of chlormequat into cereal leaves. Aspects of Applied Biology. 4:179185.Google Scholar
12. Mann, R. K. and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Effect of soil moisture on herbicidal action of foliar applied herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:316.Google Scholar
13. Meeusen, R. M., Lokey, S. M., and Yih, R. Y. 1983. Effects of environmental factors on the herbicidal activity of acifluorfen. Aspects of Applied Biology 4:253263.Google Scholar
14. Merrit, C. R. 1984. Influence of environmental factors on the activity of ioxynil salt and ester applied to Stellarvia media . Weed Res. 24:173182.Google Scholar
15. Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Neidermyer, R. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1969. A study of the selectivity of barban. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 24:81.Google Scholar
17. Norris, R. F. and Bukovac, M. J. 1972. Influence of cuticular waxes on penetration of pear leaf cuticle by 1-naphthaleneacetic acid. Pestic. Sci. 3:705708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Price, C. E. 1983. The effect of environment on foliage uptake and translocation of herbicides. Aspects Appl. Biol. 4:157169.Google Scholar
19. Richardson, R. G. 1977. A review of foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Weed Res. 17:259272.Google Scholar
20. Ritter, R. L. and Coble, H. D. 1981. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the activity of acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 29:480485.Google Scholar
21. Schmidt, D. K., Rathmann, D. P., and Kollman, G. E. 1984. Activators for enhanced control of velvetleaf with acifluorfensodium and bentazon combinations in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:24.Google Scholar
22. Smith, R. L. and Fontana, S. A. 1986. Comparison of 10-34-0 and 28-0-0 for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti medic.) control in acifluorfen and bentazon combinations in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:53.Google Scholar
23. Willingham, G. L. and Graham, L. L. 1986. Effect of adjuvants on the efficacy of acifluorfen sodium. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:95.Google Scholar
24. Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1981. Effect of environment on the translocation and toxicity of acifluorfen to showy crotolaria (Crotolaria spectabilis). Weed Sci. 29:397401.Google Scholar
25. Zahn, D. A. 1975. An empirical study of the half-normal plot. Technometrics. 2:201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar